Section of Hygiene - Institute of Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italia.
Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Roma, Italia.
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2020;16(1):81-85. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2019.1632684. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
Seasonal influenza vaccination (SIV) of health-care workers (HCWs) is recommended in most countries to protect them and their patients from infection. Although SIV can reduce the risk of influenza complications among vulnerable patients, vaccination uptake is generally unsatisfactory. The present study aimed to assess the impact of different programs in promoting SIV uptake among HCWs during the season 2017/2018 in four teaching hospitals in Rome. A multicentric cross-sectional study was carried out, in order to describe the four different campaigns and to assess their impact by identifying and developing a set of indicators that provide information about the vaccination services, the percentage of invited HCWs, the vaccinators' workforce and the vaccination coverage rates.The hospitals organized different strategies: Hospital 1, 3 and 4 organized educational courses for HCWs and actively invited every single HCW through e-mail. All the hospitals organized a dedicated unit for influenza vaccination, and Hospital 1 added on-site vaccination sessions that required a large number of staff. Hospital 1 and hospital 4 registered a comparable vaccination coverage rate, 12.97% and 12.76%, respectively, while it was 6.88% in Hospital 2 and 4.23% in Hospital 3. Our indicators demonstrated to be effective and useful for analyzing the different SIV campaigns. The results suggest that the best practice to promote SIV among HCWs should include multiple approaches. Among those, an easy access to the vaccination site seems to play a key role in determining a higher vaccination coverage.
季节性流感疫苗接种(SIV)已被推荐用于大多数国家的卫生保健工作者(HCWs),以保护他们和他们的患者免受感染。尽管 SIV 可以降低脆弱患者感染流感并发症的风险,但疫苗接种率通常不尽人意。本研究旨在评估在 2017/2018 年流感季节期间,在罗马的四家教学医院中,通过不同方案来提高 HCWs 接种 SIV 的效果。进行了一项多中心横断面研究,以描述这四个不同的方案,并通过确定和开发一系列提供有关疫苗接种服务、受邀 HCWs 百分比、疫苗接种人员劳动力和疫苗接种覆盖率的信息的指标,评估它们的影响。医院组织了不同的策略:医院 1、3 和 4 为 HCWs 组织了教育课程,并通过电子邮件积极邀请每一位 HCW。所有医院都为流感疫苗接种组织了专门的单位,医院 1 增加了现场疫苗接种,这需要大量的工作人员。医院 1 和医院 4 的疫苗接种覆盖率分别为 12.97%和 12.76%,而医院 2 和医院 3 的疫苗接种覆盖率分别为 6.88%和 4.23%。我们的指标被证明是分析不同 SIV 活动的有效和有用的方法。结果表明,促进 HCWs 接种 SIV 的最佳做法应该包括多种方法。其中,方便接种疫苗的途径似乎在决定更高的疫苗接种率方面起着关键作用。