Sullivan Nicole M, Blake Lindsay E, George Masil, Mears Simon C
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Academic Affairs Administration, College of Provost, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2019 May 30;10:2151459319849801. doi: 10.1177/2151459319849801. eCollection 2019.
Older patients with hip fracture have a 20% to 30% mortality rate in the year after surgery. Nonoperative care has higher 1-year mortality rates and is generally only pursued in those with an extraordinarily high surgical risk. As the population ages, more patients with hip fracture may fall into this category. The orthopedic surgeon is typically the main consultant responsible for deciding between surgery and conservative management, and the reasoning behind one decision over the other is often poorly understood. We undertook a review to determine decision-making tools for surgery in high-risk patients with hip fracture.
A review was conducted using PubMed to determine articles published using the terms palliative care, conservative care, nonoperative, hip fracture, orthopedic procedures, fracture fixation, and surgery. Our search resulted in 13 articles to review. These were further screened to determine tools for use in surgical decision-making.
Several potential decision-making tools were found in our search. The potential tools to identify patients who would benefit from nonoperative treatment included the Palliative Performance Scale for severe dementia, the Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living and Katz Activities of Daily Living scales for prefracture immobility, a combination of clinical signs and laboratory tests to determine risk of imminent death, and the Charlson Comorbidity Score for additional serious comorbidities. No tools have been prospectively tested in a clinical setting.
Evaluation of each patient using a variety of decision making tools should help the orthopedic surgeon determine which patients would be better suited to non-operative management. After determining the benefit of non-operative care, they must effectively allow the fracture to heal while ameliorating pain. Palliative care physicians can fulfill this role by providing support and symptom relief.
Surgical decision-making for hip fracture repair in the elderly patients is not straight forward. Several tools may be helpful to the surgeon in determining who may be better suited for nonoperative care or a palliative care referral. Prospective data do not exist in these decision-making tools.
老年髋部骨折患者术后一年的死亡率为20%至30%。非手术治疗的1年死亡率更高,一般仅适用于手术风险极高的患者。随着人口老龄化,更多髋部骨折患者可能属于这一类别。骨科医生通常是决定手术治疗还是保守治疗的主要顾问,但对于选择一种治疗方式而非另一种的理由,人们往往了解甚少。我们进行了一项综述,以确定高危髋部骨折患者手术治疗的决策工具。
使用PubMed进行综述,以确定使用姑息治疗、保守治疗、非手术、髋部骨折、骨科手术、骨折固定和手术等术语发表的文章。我们的检索结果为13篇待综述的文章。对这些文章进一步筛选,以确定用于手术决策的工具。
在检索中发现了几种潜在的决策工具。用于识别可能从非手术治疗中获益的患者的潜在工具包括用于严重痴呆的姑息治疗表现量表、用于骨折前活动不便的Lawton日常生活能力量表和Katz日常生活活动量表、用于确定即将死亡风险的临床体征和实验室检查组合,以及用于评估其他严重合并症的Charlson合并症评分。尚无工具在临床环境中进行前瞻性测试。
使用多种决策工具对每位患者进行评估,应有助于骨科医生确定哪些患者更适合非手术治疗。在确定非手术治疗的益处后,他们必须有效地使骨折愈合,同时减轻疼痛。姑息治疗医生可以通过提供支持和缓解症状来发挥这一作用。
老年患者髋部骨折修复的手术决策并非易事。几种工具可能有助于外科医生确定哪些患者更适合非手术治疗或转介至姑息治疗。这些决策工具尚无前瞻性数据。