• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2019 年是否会开启以患者为中心的护理新时代?

Will 2019 kick off a new era in person-centered care?

机构信息

Center for Consumer Engagement in Health Innovation, One Federal Street, 5th Floor, Boston, MA 02110. Email:

出版信息

Am J Manag Care. 2019 Jun 1;25(6):e165-e166.

PMID:31211547
Abstract

Medicare's star rating system for Medicare Advantage health plans is a powerful tool for driving plan behavior and, beginning in 2019, CMS is providing new weight to patient access and experience measures. As the shift begins, a recent analysis of person-centered care measures in the star rating system conducted by the Center for Consumer Engagement in Health Innovation found ample room for improving both plan performance and how the ratings measure patient-centeredness. Although from 2010 to 2017, plans performed better on person-centered measures compared with the other measures in the star rating set (3.4 vs 3.0), our analysis also shows that performance on patient-centered measures has not comparatively budged appreciably over time. This may indicate that improvement initiatives focused on non-person-centered star measures have not had a spillover effect on the person-centered measures, or that plans may feel that once a minimum threshold on person-centered measures is met, they need not focus attention on further improvements. At the same time, we need a more comprehensive assessment of person-centeredness. The CMS star measures classified as person-centered are limited in scope and do not constitute a comprehensive view of what it actually means to be person-centered. The new weighting of patient access and experience measures in the CMS star rating system will press plans to refocus their managerial attention, allocate internal assets, and improve their performance, but we also need new measures that are more closely aligned with the domains that describe person-centered care.

摘要

医疗保险优势健康计划的医疗保险星级评定系统是推动计划行为的有力工具,从 2019 年开始,CMS 为患者获得和体验措施提供了新的权重。随着这一转变的开始,消费者参与健康创新中心最近对星级评定系统中的以人为本的护理措施进行的分析发现,无论是提高计划绩效还是提高评分衡量以人为本的程度,都有很大的改进空间。尽管 2010 年至 2017 年,计划在以人为本的措施上的表现优于星级评定体系中的其他措施(3.4 对 3.0),但我们的分析也表明,随着时间的推移,以人为本的措施的绩效并没有明显提高。这可能表明,专注于非以人为本的星级措施的改进举措对以人为本的措施没有产生溢出效应,或者计划可能认为,一旦达到以人为本的措施的最低门槛,就无需再关注进一步的改进。同时,我们需要对以人为本进行更全面的评估。CMS 星级措施中被归类为以人为本的措施范围有限,不能全面反映以人为本的实际含义。CMS 星级评定系统中患者获得和体验措施的新权重将促使计划重新关注他们的管理注意力、分配内部资产并提高绩效,但我们还需要与描述以人为本的护理领域更紧密结合的新措施。

相似文献

1
Will 2019 kick off a new era in person-centered care?2019 年是否会开启以患者为中心的护理新时代?
Am J Manag Care. 2019 Jun 1;25(6):e165-e166.
2
A Pharmacist-Led, Patient-Centered Program Incorporating Motivational Interviewing for Behavior Change to Improve Adherence Rates and Star Ratings in a Medicare Plan.药剂师主导、以患者为中心的项目,结合动机访谈以改变行为,提高医疗保险计划中的服药依从率和星级评分。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Jan;26(1):35-41. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.1.35.
3
Relationships between Medicare Advantage contract characteristics and quality-of-care ratings: an observational analysis of Medicare Advantage star ratings.医疗保险优势计划合同特征与医疗质量评级之间的关系:对医疗保险优势星级评级的观测性分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Mar 3;162(5):353-8. doi: 10.7326/M14-0332.
4
Is there an association between the high-risk medication star ratings and member experience CMS star ratings measures?高风险药物星级评分与会员体验 CMS 星级评分措施之间是否存在关联?
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2014 Nov;20(11):1129-36. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2014.20.11.1129.
5
Medicare star ratings: stakeholder proceedings on community pharmacy and managed care partnerships in quality.医疗保险星级评定:关于社区药房与管理式医疗合作关系质量的利益相关方程序。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2014 May-Jun;54(3):228-40. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2014.13180.
6
Quality of Home Health Agencies Serving Traditional Medicare vs Medicare Advantage Beneficiaries.服务传统 Medicare 与 Medicare Advantage 受益人的家庭保健机构的质量。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Sep 4;2(9):e1910622. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.10622.
7
When the patient is the expert: measuring patient experience and satisfaction with care.当患者成为专家:测量患者对医疗护理的体验和满意度。
Bull World Health Organ. 2019 Aug 1;97(8):563-569. doi: 10.2471/BLT.18.225201. Epub 2019 May 28.
8
The Roles of Cost and Quality Information in Medicare Advantage Plan Enrollment Decisions: an Observational Study.成本和质量信息在医疗保险优势计划参保决策中的作用:一项观察性研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Feb;31(2):234-241. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3467-3. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
9
Quality of communication about medicines in United States hospitals: A national retrospective study.美国医院药品沟通质量:一项全国性回顾性研究。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2017 Jul-Aug;13(4):849-856. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2016.09.005. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
10
Adjusting Medicare Advantage star ratings for socioeconomic status and disability.调整医疗保险优势计划星级评定以反映社会经济地位和残疾状况。
Am J Manag Care. 2018 Sep 1;24(9):e285-e291.