Center for Consumer Engagement in Health Innovation, One Federal Street, 5th Floor, Boston, MA 02110. Email:
Am J Manag Care. 2019 Jun 1;25(6):e165-e166.
Medicare's star rating system for Medicare Advantage health plans is a powerful tool for driving plan behavior and, beginning in 2019, CMS is providing new weight to patient access and experience measures. As the shift begins, a recent analysis of person-centered care measures in the star rating system conducted by the Center for Consumer Engagement in Health Innovation found ample room for improving both plan performance and how the ratings measure patient-centeredness. Although from 2010 to 2017, plans performed better on person-centered measures compared with the other measures in the star rating set (3.4 vs 3.0), our analysis also shows that performance on patient-centered measures has not comparatively budged appreciably over time. This may indicate that improvement initiatives focused on non-person-centered star measures have not had a spillover effect on the person-centered measures, or that plans may feel that once a minimum threshold on person-centered measures is met, they need not focus attention on further improvements. At the same time, we need a more comprehensive assessment of person-centeredness. The CMS star measures classified as person-centered are limited in scope and do not constitute a comprehensive view of what it actually means to be person-centered. The new weighting of patient access and experience measures in the CMS star rating system will press plans to refocus their managerial attention, allocate internal assets, and improve their performance, but we also need new measures that are more closely aligned with the domains that describe person-centered care.
医疗保险优势健康计划的医疗保险星级评定系统是推动计划行为的有力工具,从 2019 年开始,CMS 为患者获得和体验措施提供了新的权重。随着这一转变的开始,消费者参与健康创新中心最近对星级评定系统中的以人为本的护理措施进行的分析发现,无论是提高计划绩效还是提高评分衡量以人为本的程度,都有很大的改进空间。尽管 2010 年至 2017 年,计划在以人为本的措施上的表现优于星级评定体系中的其他措施(3.4 对 3.0),但我们的分析也表明,随着时间的推移,以人为本的措施的绩效并没有明显提高。这可能表明,专注于非以人为本的星级措施的改进举措对以人为本的措施没有产生溢出效应,或者计划可能认为,一旦达到以人为本的措施的最低门槛,就无需再关注进一步的改进。同时,我们需要对以人为本进行更全面的评估。CMS 星级措施中被归类为以人为本的措施范围有限,不能全面反映以人为本的实际含义。CMS 星级评定系统中患者获得和体验措施的新权重将促使计划重新关注他们的管理注意力、分配内部资产并提高绩效,但我们还需要与描述以人为本的护理领域更紧密结合的新措施。