Salo Katharina I, Scharfen Jana, Wilden Isabelle D, Schubotz Ricarda I, Holling Heinz
Department of Psychology and Sports Sciences, Institute of Psychology, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität, Münster, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2019 May 31;10:1241. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01241. eCollection 2019.
The emphasizes the significance of vascular lesions in late-life depression. At present, no meta-analytic model has investigated whether a difference in hyperintensity burden compared to controls between late-life and late-onset depression is evident. By including a substantial number of studies, focusing on a meaningful outcome measure, and considering several moderating and control variables, the present meta-analysis investigates the severity of hyperintensity burden in major depressive disorder (MDD) and bipolar disorder (BD). A major focus of the present meta-analysis refers to the role of age at illness onset. It is analyzed whether late-onset rather than late-life depression characterizes vascular depression. In total, 68 studies were included in the meta-analysis and a multilevel random effects model was calculated using Hedges' as the effect size measure. The severity of hyperintensity burden was significantly greater in the patient group compared to the control group. This effect was evident regarding the whole patient group ( = 0.229) as well as both depression subgroups, with a significantly greater effect in BD ( = 0.374) compared to MDD ( = 0.189). Hyperintensity burden was more pronounced in late-onset depression than in early-onset depression or late-life depression. A considerable heterogeneity between the included studies was observed, which is reflected by the large variability in effects sizes. In conclusion, the present meta-analysis underscores the association of hyperintensities with MDD and BD. Especially late-onset depression is associated with an increased hyperintensity burden, which is in line with the . The results suggest that it might be more feasible to confine the concept of vascular depression specifically to late-onset depression as opposed to late-life depression. Further research is needed to understand the causal mechanisms that might underlie the relation between hyperintensity burden and depression.
这强调了血管病变在老年期抑郁症中的重要性。目前,尚无荟萃分析模型研究老年期抑郁症与晚发性抑郁症相比,与对照组相比高信号负荷是否存在差异。通过纳入大量研究、关注有意义的结局指标并考虑多个调节变量和控制变量,本荟萃分析研究了重度抑郁症(MDD)和双相情感障碍(BD)中高信号负荷的严重程度。本荟萃分析的一个主要重点是发病年龄的作用。分析晚发性抑郁症而非老年期抑郁症是否为血管性抑郁症的特征。荟萃分析总共纳入了68项研究,并使用Hedges' d作为效应量指标计算了多层次随机效应模型。与对照组相比,患者组高信号负荷的严重程度显著更高。在整个患者组(d = 0.229)以及两个抑郁症亚组中均观察到这种效应,与MDD(d = 0.189)相比,BD组的效应显著更大(d = 0.374)。晚发性抑郁症的高信号负荷比早发性抑郁症或老年期抑郁症更明显。纳入研究之间存在相当大的异质性,这反映在效应量的较大变异性上。总之,本荟萃分析强调了高信号与MDD和BD的关联。尤其是晚发性抑郁症与高信号负荷增加有关,这与[相关理论]一致。结果表明,将血管性抑郁症的概念专门限定于晚发性抑郁症而非老年期抑郁症可能更可行。需要进一步研究以了解高信号负荷与抑郁症之间关系背后可能的因果机制。