Imagami Toru, Takayama Satoru, Maeda Yohei, Hattori Taku, Matsui Ryohei, Sakamoto Masaki, Kani Hisanori
Department of Surgery, Nagoya Tokushukai General Hospital, 2-52 Kouzouji-cho kita, Kasugai-City, Aichi 487-0016, Japan.
Case Rep Surg. 2019 May 12;2019:2898691. doi: 10.1155/2019/2898691. eCollection 2019.
The double stapling technique has greatly facilitated intestinal reconstruction, particularly for anastomosis after anterior resection. However, anastomotic stenosis may occur, which sometimes requires surgical treatment. Redo surgery with reresection and reanastomosis presents a high risk of complications. Treatment methods need to be selected depending on the degree and location of stenosis. In an effort to propose a new resolution, reporting new cases and sharing valid experiences are necessary. An 82-year-old man diagnosed with rectal cancer had undergone laparoscopic anterior resection. Endoscopic balloon dilation performed for anastomotic stenosis had failed. Therefore, colostomy with double orifice was constructed on the oral side at 10 cm from the stenosis. Approaching from the anal and stoma side, the anastomotic stenosis was resected using a circular stapler. The colostomy was closed 1 month after surgery. Stenosis resection using a circular stapler requires the following steps: (1) passing the center shaft through the stenosis, (2) inserting the anvil head into the oral side of the stenosis, and (3) attaching the anvil head to the center shaft. This method can resect the stenosis using a circular stapler without being affected by postoperative adhesion in the pelvis. Compared to endoscopic balloon dilation, resection of the stricture by the circular stapler is thought to be reliable. This technique is particularly effective for localized stenosis, including anastomotic stenosis. It is considered that this method is minimally invasive and is low risk for complications. This method can contribute to the useful surgical option for refractory anastomotic stenosis after anterior resection.
双吻合器技术极大地促进了肠道重建,尤其是在前切除术后的吻合方面。然而,吻合口狭窄可能会发生,有时需要手术治疗。再次切除和重新吻合的再次手术并发症风险很高。治疗方法需要根据狭窄的程度和部位来选择。为了提出一种新的解决方案,报告新病例并分享有效经验是必要的。一名82岁被诊断为直肠癌的男性接受了腹腔镜前切除术。因吻合口狭窄进行的内镜球囊扩张失败。因此,在距狭窄处10 cm的口侧构建了双口结肠造口术。从肛门侧和造口侧进入,使用圆形吻合器切除吻合口狭窄。术后1个月关闭结肠造口。使用圆形吻合器切除狭窄需要以下步骤:(1)将中心轴穿过狭窄处,(2)将钉砧头插入狭窄处的口侧,(3)将钉砧头连接到中心轴上。这种方法可以使用圆形吻合器切除狭窄,而不受盆腔术后粘连的影响。与内镜球囊扩张相比,用圆形吻合器切除狭窄被认为更可靠。该技术对包括吻合口狭窄在内的局限性狭窄特别有效。认为这种方法微创且并发症风险低。这种方法可为前切除术后难治性吻合口狭窄提供有用的手术选择。