Suppr超能文献

重要抗生素类别相关感染风险:对 FDA 不良事件报告系统的分析。

Infection Risk with Important Antibiotic Classes: An Analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.

机构信息

Pharmacotherapy Division, College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, San Antonio, TX, USA.

Pharmacotherapy Education and Research Center, Long School of Medicine, University of Texas Health-San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.

出版信息

Int J Med Sci. 2019 May 7;16(5):630-635. doi: 10.7150/ijms.30739. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Antibiotic use is an important risk factor for infection (CDI). Prior meta-analyses have identified antibiotics and antibiotic classes that pose the greatest risk for CDI; however, CDI epidemiology is constantly changing and contemporary analyses are needed. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between CDI and important antibiotic classes in recent years using the FDA Adverse Event Report System (FAERS). FAERS reports from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2017 were analyzed. The Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) was used to identify CDI cases. We computed the Reporting Odds Ratios (RORs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) for the association between antibiotics and CDI. An association was considered statistically significant when the lower limit of the 95%CI was greater than 1. A total of 2,042,801 reports (including 5,187 CDI reports) were considered, after inclusion criteria were applied. Lincosamides (e.g., clindamycin) had the greatest proportion of CDI reports, representing 10.4% of all lincosamide reports. CDI RORs (95%CI) for the antibiotic classes were (in descending order): lincosamides 46.95 (39.49-55.82), monobactams 29.97 (14.60-61.54), penicillin combinations 20.05 (17.39-23.12), carbapenems 19.16 (15.52-23.67), cephalosporins/ monobactams/carbapenems 17.28 (14.95-19.97), cephalosporins 15.33 (12.60-18.65), tetracyclines 7.54 (5.42-10.50), macrolides 5.80 (4.48-7.51), fluoroquinolones 4.94 (4.20-5.81), and trimethoprim-sulfonamides 3.32 (2.03-5.43). All antibiotic classes included in the study were significantly associated with CDI. Lincosamides (e.g., clindamycin) had the highest CDI ROR among the antibiotics evaluated in this study.

摘要

抗生素的使用是感染(CDI)的一个重要危险因素。先前的荟萃分析已经确定了对 CDI 风险最大的抗生素和抗生素类别;然而,CDI 的流行病学不断变化,需要进行当代分析。本研究的目的是使用 FDA 不良事件报告系统(FAERS)评估近年来 CDI 与重要抗生素类别之间的关联。分析了 2015 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 12 月 31 日的 FAERS 报告。使用监管活动医学词典(MedDRA)来确定 CDI 病例。我们计算了抗生素与 CDI 之间关联的报告比值比(ROR)和相应的 95%置信区间(95%CI)。当 95%CI 的下限大于 1 时,认为关联具有统计学意义。在应用纳入标准后,共考虑了 2042801 份报告(包括 5187 份 CDI 报告)。林可酰胺类(如克林霉素)的 CDI 报告比例最大,占所有林可酰胺类报告的 10.4%。抗生素类别中的 CDI ROR(95%CI)为(降序排列):林可酰胺类 46.95(39.49-55.82),单环β-内酰胺类 29.97(14.60-61.54),青霉素类联合制剂 20.05(17.39-23.12),碳青霉烯类 19.16(15.52-23.67),头孢菌素/单环β-内酰胺类/碳青霉烯类 17.28(14.95-19.97),头孢菌素类 15.33(12.60-18.65),四环素类 7.54(5.42-10.50),大环内酯类 5.80(4.48-7.51),氟喹诺酮类 4.94(4.20-5.81),和磺胺甲噁唑/甲氧苄啶 3.32(2.03-5.43)。研究中包含的所有抗生素类别均与 CDI 显著相关。在本研究评估的抗生素中,林可酰胺类(如克林霉素)的 CDI ROR 最高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89c0/6566741/5194b5cbf8bc/ijmsv16p0630g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验