• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基层医疗中的患者体验:CG-CAHPS 调查的系统评价

Patient Experience in Primary Care: A Systematic Review of CG-CAHPS Surveys.

作者信息

Holt Jeana M

机构信息

University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee College of Nursing, Milwaukee, WI, USA.

Department of Family & Community Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.

出版信息

J Patient Exp. 2019 Jun;6(2):93-102. doi: 10.1177/2374373518793143. Epub 2018 Aug 12.

DOI:10.1177/2374373518793143
PMID:31218253
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6558944/
Abstract

The National Academy of Medicine's (NAM) vision for 21st-century health care underscored the need for increased patient engagement and charged health-care researchers to develop tools to evaluate patient experience. The most widely studied patient experience tools are the Consumer Assessments of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) surveys. The Clinician and Group (CG)-CAHPS survey is the preferred patient experience survey for primary care, and thus a systematic review of patient reports from the CG-CAHPS empirical literature is ideal to appreciate the voice of health-care consumers. This systematic review revealed patient subjective reports regarding the acceptability of health-care delivery models, the effectiveness of interventions, the timeliness of care in different practice climates, and their responses to quality improvement initiatives. The synthesized results inform clinicians, organizations, and the health-care system where to prioritize and how to adapt services to efficiently provide equitable care, achieving the NAM's vision for a patient-centered US health-care system.

摘要

美国国家医学院(NAM)对21世纪医疗保健的愿景强调了提高患者参与度的必要性,并责成医疗保健研究人员开发评估患者体验的工具。研究最为广泛的患者体验工具是医疗服务提供者与系统消费者评估(CAHPS)调查。临床医生与团体(CG)-CAHPS调查是初级保健中首选的患者体验调查,因此,对CG-CAHPS实证文献中的患者报告进行系统综述,有助于了解医疗保健消费者的心声。该系统综述揭示了患者关于医疗服务提供模式的可接受性、干预措施的有效性、不同执业环境下护理的及时性以及他们对质量改进举措的反应的主观报告。综合结果为临床医生、机构和医疗保健系统提供了信息,以确定优先事项以及如何调整服务,从而高效地提供公平的护理,实现NAM对以患者为中心的美国医疗保健系统的愿景。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3a6/6558944/386d863eb4a3/10.1177_2374373518793143-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3a6/6558944/386d863eb4a3/10.1177_2374373518793143-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3a6/6558944/386d863eb4a3/10.1177_2374373518793143-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Patient Experience in Primary Care: A Systematic Review of CG-CAHPS Surveys.基层医疗中的患者体验:CG-CAHPS 调查的系统评价
J Patient Exp. 2019 Jun;6(2):93-102. doi: 10.1177/2374373518793143. Epub 2018 Aug 12.
2
How the CAHPS Clinician and Group Patient Experience Survey Data Have Been Used in Research: A Systematic Review.CAHPS临床医生与团体患者体验调查数据在研究中的应用方式:一项系统综述
J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2024 Jul 16;11(2):88-96. doi: 10.17294/2330-0698.2056. eCollection 2024 Summer.
3
Some Aspects of Patient Experience Assessed by Practices Undergoing Patient-Centered Medical Home Transformation Are Measured by CAHPS, Others Are Not.通过 CAHPS 衡量正在进行以患者为中心的医疗之家转型的实践所评估的患者体验的某些方面,其他方面则没有。
Qual Manag Health Care. 2020 Oct/Dec;29(4):179-187. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000263.
4
Patient Comments on the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Clinician and Group (CG-CAHPS) Survey Reflect Improvements in Provider Behaviors From Coaching.患者对医疗保健提供者和系统临床医生及团队(CG-CAHPS)调查的评价反映了从辅导中改善了提供者的行为。
J Healthc Manag. 2023;68(4):251-267. doi: 10.1097/JHM-D-22-00140. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
5
Do 360-degree feedback survey results relate to patient satisfaction measures?360度反馈调查结果与患者满意度指标有关吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 May;473(5):1590-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3981-3.
6
Development and psychometric properties of the Japanese Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Clinician & Group Survey (CG-CAHPS).日本医疗保健提供者和系统消费者评估临床医生和小组调查(CG-CAHPS)的开发和心理测量特性。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 28;16(4):e0250843. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250843. eCollection 2021.
7
Associations of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) Clinician and Group Survey Scores with Interventions and Site, Provider, and Patient Factors: A Systematic Review of the Evidence.医疗服务提供者与系统消费者评估(CAHPS)临床医生及团体调查分数与干预措施、场所、提供者和患者因素的关联:证据的系统评价
J Patient Exp. 2024 Oct 13;11:23743735241283204. doi: 10.1177/23743735241283204. eCollection 2024.
8
Use of CAHPS patient experience survey data as part of a patient-centered medical home quality improvement initiative.将CAHPS患者体验调查数据用作以患者为中心的医疗之家质量改进计划的一部分。
J Healthc Leadersh. 2015 Jul 7;7:41-54. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S69963. eCollection 2015.
9
Psychometric properties of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) Clinician and Group Adult Visit Survey.消费者评估医疗保健提供者和系统(CAHPS®)临床医生和成人团体就诊调查的心理测量特性。
Med Care. 2012 Nov;50 Suppl(Suppl):S28-34. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31826cbc0d.
10
Possibilities for Shortening the CAHPS Clinician and Group Survey.缩短医疗服务消费者评估与医疗服务提供者及系统调查(CAHPS)的可能性。
Med Care. 2016 Jan;54(1):32-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000452.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the Future of Mental Health: Telepsychiatry Video Consultations on Mobile Phones Versus Laptops: Findings from a Tertiary Care Center.探索心理健康的未来:手机与笔记本电脑上的远程精神病学视频会诊——来自一家三级护理中心的研究结果
Indian J Psychol Med. 2025 Jul 30:02537176251352038. doi: 10.1177/02537176251352038.
2
Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Psychometric Properties of the Arabic Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems-Clinician and Group Survey (CG-CAHPS): A Cross-Sectional Study.阿拉伯语版医疗服务提供者与系统消费者评估-临床医生及团体调查(CG-CAHPS)的翻译、跨文化调适及心理测量学特性:一项横断面研究
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025 Apr 8;19:955-962. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S508958. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The effect of implementing a care coordination program on team dynamics and the patient experience.实施护理协调计划对团队动态和患者体验的影响。
Am J Manag Care. 2017 Aug;23(8):494-500.
2
A network perspective on patient experiences and health status: the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey 2004 to 2011.从网络视角看患者体验与健康状况:2004年至2011年医疗支出小组调查
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Aug 22;17(1):579. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2496-5.
3
Comparison of Patient Experience between a Practice for Homeless Patients and Other Practices Engaged in a Patient-Centered Medical Home Initiative.
Patient experience and primary care teams: a cross-sectional survey of French elderly patients.
患者体验与基层医疗团队:对法国老年患者的横断面调查
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 12;15(3):e085626. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085626.
4
Patient-reported experience measures for people living with dementia: A scoping review.痴呆症患者报告的体验测量:范围综述。
Dementia (London). 2024 Nov;23(8):1354-1381. doi: 10.1177/14713012241272823. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
5
How the CAHPS Clinician and Group Patient Experience Survey Data Have Been Used in Research: A Systematic Review.CAHPS临床医生与团体患者体验调查数据在研究中的应用方式:一项系统综述
J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2024 Jul 16;11(2):88-96. doi: 10.17294/2330-0698.2056. eCollection 2024 Summer.
6
Differential Effect of Patient- and Provider-Level Factors on Patient Satisfaction Scores in Academic General Internal Medicine Clinics.患者和提供者层面的因素对学术综合内科诊所患者满意度评分的差异影响。
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Sep;39(12):2261-2267. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08648-3. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
7
Patient Reported Indicator Surveys (Paris): Methodological Considerations of a Field Trial in Slovenia.患者报告指标调查(巴黎):斯洛文尼亚一项现场试验的方法学考量
Zdr Varst. 2024 Mar 1;63(1):30-37. doi: 10.2478/sjph-2024-0005. eCollection 2024 Mar.
8
Healthcare Service Quality Evaluated Using the Degree of Satisfaction of Patients in Romanian Community Pharmacies.使用罗马尼亚社区药房患者满意度评估医疗服务质量
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Nov 25;11(23):3038. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11233038.
9
Beyond satisfaction in person-centered pharmacy services.超越以患者为中心的药学服务中的满意度。
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2023 Oct 30;12:100355. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2023.100355. eCollection 2023 Dec.
10
Quality of Medication Cost Conversations and Interest in Future Cost Conversations Among Older Adults.老年人的药物费用沟通质量和对未来费用沟通的兴趣。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Dec;38(16):3482-3489. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08388-w. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
无家可归患者诊所与参与以患者为中心的医疗之家倡议的其他诊所之间的患者体验比较。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2017;28(3):1151-1164. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2017.0103.
4
CAHPS and Comments: How Closed-Ended Survey Questions and Narrative Accounts Interact in the Assessment of Patient Experience.CAHPS与评论:封闭式调查问题与叙述性记录在患者体验评估中的相互作用
J Patient Exp. 2017 Mar;4(1):37-45. doi: 10.1177/2374373516685940. Epub 2017 Jan 1.
5
Patient experience midway through a large primary care practice transformation initiative.大型基层医疗实践转型计划进行到一半时的患者体验。
Am J Manag Care. 2017 Mar;23(3):178-184.
6
Evolving Concepts of Patient-Centered Care and the Assessment of Patient Care Experiences: Optimism and Opposition.以患者为中心的护理理念的演变与患者护理体验评估:乐观与反对
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2016 Aug;41(4):675-96. doi: 10.1215/03616878-3620881. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
7
Breaking Narrative Ground: Innovative Methods for Rigorously Eliciting and Assessing Patient Narratives.突破叙事领域:严格引出和评估患者叙事的创新方法。
Health Serv Res. 2016 Jun;51 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):1248-72. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12503. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
8
Communication Barriers and the Clinical Recognition of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in a Diverse Cohort of Adults: The DISTANCE Study.沟通障碍与不同成年人群体中糖尿病周围神经病变的临床识别:DISTANCE研究
J Health Commun. 2016 May;21(5):544-53. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2015.1103335. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
9
Effect of a Pragmatic, Cluster-randomized Controlled Trial on Patient Experience With Care: The Transforming Outcomes for Patients Through Medical Home Evaluation and reDesign (TOPMED) Study.一项实用的整群随机对照试验对患者就医体验的影响:通过医疗之家评估与重新设计改善患者结局(TOPMED)研究
Med Care. 2016 Aug;54(8):745-51. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000552.
10
Two-Year Costs and Quality in the Comprehensive Primary Care Initiative.综合初级保健倡议的两年成本和质量。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jun 16;374(24):2345-56. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1414953. Epub 2016 Apr 13.