1500 San Remo Ave, Ste 360, Coral Gables, FL 33143. E-mail:
Am J Manag Care. 2017 Aug;23(8):494-500.
Care coordination programs are frequently implemented in the redesign of primary care systems, focused on improving patient outcomes and reducing utilization. However, redesign can be disruptive, affect patient experiences, and undermine elements in the patient-centered medical home, such as team-based care.
Case-controlled study with difference-in-differences (DID) and cross-sectional analyses.
The phased implementation of a care coordination program permitted evaluation of a natural experiment to compare measures of patient experience and teamwork in practices with and without care coordinators. Patient experience scores were compared before and after the introduction of care coordinators, using DID analyses. Cross-sectional data were used to compare teamwork, based on the relational coordination survey, and physician-perceived barriers to coordinated care between clinics with and without care coordinators.
We evaluated survey responses from 459 staff and physicians and 13,441 patients in 26 primary care practices. Practices with care coordinators did not have significantly different relational coordination scores compared with practices without care coordinators, and physicians in these practices did not report reduced barriers to coordinated care. After implementation of the program, patients in practices with care coordinators reported a more positive experience with staff over time (DID, 2.6 percentage points; P = .0009).
A flexible program that incorporates care coordinators into the existing care team was minimally disruptive to existing team dynamics, and the embedded care coordinators were associated with a small increase in patient ratings that reflected a more positive experience with staff.
协调护理计划通常在重新设计初级保健系统时实施,重点是改善患者的预后并减少利用。然而,重新设计可能会造成干扰,影响患者的体验,并破坏以患者为中心的医疗之家的要素,如团队为基础的护理。
病例对照研究,采用差异(DID)和横截面分析。
协调护理计划的分阶段实施允许评估自然实验,以比较有和没有协调员的实践中患者体验和团队合作的措施。使用 DID 分析比较协调员引入前后的患者体验得分。使用横截面数据比较团队合作,基于关系协调调查,以及有和没有协调员的诊所之间医生感知的协调护理障碍。
我们评估了 26 个初级保健实践中 459 名员工和医生以及 13441 名患者的调查答复。与没有协调员的实践相比,有协调员的实践的关系协调评分没有显著差异,并且这些实践中的医生没有报告协调护理障碍减少。在计划实施后,有协调员的实践中的患者随着时间的推移报告了对员工的更积极体验(DID,2.6 个百分点;P =.0009)。
一项灵活的计划,将协调员纳入现有的护理团队,对现有团队动态的干扰最小,并且嵌入式协调员与患者评分的微小增加相关,这反映了对员工更积极的体验。