Ogink Paula Am, de Jong Jelske M, Koeneman Mats, Weenk Mariska, Engelen Lucien Jlpg, van Goor Harry, van de Belt Tom H, Bredie Sebastian Jh
Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
REshape Innovation Center, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jun 19;21(6):e11164. doi: 10.2196/11164.
Frequent home blood pressure (BP) measurements result in a better estimation of the true BP. However, traditional cuff-based BP measurements are troublesome for patients.
This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a cuffless device for ambulatory systolic blood pressure (SBP) measurement.
This was a mixed method feasibility study in patients with hypertension. Performance of ambulatory SBPs with the device was analyzed quantitatively by intrauser reproducibility and comparability to a classic home BP monitor. Correct use by the patients was checked with video, and user-friendliness was assessed using a validated questionnaire, the System Usability Scale (SUS). Patient experiences were assessed using qualitative interviews.
A total of 1020 SBP measurements were performed using the Checkme monitor in 11 patients with hypertension. Duplicate SBPs showed a high intrauser correlation (R=0.86, P<.001). SBPs measured by the Checkme monitor did not correlate well with those of the different home monitors (R=0.47, P=.007). However, the mean SBPs measured by the Checkme and home monitors over the 3-week follow-up were strongly correlated (R=0.75, P=.008). In addition, 36.4% (n=4) of the participants performed the Checkme measurements without any mistakes. The mean SUS score was 86.4 (SD 8.3). The most important facilitator was the ease of using the Checkme monitor. Most important barriers included the absence of diastolic BP and the incidental difficulties in obtaining an SBP result.
Given the good intrauser reproducibility, user-friendliness, and patient experience, all of which facilitate patients to perform frequent measurements, cuffless BP monitoring may change the way patients measure their BP at home in the context of ambulant hypertension management.
频繁进行家庭血压测量有助于更准确地估计真实血压。然而,传统的袖带式血压测量对患者来说很麻烦。
本研究旨在评估一种无袖带设备用于动态收缩压测量的可行性。
这是一项针对高血压患者的混合方法可行性研究。通过使用者内部的可重复性以及与经典家庭血压监测仪的可比性,对该设备测量动态收缩压的性能进行了定量分析。通过视频检查患者的正确使用情况,并使用经过验证的问卷——系统可用性量表(SUS)评估用户友好性。通过定性访谈评估患者的体验。
11名高血压患者使用Checkme监测仪共进行了1020次收缩压测量。重复测量的收缩压显示出较高的使用者内部相关性(R = 0.86,P <.001)。Checkme监测仪测量的收缩压与不同家庭监测仪测量的收缩压相关性不佳(R = 0.47,P =.007)。然而,在3周的随访期间,Checkme监测仪和家庭监测仪测量的平均收缩压高度相关(R = 0.75,P =.008)。此外,36.4%(n = 4)的参与者在进行Checkme测量时没有任何错误。SUS的平均得分为86.4(标准差8.3)。最重要的促进因素是Checkme监测仪使用方便。最重要的障碍包括无法测量舒张压以及偶尔难以获得收缩压结果。
鉴于其良好的使用者内部可重复性、用户友好性和患者体验,所有这些都有助于患者频繁进行测量,无袖带血压监测可能会改变患者在动态高血压管理背景下在家中测量血压的方式。