Cooper I S, Upton A R
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl. 1978(34):349-54.
Eighteen of the first 29 patients with intractable epilepsy treated by chronic cerebellar stimulation (CCS) demonstrated a marked suppression of seizures. Sixty-eight of 100 patients with cerebral palsy showed clinical improvement after CCS. Electroencephalographic studies in three epileptic patients revealed a significant (P less than 0.001) reduction in number and duration of paroxysmal EEG discharges during epochs when the stimulator was on; prolonged effects were seen at stimulation rates of 200 c/sec and 10 c/sec (monophasic capacitively coupled stimuli). "Rebound" increases in numbers and durations of paroxysmal discharges occurred after cessation of CCS: immediate "rebounds" occurred within the next 5 min; such rebound effects were also seen in the frequency of clinical seizures. CCS at voltages well above threshold for the production of changes in H reflexes, late motor responses (V1 and V2), and evoked potentials resulted in increased "rebound" effects after cessation of stimulation and such effects were seen clinically and neurophysiologically in epileptic and cerebral palsy patients. Variability in the effects of CCS on seizures and the EEG may have been due to technical factors such as positions and impedances of electrodes, output of the stimulator, effects of anticonvulsant medication and patient differences; there was no clinical or physiological evidence of any undesirable neurological effect of CCS. In one patient, onset of CCS was frequently associated with cessation of polyspike and wave discharges; such results raise the possibility of triggering CCS from paroxysmal discharges in the EEG (contingency feedback) but rebound effects may complicate such therapy.
在首批接受慢性小脑刺激(CCS)治疗的29例顽固性癫痫患者中,有18例癫痫发作得到显著抑制。100例脑瘫患者中有68例在接受CCS治疗后临床症状有所改善。对3例癫痫患者进行的脑电图研究显示,在刺激器开启期间,阵发性脑电图放电的数量和持续时间显著减少(P<0.001);在200次/秒和10次/秒的刺激频率下(单相电容耦合刺激)观察到了延长效应。停止CCS后,阵发性放电的数量和持续时间出现“反弹”增加:在接下来的5分钟内立即出现“反弹”;临床癫痫发作频率也出现了这种反弹效应。在远高于产生H反射、晚期运动反应(V1和V2)及诱发电位变化阈值的电压下进行CCS,会导致刺激停止后“反弹”效应增强,这种效应在癫痫和脑瘫患者的临床和神经生理学表现中均有体现。CCS对癫痫发作和脑电图的影响存在差异,可能是由于电极位置和阻抗、刺激器输出、抗惊厥药物的作用以及患者个体差异等技术因素所致;没有临床或生理学证据表明CCS会产生任何不良神经效应。在1例患者中,CCS的开启常与多棘波和尖波放电的停止相关;这些结果增加了通过脑电图中的阵发性放电触发CCS(意外反馈)的可能性,但反弹效应可能会使这种治疗复杂化。