• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Early discharge criteria in patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections in a large tertiary-care teaching hospital in Florence, Italy.意大利佛罗伦萨一家大型三级教学医院中急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染患者的早期出院标准。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019 Sep;38(9):1781-1785. doi: 10.1007/s10096-019-03609-9. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
2
Antibiotic treatment patterns across Europe in patients with complicated skin and soft-tissue infections due to meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a plea for implementation of early switch and early discharge criteria.欧洲耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌所致复杂性皮肤软组织感染患者的抗生素治疗模式:呼吁实施早期转换和早期出院标准。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2014 Jul;44(1):56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2014.04.007. Epub 2014 May 16.
3
Assessing the economic value of avoiding hospital admissions by shifting the management of gram+ acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections to an outpatient care setting.通过将革兰氏阳性菌急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染的管理转移到门诊护理环境中来评估避免住院的经济价值。
J Med Econ. 2015;18(12):1092-101. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2015.1078339. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
4
Current and future trends in antibiotic therapy of acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections.急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染的抗生素治疗现状和未来趋势。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016 Apr;22 Suppl 2:S27-36. doi: 10.1016/S1198-743X(16)30095-7.
5
Pan-European early switch/early discharge opportunities exist for hospitalized patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus complicated skin and soft tissue infections.欧洲各地为患有耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌复杂性皮肤和软组织感染的住院患者提供了早期转换/早期出院的机会。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014 Oct;20(10):993-1000. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12632. Epub 2014 May 15.
6
Economic burden of hospital admissions for patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections in the United States.美国急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染患者住院治疗的经济负担。
Hosp Pract (1995). 2018 Dec;46(5):278-286. doi: 10.1080/21548331.2018.1506673. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
7
A comparison of costs and hospital length of stay associated with intravenous/oral linezolid or intravenous vancomycin treatment of complicated skin and soft-tissue infections caused by suspected or confirmed methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in elderly US patients.美国老年患者中,静脉注射/口服利奈唑胺或静脉注射万古霉素治疗疑似或确诊耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌引起的复杂皮肤和软组织感染的成本及住院时间比较。
Clin Ther. 2007 Mar;29(3):469-77. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(07)80085-3.
8
Cost-effectiveness of telavancin versus vancomycin for treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections.替考拉宁与万古霉素治疗复杂性皮肤及皮肤结构感染的成本效益分析
Pharmacotherapy. 2008 Dec;28(12):1471-82. doi: 10.1592/phco.28.12.1471.
9
Budget Impact Analysis of Dalbavancin in the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections in Three European Countries.在三个欧洲国家治疗急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染的达巴万星预算影响分析。
Clin Drug Investig. 2020 Apr;40(4):305-318. doi: 10.1007/s40261-020-00891-w.
10
Characteristics of ED crowding in the Lazio Region (Italy) and short-term health outcomes.拉齐奥地区(意大利)ED 人群特征与短期健康结局。
Intern Emerg Med. 2019 Jan;14(1):109-117. doi: 10.1007/s11739-018-1881-3. Epub 2018 May 25.

本文引用的文献

1
When to switch to an oral treatment and/or to discharge a patient with skin and soft tissue infections.何时转为口服治疗和/或何时可以让患有皮肤及软组织感染的患者出院。
Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2018 Apr;31(2):163-169. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000434.
2
Management of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections with a focus on patients at high risk of treatment failure.以治疗失败高风险患者为重点的急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染的管理。
Ther Adv Infect Dis. 2017 Sep;4(5):143-161. doi: 10.1177/2049936117723228. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
3
Newer glycopeptide antibiotics for treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections: systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost analysis.新型糖肽类抗生素治疗复杂性皮肤软组织感染的系统评价、网络荟萃分析及成本分析。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 Apr;24(4):361-368. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.08.028. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
4
Dalbavancin as a cost effective antibiotic.达巴万星作为一种具有成本效益的抗生素。
Infect Dis (Lond). 2018 Jan;50(1):75-76. doi: 10.1080/23744235.2017.1365169. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
5
Diagnosis and management of skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTI). A literature review and consensus statement: an update.皮肤和软组织感染(SSTI)的诊断与管理:文献综述与共识声明(更新版)
J Chemother. 2017 Aug;29(4):197-214. doi: 10.1080/1120009X.2017.1311398. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
6
Early clinical assessment of response to treatment of skin and soft-tissue infections: how can it help clinicians? Perspectives from Europe.早期临床评估皮肤和软组织感染治疗反应:它如何帮助临床医生?来自欧洲的观点。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2016 Aug;48(2):127-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.04.023. Epub 2016 May 25.
7
Current and future trends in antibiotic therapy of acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections.急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染的抗生素治疗现状和未来趋势。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016 Apr;22 Suppl 2:S27-36. doi: 10.1016/S1198-743X(16)30095-7.
8
Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections in internal medicine wards: old and new drugs.内科病房中的急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染:新旧药物
Intern Emerg Med. 2016 Aug;11(5):637-48. doi: 10.1007/s11739-016-1450-6. Epub 2016 Apr 15.
9
Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI): practice guidelines for management and care transitions in the emergency department and hospital.急性细菌性皮肤及皮肤结构感染(ABSSSI):急诊科和医院管理及护理转接的实践指南
J Emerg Med. 2015 Apr;48(4):508-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.12.001. Epub 2015 Jan 17.
10
A comparative analysis of the patient characteristics and cost of managing intravenous drug users (IVDU) with soft tissue abscesses with non-IVDU.对患有软组织脓肿的静脉注射吸毒者(IVDU)与非静脉注射吸毒者的患者特征及管理成本进行比较分析。
Surgeon. 2016 Feb;14(1):13-7. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2014.08.003. Epub 2014 Sep 5.

意大利佛罗伦萨一家大型三级教学医院中急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染患者的早期出院标准。

Early discharge criteria in patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections in a large tertiary-care teaching hospital in Florence, Italy.

机构信息

Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Infectious and Tropical Diseases Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019 Sep;38(9):1781-1785. doi: 10.1007/s10096-019-03609-9. Epub 2019 Jun 20.

DOI:10.1007/s10096-019-03609-9
PMID:31222396
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6695376/
Abstract

The study is aimed at retrospectively estimating the percentage of inpatients with severe acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) who met the early discharged (ED) criteria adapted from Nathwani et al. (Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2016 Aug;48(2):127-36) and to calculate the number of hospitalization days that could be potentially saved. A retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital in Florence, Italy. We included all patients admitted for cellulitis and post-surgical infections from 2014 to 2017. Demographic and clinical data were obtained from electronic medical records. We a priori defined the following as a risk factor for non-adherence (RFNA): active or on methadone intravenous drug users, homeless, migrants without health care assistance, and patients who need a caregiver to take prescribed medications. One hundred sixty-two subjects were enrolled. Of them, 94 (58.0%) were male, and 113 (69.7%) had cellulitis/erysipelas. A microbiological isolate was obtained in 51 patients (31.4%); Staphylococcus aureus was the most frequent (47%). Eighty-four (51.8%) were ED suitable, with 258 (49.0%) patient days potentially saved. Among the 78 not ED suitable patients, the most common reason for prolonged length of stay (LOS) was having at least one RFNA (34.6%). Fourteen (18.0%) had one RFNA. Half of the patients admitted in our hospital met the ED criteria with a sparing close to 50% in terms of hospitalization days. Unstable social and personal factors were the most frequent causes for prolonged LOS. In this selected subset of patients, more recent and easier to administer treatments, including long-acting agents, could be proposed.

摘要

本研究旨在回顾性估计符合 Nathwani 等人(Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2016 Aug;48(2):127-36)制定的早期出院(ED)标准的严重急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染(ABSSSI)住院患者的比例,并计算潜在可节省的住院天数。这项回顾性研究在意大利佛罗伦萨的一家三级保健医院进行。我们纳入了 2014 年至 2017 年因蜂窝织炎和手术后感染而入院的所有患者。从电子病历中获取人口统计学和临床数据。我们预先将以下因素定义为不遵守(RFNA)的风险因素:正在使用或使用美沙酮静脉药物的人、无家可归者、没有医疗保健援助的移民,以及需要照顾者来服用规定药物的患者。共纳入 162 名受试者。其中,94 名(58.0%)为男性,113 名(69.7%)患有蜂窝织炎/丹毒。51 名患者(31.4%)获得了微生物分离物;最常见的是金黄色葡萄球菌(47%)。84 名(51.8%)适合 ED,潜在节省 258 名(49.0%)患者的住院天数。在 78 名不适合 ED 的患者中,延长住院时间(LOS)最常见的原因是至少有一个 RFNA(34.6%)。14 名(18.0%)有一个 RFNA。我们医院收治的近一半患者符合 ED 标准,在住院天数方面节省了近 50%。不稳定的社会和个人因素是 LOS 延长最常见的原因。在这个选定的患者亚组中,可以提出更近期和更易于管理的治疗方法,包括长效制剂。