• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用马赫-曾德尔干涉仪进行光声组织分化。

Optoacoustic Tissue Differentiation Using a Mach-Zehnder Interferometer.

出版信息

IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2019 Sep;66(9):1435-1443. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2019.2923696. Epub 2019 Jun 19.

DOI:10.1109/TUFFC.2019.2923696
PMID:31226071
Abstract

Laser osteotomy offers a way to make precise and less traumatic cuts smaller than conventional mechanical bone surgery tools. To fully exploit the advantages of laser osteotomy over conventional osteotomy, real-time feedback to differentiate the hard bone from the surrounding soft tissues is desired. In this study, we differentiated various tissue types-hard and soft bone, fat, muscle, and skin tissues from five proximal and distal fresh porcine femurs-based on cutting sounds. For laser ablation, an Nd:YAG laser was used to create ten craters on the surface of each proximal and distal femurs. For sound recording, the probing beam of a Mach-Zehnder interferometer was placed 5 cm away from each ablation site. For offline tissue differentiation, we investigated the measurements by looking at the amplitude frequency band between 0.83 and 1.25 MHz, which provides the least average classification error. Then, we used principal component analysis to reduce the dimensionality and the 95% confidence ellipsoid (Mahalanobis distance) method to differentiate between tissues based on the acoustic shock wave. A set of 14 400 data points, measured from ten craters in four proximal and distal femurs, was used as "training data," while a set of 3600 data points from ten craters in the remaining proximal and distal femurs was considered as "testing data." As is seen in the confusion matrix, the experimental-based scores of hard and soft bones, fat, muscles, and skin yielded average classification errors (with leave-one-out cross validation) of 0.11%, 57.69%, 0.06%, 0.14%, and 2.92%, respectively. The results of this study demonstrate a promising technique for differentiating tissues during laser osteotomy.

摘要

激光截骨术提供了一种方法,可以比传统的机械骨手术工具更精确、创伤更小地进行切割。为了充分利用激光截骨术相对于传统截骨术的优势,需要实时反馈来区分硬骨和周围软组织。在这项研究中,我们基于切割声音从五个近端和远端新鲜猪股骨中区分了各种组织类型——硬骨和软组织、脂肪、肌肉和皮肤组织。对于激光烧蚀,使用 Nd:YAG 激光在每个近端和远端股骨的表面上创建十个凹坑。对于声音记录,马赫-曾德尔干涉仪的探测光束放置在每个烧蚀点 5 厘米处。对于离线组织分化,我们研究了通过观察 0.83 到 1.25MHz 之间的振幅频带的测量结果,该频带提供了最小的平均分类错误。然后,我们使用主成分分析来降低维度,使用 95%置信椭圆体(马氏距离)方法根据声冲击波来区分组织。从四个近端和远端股骨中的十个凹坑测量的一组 14400 个数据点被用作“训练数据”,而剩余近端和远端股骨中的十个凹坑的一组 3600 个数据点被视为“测试数据”。如混淆矩阵所示,硬骨和软组织、脂肪、肌肉和皮肤的实验得分的平均分类错误(采用留一法交叉验证)分别为 0.11%、57.69%、0.06%、0.14%和 2.92%。这项研究的结果表明,这是一种在激光截骨术中区分组织的有前途的技术。

相似文献

1
Optoacoustic Tissue Differentiation Using a Mach-Zehnder Interferometer.利用马赫-曾德尔干涉仪进行光声组织分化。
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2019 Sep;66(9):1435-1443. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2019.2923696. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
2
Machine Learning-Based Optoacoustic Tissue Classification Method for Laser Osteotomes Using an Air-Coupled Transducer.基于机器学习的空气耦合换能器激光骨刀组织分类方法。
Lasers Surg Med. 2021 Mar;53(3):377-389. doi: 10.1002/lsm.23290. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
3
Toward optoacoustic sciatic nerve detection using an all-fiber interferometric-based sensor for endoscopic smart laser surgery.采用基于全光纤干涉的传感器进行内窥智能激光手术中的光电声学坐骨神经检测。
Lasers Surg Med. 2022 Feb;54(2):289-304. doi: 10.1002/lsm.23473. Epub 2021 Sep 4.
4
Characterisation of debris from laser and mechanical cutting of bone.
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2014 Jul;228(7):735-9. doi: 10.1177/0954411914541089. Epub 2014 Jun 20.
5
Multimodal feedback systems for smart laser osteotomy: Depth control and tissue differentiation.用于智能激光截骨术的多模态反馈系统:深度控制与组织区分
Lasers Surg Med. 2023 Dec;55(10):900-911. doi: 10.1002/lsm.23732. Epub 2023 Oct 23.
6
Er:YAG laser osteotomy for removal of impacted teeth: clinical comparison of two techniques.铒激光截骨术拔除阻生牙:两种技术的临床比较
Lasers Surg Med. 2007 Aug;39(7):583-8. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20528.
7
Femtosecond laser ablation of the stapes.镫骨的飞秒激光消融术
J Biomed Opt. 2009 Mar-Apr;14(2):024040. doi: 10.1117/1.3120490.
8
Does Laser Surgery Interfere with Optical Nerve Identification in Maxillofacial Hard and Soft Tissue?--An Experimental Ex Vivo Study.激光手术会干扰颌面部软硬组织中的视神经识别吗?——一项体外实验研究。
Sensors (Basel). 2015 Oct 1;15(10):25416-32. doi: 10.3390/s151025416.
9
A spectroscopic approach to monitor the cut processing in pulsed laser osteotomy.采用光谱法监测脉冲激光截骨术中的切割过程。
Lasers Med Sci. 2013 Jan;28(1):87-92. doi: 10.1007/s10103-012-1078-3. Epub 2012 Mar 9.
10
Optoacoustic imaging based on the interferometric measurement of surface displacement.
J Biomed Opt. 2007 Nov-Dec;12(6):064001. doi: 10.1117/1.2812665.

引用本文的文献

1
Real-time closed-loop tissue-specific laser osteotomy using deep-learning-assisted optical coherence tomography.使用深度学习辅助光学相干断层扫描的实时闭环组织特异性激光截骨术。
Biomed Opt Express. 2023 May 31;14(6):2986-3002. doi: 10.1364/BOE.486660. eCollection 2023 Jun 1.
2
In Vitro and Ectopic In Vivo Studies toward the Utilization of Isolated Human Nasal Chondrocytes for Single-Stage Arthroscopic Cartilage Regeneration Therapy.用于单阶段关节镜下软骨再生治疗的分离人鼻软骨细胞的体外和异位体内研究。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Jun 21;23(13):6900. doi: 10.3390/ijms23136900.
3
Toward optoacoustic sciatic nerve detection using an all-fiber interferometric-based sensor for endoscopic smart laser surgery.
采用基于全光纤干涉的传感器进行内窥智能激光手术中的光电声学坐骨神经检测。
Lasers Surg Med. 2022 Feb;54(2):289-304. doi: 10.1002/lsm.23473. Epub 2021 Sep 4.
4
Optimizing deep bone ablation by means of a microsecond Er:YAG laser and a novel water microjet irrigation system.利用微秒级掺铒钇铝石榴石激光和新型水微射流冲洗系统优化深部骨消融。
Biomed Opt Express. 2020 Nov 19;11(12):7253-7272. doi: 10.1364/BOE.408914. eCollection 2020 Dec 1.
5
Combined Nd:YAG and Er:YAG lasers for real-time closed-loop tissue-specific laser osteotomy.联合钕钇铝石榴石激光和铒钇铝石榴石激光用于实时闭环组织特异性激光截骨术。
Biomed Opt Express. 2020 Mar 4;11(4):1790-1807. doi: 10.1364/BOE.385862. eCollection 2020 Apr 1.