Suppr超能文献

在荷兰,献血者纹身、穿环或针灸后没有增加输血传播感染的风险。

No increased risk of transfusion-transmissible infections after tattooing, body piercing, or acupuncture among blood donors in the Netherlands.

机构信息

Department of Donor Medicine Research, Sanquin Research, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Laboratory of Medical Microbiology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Transfusion. 2019 Aug;59(8):2575-2583. doi: 10.1111/trf.15421. Epub 2019 Jun 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the Netherlands, needle-related events (NREs) including tattoos, piercings, and acupuncture are a reason for temporary blood donor deferral. This study aims to evaluate whether donors with recent NREs had a higher risk of transfusion-transmissible infections (TTIs) compared to donors without recent NREs.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Data from 2006 through 2015 on all blood donation attempts in the Netherlands were collected. Multivariate regression models (for repeated measurements) were used to assess the associations between recent NREs and the acquisition of TTIs. Posttest counseling data were used to determine the most likely risk factor in TTI-positive new and repeat donors.

RESULTS

Recent NREs were documented in 97,518 out of 9,266,036 (1.1%) donation attempts; 14,097 (14.5%) NREs resulted in NRE-based donor deferral. Recent NREs reported pre-donation were not associated with an increased risk for TTIs. A total of 29 out of 287 TTI-positive donors (11 repeat donors, 18 new donors) reported a recent NRE pre- and/or post-donation. Recent NREs, all needle-stick injuries, were the likely route of transmission in 12 out of 287 (4.2%) of TTI-positive donors. The donor health questionnaire (DHQ) identified only 1 out of 12 TTI-linked NREs. Non-return after NRE deferral, any deferral, or no deferral was 24, 15, and 5%, respectively.

DISCUSSION

Recent tattoos, body piercings, or acupuncture were not associated with an increased risk for TTIs in Dutch donors. Given the lower return rates of donors following a temporary NRE-based deferral, we advocate ending blood donor deferral policies for acupuncture, tattooing, and body piercings, but not needle-stick injuries, in countries where these practices can be considered safe.

摘要

背景

在荷兰,与针具相关的事件(NREs),包括纹身、穿孔和针灸,是暂时推迟献血的原因。本研究旨在评估近期有 NREs 的献血者与近期无 NREs 的献血者相比,是否有更高的输血传播感染(TTIs)风险。

研究设计和方法

收集了 2006 年至 2015 年期间荷兰所有献血尝试的数据。使用多变量回归模型(用于重复测量)来评估近期 NREs 与 TTIs 获得之间的关联。通过献血后的咨询数据来确定 TTI 阳性新献血者和重复献血者中最可能的风险因素。

结果

在 9266036 次献血尝试中的 97518 次(1.1%)记录了近期 NREs;14097 次(14.5%)NREs 导致基于 NRE 的献血者推迟。献血前报告的近期 NREs与 TTIs 风险增加无关。在 287 例 TTI 阳性献血者中,共有 29 例(11 例重复献血者,18 例新献血者)报告了近期 NRE 献血前和/或后发生的情况。在 287 例 TTI 阳性献血者中,有 12 例(4.2%)近期 NRE 是经针具传播感染的可能途径,其中均为针刺伤。DHQ 仅在 12 例 TTI 相关 NRE 中识别出 1 例。在 NRE 推迟后、任何推迟后或不推迟后,非返还的比例分别为 24%、15%和 5%。

讨论

荷兰献血者近期的纹身、身体穿孔或针灸与 TTIs 风险增加无关。鉴于临时基于 NRE 的推迟后献血者的返回率较低,我们主张在这些实践被认为是安全的国家,结束对针灸、纹身和身体穿孔的献血者推迟政策,但不应包括针刺伤。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验