• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1.5T 和 3T 下脉冲饱和转移的定量。

Quantification of pulsed saturation transfer at 1.5T and 3T.

机构信息

Department of Physical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Magn Reson Med. 2019 Nov;82(5):1684-1699. doi: 10.1002/mrm.27856. Epub 2019 Jun 22.

DOI:10.1002/mrm.27856
PMID:31228291
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare magnetization transfer (MT) and CEST effects between 1.5T and 3T in phantom and in vivo experiments.

METHODS

A pulsed saturation scheme using block-shaped pulses separated by gaps was used to overcome the single RF amplifier duty cycle limitations of a clinical 1.5T scanner. Modeling was performed by incorporating the extended phase graph formalism into a Bloch-McConnell simulation. Two saturation pulse types (with long and short pulses) were used. Estimated parameters for MT (the semi-solid pool fraction, M ; the semi-solid transverse relaxation time, T ) and CEST (asymmetry; areas) were compared between 1.5T and 3T in phantoms and in the healthy brain.

RESULTS

Improved fits were shown after inclusion of extended phase graphs. Semi-solid pool fractions in phantom (for agar with ammonium chloride) were higher for short compared to long pulses at 3T (by 19% over all concentrations) and higher at 1.5T compared to 3T (by 5%) using short pulses. In the in vivo experiments, differentiation of white and gray matter was seen in the brain at both field strengths with improved white-gray matter contrast at 3T. In white matter, the mean semi-solid fractions were 18 ± 2% at 3T and 15 ± 2% at 1.5T. The CEST asymmetry in white matter was negative (-4.9 ± 0.4%) at 3T and zero (0.0 ± 0.3%) at 1.5T.

CONCLUSIONS

The pulsed saturation method with short pulses, using the extended phase graph formalism in the Bloch McConnell simulations, led to improved model fits to the data, when compared to those without extended phase graphs.

摘要

目的

在体模和活体实验中比较 1.5T 和 3T 之间的磁化转移(MT)和 CEST 效应。

方法

使用由间隙隔开的块状脉冲的脉冲饱和方案克服了临床 1.5T 扫描仪中单个射频放大器工作周期的限制。通过将扩展相位图形式纳入 Bloch-McConnell 模拟中进行建模。使用两种饱和脉冲类型(长脉冲和短脉冲)。在体模和健康大脑中比较了 1.5T 和 3T 之间的 MT(半固体池分数,M;半固体横向弛豫时间,T)和 CEST(不对称;面积)的估计参数。

结果

在包含扩展相位图后,显示出了更好的拟合。在 3T 时,与长脉冲相比,短脉冲下体模(含氯化铵琼脂)中的半固体池分数更高(所有浓度下均高 19%),而在 1.5T 时,与 3T 相比,短脉冲下的半固体池分数更高(高 5%)。在体内实验中,在两种场强下都可以在大脑中看到白质和灰质的分化,在 3T 时,白质-灰质对比度得到改善。在白质中,3T 时的平均半固体分数为 18 ± 2%,1.5T 时为 15 ± 2%。在白质中,CEST 不对称性为-4.9 ± 0.4%(3T)和 0.0 ± 0.3%(1.5T)。

结论

在 Bloch McConnell 模拟中使用短脉冲的脉冲饱和方法,以及扩展相位图形式,与不使用扩展相位图的方法相比,导致数据的模型拟合得到改善。

相似文献

1
Quantification of pulsed saturation transfer at 1.5T and 3T.1.5T 和 3T 下脉冲饱和转移的定量。
Magn Reson Med. 2019 Nov;82(5):1684-1699. doi: 10.1002/mrm.27856. Epub 2019 Jun 22.
2
Understanding quantitative pulsed CEST in the presence of MT.理解存在 MT 时的定量脉冲 CEST。
Magn Reson Med. 2012 Apr;67(4):979-90. doi: 10.1002/mrm.23074. Epub 2011 Aug 19.
3
Quantitative pulsed CEST-MRI at a clinical 3T MRI system.在临床3T磁共振成像系统上进行定量脉冲化学交换饱和转移磁共振成像。
MAGMA. 2017 Oct;30(5):505-516. doi: 10.1007/s10334-017-0625-0. Epub 2017 May 31.
4
Rapid and quantitative chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) imaging with magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF).利用磁共振指纹技术进行快速、定量的化学交换饱和传递(CEST)成像。
Magn Reson Med. 2018 Dec;80(6):2449-2463. doi: 10.1002/mrm.27221. Epub 2018 May 13.
5
B1+ inhomogeneity mitigation in CEST using parallel transmission.使用并行传输减轻 CEST 中的 B1+ 不均匀性。
Magn Reson Med. 2017 Dec;78(6):2216-2225. doi: 10.1002/mrm.26624. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
6
In vivo three-dimensional whole-brain pulsed steady-state chemical exchange saturation transfer at 7 T.7T 下体内三维全脑脉冲稳态化学交换饱和传递。
Magn Reson Med. 2012 Jun;67(6):1579-89. doi: 10.1002/mrm.23141. Epub 2011 Nov 14.
7
Multiple interleaved mode saturation (MIMOSA) for B inhomogeneity mitigation in chemical exchange saturation transfer.化学交换饱和转移中用于减轻 B 不均匀性的多重交错模式饱和(MIMOSA)。
Magn Reson Med. 2019 Aug;82(2):693-705. doi: 10.1002/mrm.27762. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
8
Systematic variation of off-resonance prepulses for clinical magnetization transfer contrast imaging at 0.2, 1.5, and 3.0 tesla.用于0.2、1.5和3.0特斯拉临床磁共振波谱成像的失谐预脉冲的系统变化
Invest Radiol. 2008 Jan;43(1):16-26. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181559949.
9
Simulation, phantom validation, and clinical evaluation of fast pH-weighted molecular imaging using amine chemical exchange saturation transfer echo planar imaging (CEST-EPI) in glioma at 3 T.3T下使用胺化学交换饱和转移回波平面成像(CEST-EPI)对胶质瘤进行快速pH加权分子成像的模拟、体模验证及临床评估
NMR Biomed. 2016 Nov;29(11):1563-1576. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3611. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
10
Systematic Evaluation of Amide Proton Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer at 3 T: Effects of Protein Concentration, pH, and Acquisition Parameters.3T下酰胺质子化学交换饱和转移的系统评估:蛋白质浓度、pH值及采集参数的影响
Invest Radiol. 2016 Oct;51(10):635-46. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000292.

引用本文的文献

1
Chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI for neurodegenerative diseases: An update on clinical and preclinical studies.用于神经退行性疾病的化学交换饱和转移磁共振成像:临床与临床前研究的最新进展
Neural Regen Res. 2026 Feb 1;21(2):553-568. doi: 10.4103/NRR.NRR-D-24-01246. Epub 2025 Jan 29.
2
Towards assessing and improving the reliability of ultrashort echo time quantitative magnetization transfer (UTE-qMT) MRI of cortical bone: In silico and ex vivo study.评估和提高皮质骨超短回波时间定量磁化转移(UTE-qMT)MRI 可靠性的研究:体内模拟和离体研究。
MAGMA. 2024 Dec;37(6):983-992. doi: 10.1007/s10334-024-01190-7. Epub 2024 Aug 10.
3
Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer MRI: What Neuro-Oncology Clinicians Need To Know.
化学交换饱和转移磁共振成像:神经肿瘤临床医生需要了解的知识。
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Jan-Dec;22:15330338231208613. doi: 10.1177/15330338231208613.
4
Repurposing Clinical Agents for Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Current Status and Future Perspectives.临床药物在化学交换饱和转移磁共振成像中的新用途:现状与未来展望
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2020 Dec 24;14(1):11. doi: 10.3390/ph14010011.
5
Quantitative CEST and MT at 1.5T for monitoring treatment response in glioblastoma: early and late tumor progression during chemoradiation.1.5T 下定量 CEST 和 MT 用于监测胶质母细胞瘤的治疗反应:放化疗期间的早期和晚期肿瘤进展。
J Neurooncol. 2021 Jan;151(2):267-278. doi: 10.1007/s11060-020-03661-y. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
6
Does the magnetization transfer effect bias chemical exchange saturation transfer effects? Quantifying chemical exchange saturation transfer in the presence of magnetization transfer.磁化传递效应是否会使化学交换饱和转移效应产生偏差?在存在磁化传递的情况下对化学交换饱和转移进行定量分析。
Magn Reson Med. 2020 Sep;84(3):1359-1375. doi: 10.1002/mrm.28212. Epub 2020 Feb 18.