• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于孟加拉国一个农村地区横断面研究的访谈式世界卫生组织生活质量简表(WHOQOL - BREF)问卷的心理测量学评估:拉施分析的应用

Psychometric evaluation of an interview-administered version of the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire for use in a cross-sectional study of a rural district in Bangladesh: an application of Rasch analysis.

作者信息

Uddin Mohammed Nazim, Islam Fakir M Amirul

机构信息

Department of Statistics, Data Science and Epidemiology; Faculty of Health, Arts and Design; Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC, 3122, Australia.

Organisation for Rural Community Development (ORCD), Dariapur, Narail, Bangladesh.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Apr 5;19(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4026-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-019-4026-0
PMID:30953506
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6451264/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to validate the psychometric properties of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument, Short Form (WHOQOL-BREF) questionnaire for use in a rural district of Bangladesh.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study recruited a multi-stage cluster random sample of 2425 participants from the rural district Narail of Bangladesh in May-July 2017. Rasch analysis was carried out using the sampled participants, as well as multiple validation random sub-samples of 300 participants, to validate four domains of the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire: physical, psychological, social and environmental.

RESULTS

The original WHOQOL-BREF appeared to be a poor fit for both sampled and sub-sampled group of participants in Narail district in all underlying domains: physical, psychological, social and environmental. Two items (sleep and work capacity) from the physical domain, two items (personal belief and negative feelings) from the psychological domain and three items (home environment, health care and transport) from the environment domain were excluded for goodness of fit of the Rasch model. The social domain exhibited reasonably reliable fitness while fulfilling all the assumptions of the Rasch model. A modified version of the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire using five-items for the physical ([Formula: see text] = 36.47, p = 0.013, Person Separation Index (PSI) = 0.773), four-items for the psychological ([Formula: see text] = 28.30, p = 0.029, PSI = 0.708) and five-items for the environmental ([Formula: see text] = 36.97, p = 0.011, PSI = 0.804) domain was applied, which showed adequate internal consistency, reliability, unidimensionality, and similar functioning for different age-sex distributions.

CONCLUSIONS

The modified WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire translated into Bengali language appeared to be a valid tool for measuring quality of life in a typical rural district in Bangladesh. Despite some limitations of the modified WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire, further application of Rasch analysis using this version or an improved one in other representative rural areas of Bangladesh is recommended to assess the external validity of the outcomes of this study and to determine the efficacy of this tool to measure the quality of life at the national rural level.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在验证世界卫生组织生存质量测定量表简表(WHOQOL - BREF)问卷在孟加拉国一个农村地区使用时的心理测量特性。

方法

这项横断面研究于2017年5月至7月从孟加拉国纳赖尔农村地区招募了一个2425名参与者的多阶段整群随机样本。使用抽样参与者以及300名参与者的多个验证随机子样本进行拉施分析,以验证WHOQOL - BREF问卷的四个领域:生理、心理、社会和环境。

结果

在所有潜在领域(生理、心理、社会和环境)中,原始的WHOQOL - BREF问卷对于纳赖尔地区的抽样参与者和子抽样参与者群体而言,拟合度似乎都很差。为使拉施模型拟合良好,从生理领域排除了两个项目(睡眠和工作能力),从心理领域排除了两个项目(个人信念和负面情绪),从环境领域排除了三个项目(家庭环境、医疗保健和交通)。社会领域在满足拉施模型的所有假设时表现出合理可靠的拟合度。应用了一个修改版的WHOQOL - BREF问卷,生理领域使用五个项目([公式:见原文] = 36.47,p = 0.013,个人分离指数(PSI)= 0.773),心理领域使用四个项目([公式:见原文] = 28.30,p = 0.029,PSI = 0.708),环境领域使用五个项目([公式:见原文] = 36.97,p = 0.011,PSI = 0.804),该问卷显示出足够的内部一致性、可靠性、单维性,并且在不同年龄 - 性别分布中功能相似。

结论

翻译成孟加拉语的修改版WHOQOL - BREF问卷似乎是测量孟加拉国一个典型农村地区生活质量的有效工具。尽管修改版WHOQOL - BREF问卷存在一些局限性,但建议在孟加拉国其他有代表性的农村地区使用该版本或改进版本进一步进行拉施分析,以评估本研究结果的外部有效性,并确定该工具在全国农村层面测量生活质量的功效。

相似文献

1
Psychometric evaluation of an interview-administered version of the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire for use in a cross-sectional study of a rural district in Bangladesh: an application of Rasch analysis.用于孟加拉国一个农村地区横断面研究的访谈式世界卫生组织生活质量简表(WHOQOL - BREF)问卷的心理测量学评估:拉施分析的应用
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Apr 5;19(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4026-0.
2
Psychometric evaluation of the modified 19-item Bengali version of WHOQOL scale using Rasch analysis: a cross-sectional study of a rural district in Bangladesh.拉希分析对经改良的 19 项孟加拉语版世界卫生组织生活质量量表的心理测量学评估:孟加拉国一个农村地区的横断面研究。
BMC Psychol. 2020 May 1;8(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s40359-020-00411-7.
3
Psychometric evaluation, using Rasch analysis, of the WHOQOL-BREF in heroin-dependent people undergoing methadone maintenance treatment: further item validation.使用拉施分析对接受美沙酮维持治疗的海洛因依赖者进行世界卫生组织生活质量简表(WHOQOL-BREF)的心理测量评估:进一步的项目验证
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Oct 3;12:148. doi: 10.1186/s12955-014-0148-6.
4
Validation of the WHOQOL-BREF and Shorter Versions Using Rasch Analysis in Traumatic Brain Injury and Orthopedic Populations.使用 Rasch 分析验证 WHOQOL-BREF 及简版在创伤性脑损伤和骨科人群中的适用性。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Oct;100(10):1853-1862. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.05.029. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
5
Psychometric evaluation of the modified Kessler seven-item version (K7) for measuring psychological distress using Rasch analysis: a cross-sectional study in a rural district of Bangladesh.使用 Rasch 分析对改良后的 Kessler 七项版本(K7)进行心理困扰测量的心理计量学评估:孟加拉国农村地区的一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 20;10(2):e034523. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034523.
6
Abbreviated World Health Organization Quality of Life questionnaire (WHOQOL-Bref) in north Indian patients with bronchial asthma: an evaluation using Rasch analysis.简明世界卫生组织生活质量问卷(WHOQOL-Bref)在印度北部支气管哮喘患者中的应用:使用 RASCH 分析进行评估。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2014 Jun 12;24:14001. doi: 10.1038/npjpcrm.2014.1.
7
Psychometric evaluation of an interview-administered version of the Kessler 10-item questionnaire (K10) for measuring psychological distress in rural Bangladesh.对 Kessler 10 项量表(K10)中文版在孟加拉国农村地区进行心理困扰测量的访谈式版本的心理计量学评估。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 30;8(6):e022967. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022967.
8
Validation of the WHOQOL-Bref: psychometric properties and normative data for the Norwegian general population.WHOQOL-Bref 的验证:挪威普通人群的心理测量特性和常模数据。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Jan 7;19(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01656-x.
9
Psychometric evaluation of the WHOQOL-BREF and its shorter versions for general Thai population: confirmatory factor analysis and Rasch analysis.世界卫生组织生活质量简表(WHOQOL - BREF)及其简短版本在泰国普通人群中的心理测量学评估:验证性因素分析和拉施分析
Qual Life Res. 2024 Feb;33(2):335-348. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03521-y. Epub 2023 Oct 31.
10
Psychometric properties of the WHOQOL-BREF(PT) in a sample of elderly citizens.WHOQOL-BREF(PT) 在老年人群体样本中的心理测量学特性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 May 17;19(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01783-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Gender difference in domain-specific quality of life measured by modified WHOQoL-BREF questionnaire and their associated factors among older adults in a rural district in Bangladesh.孟加拉国某农村地区老年人中,通过改良的世界卫生组织生活质量简表(WHOQoL-BREF)测量的特定领域生活质量的性别差异及其相关因素。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 7;20(1):e0317113. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317113. eCollection 2025.
2
Modern psychometric evaluation of Thai WHOQOL-BREF and its shorter versions in patients undergoing warfarin in Thailand: Rasch analysis.泰国华法林患者的泰国 WHOQOL-BREF 及其简短版本的现代心理计量学评估:Rasch 分析。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 4;14(1):20639. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71048-4.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Psychometric evaluation of an interview-administered version of the Kessler 10-item questionnaire (K10) for measuring psychological distress in rural Bangladesh.对 Kessler 10 项量表(K10)中文版在孟加拉国农村地区进行心理困扰测量的访谈式版本的心理计量学评估。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 30;8(6):e022967. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022967.
2
Critical Values for Yen's : Identification of Local Dependence in the Rasch Model Using Residual Correlations.严氏临界值:使用残差相关性识别拉施模型中的局部依赖性
Appl Psychol Meas. 2017 May;41(3):178-194. doi: 10.1177/0146621616677520. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
3
Factor validation and Rasch analysis of the individual recovery outcomes counter.
Psychometric evaluation of the WHOQOL-BREF and its shorter versions for general Thai population: confirmatory factor analysis and Rasch analysis.
世界卫生组织生活质量简表(WHOQOL - BREF)及其简短版本在泰国普通人群中的心理测量学评估:验证性因素分析和拉施分析
Qual Life Res. 2024 Feb;33(2):335-348. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03521-y. Epub 2023 Oct 31.
4
Rasch validation of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS) in community-dwelling adults.社区居民成年人的华威-爱丁堡心理幸福感量表(WEMWBS)的 Rasch 验证。
BMC Psychol. 2023 Feb 17;11(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01058-w.
5
Physical body experiences questionnaire simplified for active aging (PBE-QAG): Rasch validation.身体体验问卷简化版用于积极老龄化(PBE-QAG):Rasch 验证。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 10;18(2):e0280198. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280198. eCollection 2023.
6
Assessing the dimensionality of scores derived from the Revised Formal Thought Disorder Self-Report Scale in schizotypy.评估修正后的正式思维障碍自评量表在精神分裂症特质中的得分维度。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 9;17(12):e0278841. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278841. eCollection 2022.
7
Psychometric evaluation of the modified 19-item Bengali version of WHOQOL scale using Rasch analysis: a cross-sectional study of a rural district in Bangladesh.拉希分析对经改良的 19 项孟加拉语版世界卫生组织生活质量量表的心理测量学评估:孟加拉国一个农村地区的横断面研究。
BMC Psychol. 2020 May 1;8(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s40359-020-00411-7.
8
Psychometric evaluation of the modified Kessler seven-item version (K7) for measuring psychological distress using Rasch analysis: a cross-sectional study in a rural district of Bangladesh.使用 Rasch 分析对改良后的 Kessler 七项版本(K7)进行心理困扰测量的心理计量学评估:孟加拉国农村地区的一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 20;10(2):e034523. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034523.
9
An assessment of awareness of mental health conditions and its association with socio-demographic characteristics: a cross-sectional study in a rural district in Bangladesh.一项关于心理健康状况意识及其与社会人口特征关联的评估:孟加拉国一个农村地区的横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Aug 13;19(1):562. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4385-6.
个体康复结果计数器的因素验证与拉施分析。
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Jan;41(1):74-85. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1375030. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
4
Psychological distress and quality of life: rationale and protocol of a prospective cohort study in a rural district in Bangaladesh.心理困扰与生活质量:孟加拉国一个农村地区前瞻性队列研究的基本原理与方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 1;7(9):e016745. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016745.
5
Sample Size and Statistical Conclusions from Tests of Fit to the Rasch Model According to the Rasch Unidimensional Measurement Model (Rumm) Program in Health Outcome Measurement.根据健康结果测量中的拉施单维测量模型(Rumm)程序,样本量与拉施模型拟合检验的统计结论
J Appl Meas. 2016;17(4):416-431.
6
Health-Related Quality of Life Among Tuberculosis Patients in Pakistan: A Cross Sectional Study Using WHOQOL-BREF.巴基斯坦结核病患者的健康相关生活质量:一项使用世界卫生组织生活质量简表的横断面研究。
Value Health. 2014 Nov;17(7):A601-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.08.2086. Epub 2014 Oct 26.
7
Psychometric properties of the stroke specific quality of life scale for the assessment of participation in stroke survivors using the rasch model: a preliminary study.使用拉施模型评估中风幸存者参与情况的中风特定生活质量量表的心理测量特性:一项初步研究。
J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Feb;27(2):389-92. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.389. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
8
Development and validation of the Somali WHOQOL-BREF among refugees living in the USA.索马里版世界卫生组织生活质量简表(WHOQOL-BREF)在美国难民中的开发与验证
Qual Life Res. 2015 Jun;24(6):1503-13. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0877-3. Epub 2014 Nov 28.
9
Psychometric evaluation, using Rasch analysis, of the WHOQOL-BREF in heroin-dependent people undergoing methadone maintenance treatment: further item validation.使用拉施分析对接受美沙酮维持治疗的海洛因依赖者进行世界卫生组织生活质量简表(WHOQOL-BREF)的心理测量评估:进一步的项目验证
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Oct 3;12:148. doi: 10.1186/s12955-014-0148-6.
10
Abbreviated World Health Organization Quality of Life questionnaire (WHOQOL-Bref) in north Indian patients with bronchial asthma: an evaluation using Rasch analysis.简明世界卫生组织生活质量问卷(WHOQOL-Bref)在印度北部支气管哮喘患者中的应用:使用 RASCH 分析进行评估。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2014 Jun 12;24:14001. doi: 10.1038/npjpcrm.2014.1.