• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Rivermead脑震荡后症状问卷是评估创伤性脑损伤和骨科损伤患者长期症状的可靠有效工具吗?一项使用Rasch分析的新研究。

Is the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire a Reliable and Valid Measure to Assess Long-Term Symptoms in Traumatic Brain Injury and Orthopedic Injury Patients? A Novel Investigation Using Rasch Analysis.

作者信息

Balalla Shivanthi, Krägeloh Chris, Medvedev Oleg, Siegert Richard

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Auckland University of Technology, Northcote, Auckland, New Zealand.

School of Psychology, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.

出版信息

Neurotrauma Rep. 2020 Aug 11;1(1):63-72. doi: 10.1089/neur.2020.0017. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1089/neur.2020.0017
PMID:34223531
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8240882/
Abstract

Persistent post-concussion syndrome (PCS) symptoms are known to last years after traumatic brain injury (TBI), and similar symptoms are increasingly being documented among those who have not experienced a TBI. There remains however, a dearth of empirical evidence on the structural composition of symptoms beyond the post-acute symptom phase after TBI, and little is known about the potential use of PCS symptom scales to measure PCS-like symptoms in non-TBI individuals. Our objective was therefore to examine the psychometric performance and dimensionality of the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ) as a measure of long-term PCS symptoms among a TBI and non-TBI sample. A case-control sample of 223 patients with injury, consisting of age- and sex-matched TBI participants ( = 109) and orthopedic participants ( = 114) were recruited from a regional trauma registry in New Zealand (NZ), and assessed at mean 2.5 years post-injury. Results from the Rasch analysis showed that the RPQ achieved fit to the Rasch model, demonstrating very good reliability (Person Separation Index [PSI] = 0.87), thereby indicating that the measure can be used reliably for individual and group assessment of symptoms among both TBI and orthopedic patients. In this study we demonstrated evidence of a unidimensional construct of PCS symptoms in both groups, which helps alleviate previous uncertainty about factor structure, and permits the calculation of a total RPQ score. Conversion of ordinal to interval total scores presented within are recommended for clinicians and researchers, to improve instrument precision, and to facilitate the interpretation of change scores and use of parametric methods in data analysis.

摘要

持续性脑震荡后综合征(PCS)症状已知会在创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后持续数年,并且在未经历过TBI的人群中也越来越多地记录到类似症状。然而,对于TBI后急性症状期之外症状的结构组成,仍然缺乏实证证据,并且对于PCS症状量表在测量非TBI个体中PCS样症状的潜在用途知之甚少。因此,我们的目标是检验Rivermead脑震荡后症状问卷(RPQ)作为TBI和非TBI样本中长期PCS症状测量工具的心理测量性能和维度。从新西兰(NZ)的一个区域创伤登记处招募了223名受伤患者的病例对照样本,包括年龄和性别匹配的TBI参与者(n = 109)和骨科参与者(n = 114),并在受伤后平均2.5年进行评估。拉施分析结果表明,RPQ符合拉施模型,显示出非常好的信度(个人分离指数[PSI]=0.87),从而表明该测量工具可可靠地用于TBI和骨科患者症状的个体和组间评估。在本研究中,我们证明了两组中PCS症状的单维结构,这有助于减轻先前关于因子结构的不确定性,并允许计算RPQ总分。建议临床医生和研究人员将文中给出的顺序总分转换为区间总分,以提高工具的精度,并便于解释变化分数和在数据分析中使用参数方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9587/8240882/9d80a0ae2e1b/neur.2020.0017_figure1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9587/8240882/9d80a0ae2e1b/neur.2020.0017_figure1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9587/8240882/9d80a0ae2e1b/neur.2020.0017_figure1.jpg

相似文献

1
Is the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire a Reliable and Valid Measure to Assess Long-Term Symptoms in Traumatic Brain Injury and Orthopedic Injury Patients? A Novel Investigation Using Rasch Analysis.Rivermead脑震荡后症状问卷是评估创伤性脑损伤和骨科损伤患者长期症状的可靠有效工具吗?一项使用Rasch分析的新研究。
Neurotrauma Rep. 2020 Aug 11;1(1):63-72. doi: 10.1089/neur.2020.0017. eCollection 2020.
2
Applicability and clinical utility of the German rivermead post-concussion symptoms questionnaire in proxies of children after traumatic brain injury: an instrument validation study.德国 Rivermead 脑外伤后综合征问卷在儿童创伤性脑损伤后代表中的适用性和临床实用性:一项仪器验证研究。
BMC Neurol. 2024 Apr 19;24(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12883-024-03587-2.
3
Construct validity and reliability of the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire.Rivermead脑震荡后症状问卷的结构效度和信度
Clin Rehabil. 2005 Dec;19(8):878-87. doi: 10.1191/0269215505cr905oa.
4
The psychometric validation of the Dutch version of the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ) after traumatic brain injury (TBI).创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后荷兰版 Rivermead 脑震荡后症状问卷(RPQ)的心理测量验证。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 24;14(10):e0210138. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210138. eCollection 2019.
5
Influence of Sociodemographic, Premorbid, and Injury-Related Factors on Post-Concussion Symptoms after Traumatic Brain Injury.社会人口学、病前及损伤相关因素对创伤性脑损伤后创伤后症状的影响。
J Clin Med. 2020 Jun 19;9(6):1931. doi: 10.3390/jcm9061931.
6
Linking Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ) and Sport Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT) scores with item response theory.将 Rivermead 脑震荡后症状问卷 (RPQ) 和运动性脑震荡评估工具 (SCAT) 评分与项目反应理论相关联。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2023 Aug;29(7):696-703. doi: 10.1017/S1355617722000807. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
7
Psychometric Properties of the German Version of the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire in Adolescents after Traumatic Brain Injury and Their Proxies.德国版Rivermead脑震荡后症状问卷在创伤性脑损伤青少年及其代理人中的心理测量学特性
J Clin Med. 2022 Dec 31;12(1):319. doi: 10.3390/jcm12010319.
8
Validation of the WHOQOL-BREF and Shorter Versions Using Rasch Analysis in Traumatic Brain Injury and Orthopedic Populations.使用 Rasch 分析验证 WHOQOL-BREF 及简版在创伤性脑损伤和骨科人群中的适用性。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Oct;100(10):1853-1862. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.05.029. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
9
Long-term factor structure of the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptom Questionnaire in mild traumatic brain injury and normative sample.米德脑震荡后症状问卷在轻度创伤性脑损伤及常模样本中的长期因素结构
Brain Inj. 2019;33(5):618-622. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2019.1570339. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
10
Reference Values for the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ) from General Population Samples in the United Kingdom, Italy, and The Netherlands.英国、意大利和荷兰普通人群样本的Rivermead脑震荡后症状问卷(RPQ)参考值。
J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 9;11(16):4658. doi: 10.3390/jcm11164658.

引用本文的文献

1
Depression Symptoms Associated With Clinical Symptoms, Disability, and Functional Connectivity After Traumatic Brain Injury.创伤性脑损伤后与临床症状、残疾及功能连接相关的抑郁症状
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2025 Jun 13:appineuropsych20240262. doi: 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.20240262.
2
Frequency and predictors of headache in the first 12 months after traumatic brain injury: results from CENTER-TBI.颅脑创伤后 12 个月内头痛的频率和预测因素:CENTER-TBI 的研究结果。
J Headache Pain. 2024 Mar 25;25(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s10194-024-01751-0.
3
Network analysis applied to post-concussion symptoms in two mild traumatic brain injury samples.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of the Fear Avoidance Behavior after Traumatic Brain Injury Questionnaire.创伤性脑损伤后恐惧回避行为评定量表的评估。
J Neurotrauma. 2020 Jul 1;37(13):1566-1573. doi: 10.1089/neu.2019.6729. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
2
Validation of the WHOQOL-BREF and Shorter Versions Using Rasch Analysis in Traumatic Brain Injury and Orthopedic Populations.使用 Rasch 分析验证 WHOQOL-BREF 及简版在创伤性脑损伤和骨科人群中的适用性。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Oct;100(10):1853-1862. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.05.029. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
3
Network Analysis and Precision Rehabilitation for the Post-concussion Syndrome.
网络分析应用于两个轻度创伤性脑损伤样本中的脑震荡后症状。
Front Neurol. 2023 Jul 20;14:1226367. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1226367. eCollection 2023.
4
Pilot study protocol of a randomized controlled trial for the potential effects of creatine monohydrate on persistent post-concussive symptoms.一项关于一水肌酸对持续性脑震荡后症状潜在影响的随机对照试验的初步研究方案。
Front Neurol. 2023 Jul 5;14:1209548. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1209548. eCollection 2023.
5
Responsiveness of the Post-Concussion Symptom Scale to Monitor Clinical Recovery After Concussion or Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.脑震荡后症状量表对监测脑震荡或轻度创伤性脑损伤后临床恢复情况的反应性。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 Oct 12;10(10):23259671221127049. doi: 10.1177/23259671221127049. eCollection 2022 Oct.
6
Interdisciplinary Rehabilitation for Concussion Recovery (i-RECOveR): protocol of an investigator-blinded, randomised, case series with multiple baseline design to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a 12-week treatment for persistent post-concussion symptoms.脑震荡康复的多学科康复治疗(i-RECOveR):一项研究者设盲、随机、具有多重基线设计的病例系列研究方案,以评估针对持续性脑震荡后症状进行为期12周治疗的可行性和初步疗效。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022 Sep 5;8(1):198. doi: 10.1186/s40814-022-01153-6.
7
Post-Concussion Symptoms Rule: Derivation and Validation of a Clinical Decision Rule for Early Prediction of Persistent Symptoms after a Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.脑震荡后症状规则:一种用于早期预测轻度创伤性脑损伤后持续症状的临床决策规则的推导和验证。
J Neurotrauma. 2022 Oct;39(19-20):1349-1362. doi: 10.1089/neu.2022.0026. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
8
Memory Perfectionism is Associated with Persistent Memory Complaints after Concussion.记忆完美主义与脑震荡后持续的记忆抱怨有关。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2022 Aug 23;37(6):1177-1184. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acac021.
9
Hippocampal and rostral anterior cingulate blood flow is associated with affective symptoms in chronic traumatic brain injury.海马和额前扣带回前部血流与慢性创伤性脑损伤的情感症状有关。
Brain Res. 2021 Nov 15;1771:147631. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2021.147631. Epub 2021 Aug 28.
脑震荡后综合征的网络分析与精准康复
Front Neurol. 2019 May 29;10:489. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00489. eCollection 2019.
4
Long-term factor structure of the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptom Questionnaire in mild traumatic brain injury and normative sample.米德脑震荡后症状问卷在轻度创伤性脑损伤及常模样本中的长期因素结构
Brain Inj. 2019;33(5):618-622. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2019.1570339. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
5
Distinguishing between enduring and dynamic concussion symptoms: applying Generalisability Theory to the Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ).区分持续性和动态性脑震荡症状:将概化理论应用于里弗米德脑震荡后症状问卷(RPQ)
PeerJ. 2018 Sep 28;6:e5676. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5676. eCollection 2018.
6
Prediction of Persistent Post-Concussion Symptoms after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.轻度创伤性脑损伤后持续性脑震荡后症状的预测。
J Neurotrauma. 2018 Nov 15;35(22):2691-2698. doi: 10.1089/neu.2017.5486. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
7
Population-based cohort study of the impacts of mild traumatic brain injury in adults four years post-injury.基于人群的队列研究:成人轻度创伤性脑损伤后四年的影响
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 31;13(1):e0191655. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191655. eCollection 2018.
8
Factor structure of the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire over the first year following mild traumatic brain injury.轻度创伤性脑损伤后第一年里Rivermead脑震荡后症状问卷的因子结构。
Brain Inj. 2018;32(4):453-458. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2018.1429659. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
9
Divergent Classification Methods of Post-Concussion Syndrome after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Prevalence Rates, Risk Factors, and Functional Outcome.轻度创伤性脑损伤后脑震荡后综合征的不同分类方法:患病率、危险因素和功能预后。
J Neurotrauma. 2018 Jun 1;35(11):1233-1241. doi: 10.1089/neu.2017.5257. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
10
Longitudinal Study of Postconcussion Syndrome: Not Everyone Recovers.脑震荡后综合征的纵向研究:并非所有人都能康复。
J Neurotrauma. 2017 Apr 15;34(8):1511-1523. doi: 10.1089/neu.2016.4677. Epub 2016 Nov 29.