• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在焦虑障碍中统一治疗抵抗的多种定义:系统综述。

Aligning the many definitions of treatment resistance in anxiety disorders: A systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Psychiatry, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

GGZ inGeest Specialized Mental Health Care, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Depress Anxiety. 2019 Sep;36(9):801-812. doi: 10.1002/da.22895. Epub 2019 Jun 23.

DOI:10.1002/da.22895
PMID:31231925
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6771798/
Abstract

Anxiety Disorders often show a chronic course, even when treated with one of the various effective treatments available. Lack of treatment effect could be due to Treatment Resistance (TR). Consensus on a definition for TR Anxiety Disorders (TR-AD) is highly needed as currently many different operationalizations are in use. Therefore, generalizability in current TR-AD research is suboptimal, hampering improvement of clinical care. The objective of this review is to evaluate the currently used definitions of TR-AD by performing a systematic review of available literature. Out of a total of n = 13 042, 62 studies that operationalized TR-AD were included. The current review confirms a lack of consensus on TR-AD criteria. In 62.9% of the definitions, TR was deemed present after the first treatment failure. Most studies (93.0%) required pharmacological treatment failures, whereas few (29.0%) required psychological treatment failures. However, criteria for what constitutes "treatment failure" were not provided in the majority of studies (58.1%). Definitions for minimal treatment duration ranged from at least 4 weeks to at least 6 months. Almost half of the TR-AD definitions (46.8%) required elevated anxiety severity levels in TR-AD. After synthesis of the results, the consensus definition considers TR-AD present after both at least one first-line pharmacological and one psychological treatment failure, provided for an adequate duration (at least 8 weeks) with anxiety severity remaining above a specified threshold. This definition could contribute to improving course prediction and identifying more targeted treatment options for the highly burdened subgroup of TR-AD patients.

摘要

焦虑障碍即使经过各种有效治疗之一的治疗,也常常表现为慢性病程。治疗无效可能是由于治疗抵抗 (TR)。由于目前正在使用许多不同的操作定义,因此非常需要对 TR 焦虑障碍 (TR-AD) 达成共识。目前,TR-AD 研究中的可推广性欠佳,阻碍了临床护理的改善。本综述的目的是通过对现有文献进行系统评价,评估目前用于 TR-AD 的定义。在总共 n = 13042 中,纳入了 62 项操作化 TR-AD 的研究。目前的综述证实,TR-AD 标准缺乏共识。在 62.9%的定义中,首次治疗失败后被认为存在 TR。大多数研究(93.0%)需要药物治疗失败,而很少(29.0%)需要心理治疗失败。然而,大多数研究(58.1%)没有提供“治疗失败”的标准。治疗持续时间的最低标准范围从至少 4 周到至少 6 个月。近一半的 TR-AD 定义(46.8%)要求 TR-AD 中的焦虑严重程度升高。对结果进行综合后,共识定义认为,在至少一次一线药物和一次心理治疗失败后,在足够的时间(至少 8 周)内,且焦虑严重程度保持在特定阈值以上,即存在 TR-AD。该定义有助于改善病程预测,并为 TR-AD 患者这一负担沉重的亚组确定更有针对性的治疗选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81db/6771798/e86162264c0c/DA-36-801-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81db/6771798/e86162264c0c/DA-36-801-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81db/6771798/e86162264c0c/DA-36-801-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Aligning the many definitions of treatment resistance in anxiety disorders: A systematic review.在焦虑障碍中统一治疗抵抗的多种定义:系统综述。
Depress Anxiety. 2019 Sep;36(9):801-812. doi: 10.1002/da.22895. Epub 2019 Jun 23.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
The definition of treatment resistance in anxiety disorders: a Delphi method-based consensus guideline.焦虑症治疗抵抗的定义:基于德尔菲法的共识指南。
World Psychiatry. 2024 Feb;23(1):113-123. doi: 10.1002/wps.21177.
4
CBT for pharmacotherapy non-remitters--a systematic review of a next-step strategy.药物治疗无缓解者的认知行为治疗-下一步策略的系统评价。
J Affect Disord. 2011 Mar;129(1-3):219-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2010.08.025. Epub 2010 Sep 21.
5
Therapist-supported Internet cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in adults.成人焦虑症的治疗师辅助互联网认知行为疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 5(3):CD011565. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011565.
6
Long-term outcome of cognitive behaviour therapy clinical trials in central Scotland.苏格兰中部认知行为疗法临床试验的长期结果。
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Nov;9(42):1-174. doi: 10.3310/hta9420.
7
Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Major Depression and Anxiety Disorders: A Health Technology Assessment.互联网提供的针对重度抑郁症和焦虑症的认知行为疗法:一项卫生技术评估。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2019 Feb 19;19(6):1-199. eCollection 2019.
8
Non-pharmacological interventions for somatoform disorders and medically unexplained physical symptoms (MUPS) in adults.成人躯体形式障碍和医学无法解释的身体症状(MUPS)的非药物干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 1;2014(11):CD011142. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011142.pub2.
9
Effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for child and adolescent anxiety disorders across different CBT modalities and comparisons: a systematic review and meta-analysis.认知行为疗法(CBT)针对不同CBT模式治疗儿童和青少年焦虑症的有效性及比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Nord J Psychiatry. 2020 Apr;74(3):168-180. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2019.1686653. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
10
Prevalence of Autism Spectrum Disorder Among Children Aged 8 Years - Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, 11 Sites, United States, 2014.8 岁儿童自闭症谱系障碍患病率 - 自闭症及发育障碍监测网,美国 11 个监测点,2014 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2018 Apr 27;67(6):1-23. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6706a1.

引用本文的文献

1
Associations of cMIND Diet with depressive and anxiety symptoms among old people in China: a nationwide study.中国老年人中cMIND饮食与抑郁和焦虑症状的关联:一项全国性研究。
Eur J Nutr. 2025 Mar 12;64(3):122. doi: 10.1007/s00394-025-03628-7.
2
Ketamine for treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder: Double-blind active-controlled crossover study.氯胺酮治疗难治性强迫症:双盲活性对照交叉研究。
J Psychopharmacol. 2025 Jan;39(1):23-28. doi: 10.1177/02698811241301215. Epub 2024 Nov 28.
3
Is lack of goal-conflict-specific rhythmicity a biomarker for treatment resistance in generalised anxiety but not social anxiety or major depression?

本文引用的文献

1
Systematic review and meta-analysis: Dose-response curve of SSRIs and SNRIs in anxiety disorders.系统评价和荟萃分析:SSRIs 和 SNRIs 在焦虑障碍中的剂量-反应关系。
Depress Anxiety. 2019 Mar;36(3):198-212. doi: 10.1002/da.22854. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
2
Safety and efficacy of maintenance ketamine treatment in patients with treatment-refractory generalised anxiety and social anxiety disorders.在治疗抵抗的广泛性焦虑和社交焦虑障碍患者中维持氯胺酮治疗的安全性和疗效。
J Psychopharmacol. 2018 Jun;32(6):663-667. doi: 10.1177/0269881118762073. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
3
Cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety and related disorders: A meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials.
缺乏目标冲突特异性节律性是否是广泛性焦虑而非社交焦虑或重度抑郁症治疗抵抗的生物标志物?
J Psychopharmacol. 2024 Sep;38(9):789-797. doi: 10.1177/02698811241275627. Epub 2024 Sep 2.
4
[Non-response to psychotherapy: concepts, problems and referral options].[对心理治疗无反应:概念、问题及转诊选择]
Nervenarzt. 2024 May;95(5):440-447. doi: 10.1007/s00115-024-01633-5. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
5
[Treatment resistance in anxiety disorders-Definition and treatment options].[焦虑症的治疗抵抗——定义与治疗选择]
Nervenarzt. 2024 May;95(5):407-415. doi: 10.1007/s00115-024-01627-3. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
6
The definition of treatment resistance in anxiety disorders: a Delphi method-based consensus guideline.焦虑症治疗抵抗的定义:基于德尔菲法的共识指南。
World Psychiatry. 2024 Feb;23(1):113-123. doi: 10.1002/wps.21177.
7
Individual cognitive therapy reduces frontal-thalamic resting-state functional connectivity in social anxiety disorder.个体认知疗法可降低社交焦虑障碍患者额叶-丘脑静息态功能连接性。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Dec 21;14:1233564. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1233564. eCollection 2023.
8
Preliminary Evaluation of Translated and Culturally Adapted Internet-Delivered Cognitive Therapy for Social Anxiety Disorder: Multicenter, Single-Arm Trial in Japan.针对社交焦虑障碍的翻译及文化适应性网络认知行为疗法的初步评估:日本多中心单臂试验
JMIR Form Res. 2023 May 5;7:e45136. doi: 10.2196/45136.
9
Right Frontal Theta: Is It a Response Biomarker for Ketamine's Therapeutic Action in Anxiety Disorders?右额叶θ波:它是氯胺酮治疗焦虑症的反应生物标志物吗?
Front Neurosci. 2022 Jul 4;16:900105. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.900105. eCollection 2022.
10
Neuropsychological Theory as a Basis for Clinical Translation of Animal Models of Neuropsychiatric Disorder.神经心理学理论作为神经精神疾病动物模型临床转化的基础
Front Behav Neurosci. 2022 May 10;16:877633. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.877633. eCollection 2022.
焦虑及相关障碍的认知行为治疗:随机安慰剂对照试验的荟萃分析。
Depress Anxiety. 2018 Jun;35(6):502-514. doi: 10.1002/da.22728. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
4
Validity of the Maudsley Staging Method in Predicting Treatment-Resistant Depression Outcome Using the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety.《荷兰抑郁和焦虑研究》中马绍尔分期方法对预测治疗抵抗性抑郁症结局的有效性。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2018 Jan/Feb;79(1). doi: 10.4088/JCP.17m11475.
5
Management of Treatment-Resistant Panic Disorder.难治性惊恐障碍的管理
Curr Treat Options Psychiatry. 2017;4(4):371-386. doi: 10.1007/s40501-017-0128-7. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
6
Effect of ketamine dose on self-rated dissociation in patients with treatment refractory anxiety disorders.氯胺酮剂量对治疗抵抗性焦虑障碍患者自我报告的分离体验的影响。
J Psychopharmacol. 2017 Oct;31(10):1306-1311. doi: 10.1177/0269881117725685. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
7
Defining Treatment-Resistant Depression.定义难治性抑郁症。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Jul 1;74(7):758-759. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.0967.
8
Ketamine's dose-related effects on anxiety symptoms in patients with treatment refractory anxiety disorders.氯胺酮对治疗抵抗性焦虑障碍患者焦虑症状的剂量相关影响。
J Psychopharmacol. 2017 Oct;31(10):1302-1305. doi: 10.1177/0269881117705089. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
9
Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia: Treatment Response and Resistance in Psychosis (TRRIP) Working Group Consensus Guidelines on Diagnosis and Terminology.难治性精神分裂症:精神病治疗反应与抵抗(TRRIP)工作组关于诊断和术语的共识指南
Am J Psychiatry. 2017 Mar 1;174(3):216-229. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.16050503. Epub 2016 Dec 6.
10
Toward an Evidence-Based, Operational Definition of Treatment-Resistant Depression: When Enough Is Enough.迈向基于证据的难治性抑郁症操作性定义:何时才够。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Jan 1;74(1):9-10. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.2586.