Suppr超能文献

在焦虑障碍中统一治疗抵抗的多种定义:系统综述。

Aligning the many definitions of treatment resistance in anxiety disorders: A systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Psychiatry, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

GGZ inGeest Specialized Mental Health Care, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Depress Anxiety. 2019 Sep;36(9):801-812. doi: 10.1002/da.22895. Epub 2019 Jun 23.

Abstract

Anxiety Disorders often show a chronic course, even when treated with one of the various effective treatments available. Lack of treatment effect could be due to Treatment Resistance (TR). Consensus on a definition for TR Anxiety Disorders (TR-AD) is highly needed as currently many different operationalizations are in use. Therefore, generalizability in current TR-AD research is suboptimal, hampering improvement of clinical care. The objective of this review is to evaluate the currently used definitions of TR-AD by performing a systematic review of available literature. Out of a total of n = 13 042, 62 studies that operationalized TR-AD were included. The current review confirms a lack of consensus on TR-AD criteria. In 62.9% of the definitions, TR was deemed present after the first treatment failure. Most studies (93.0%) required pharmacological treatment failures, whereas few (29.0%) required psychological treatment failures. However, criteria for what constitutes "treatment failure" were not provided in the majority of studies (58.1%). Definitions for minimal treatment duration ranged from at least 4 weeks to at least 6 months. Almost half of the TR-AD definitions (46.8%) required elevated anxiety severity levels in TR-AD. After synthesis of the results, the consensus definition considers TR-AD present after both at least one first-line pharmacological and one psychological treatment failure, provided for an adequate duration (at least 8 weeks) with anxiety severity remaining above a specified threshold. This definition could contribute to improving course prediction and identifying more targeted treatment options for the highly burdened subgroup of TR-AD patients.

摘要

焦虑障碍即使经过各种有效治疗之一的治疗,也常常表现为慢性病程。治疗无效可能是由于治疗抵抗 (TR)。由于目前正在使用许多不同的操作定义,因此非常需要对 TR 焦虑障碍 (TR-AD) 达成共识。目前,TR-AD 研究中的可推广性欠佳,阻碍了临床护理的改善。本综述的目的是通过对现有文献进行系统评价,评估目前用于 TR-AD 的定义。在总共 n = 13042 中,纳入了 62 项操作化 TR-AD 的研究。目前的综述证实,TR-AD 标准缺乏共识。在 62.9%的定义中,首次治疗失败后被认为存在 TR。大多数研究(93.0%)需要药物治疗失败,而很少(29.0%)需要心理治疗失败。然而,大多数研究(58.1%)没有提供“治疗失败”的标准。治疗持续时间的最低标准范围从至少 4 周到至少 6 个月。近一半的 TR-AD 定义(46.8%)要求 TR-AD 中的焦虑严重程度升高。对结果进行综合后,共识定义认为,在至少一次一线药物和一次心理治疗失败后,在足够的时间(至少 8 周)内,且焦虑严重程度保持在特定阈值以上,即存在 TR-AD。该定义有助于改善病程预测,并为 TR-AD 患者这一负担沉重的亚组确定更有针对性的治疗选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81db/6771798/e86162264c0c/DA-36-801-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验