Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Psychiatry, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
GGZ inGeest Specialized Mental Health Care, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Depress Anxiety. 2019 Sep;36(9):801-812. doi: 10.1002/da.22895. Epub 2019 Jun 23.
Anxiety Disorders often show a chronic course, even when treated with one of the various effective treatments available. Lack of treatment effect could be due to Treatment Resistance (TR). Consensus on a definition for TR Anxiety Disorders (TR-AD) is highly needed as currently many different operationalizations are in use. Therefore, generalizability in current TR-AD research is suboptimal, hampering improvement of clinical care. The objective of this review is to evaluate the currently used definitions of TR-AD by performing a systematic review of available literature. Out of a total of n = 13 042, 62 studies that operationalized TR-AD were included. The current review confirms a lack of consensus on TR-AD criteria. In 62.9% of the definitions, TR was deemed present after the first treatment failure. Most studies (93.0%) required pharmacological treatment failures, whereas few (29.0%) required psychological treatment failures. However, criteria for what constitutes "treatment failure" were not provided in the majority of studies (58.1%). Definitions for minimal treatment duration ranged from at least 4 weeks to at least 6 months. Almost half of the TR-AD definitions (46.8%) required elevated anxiety severity levels in TR-AD. After synthesis of the results, the consensus definition considers TR-AD present after both at least one first-line pharmacological and one psychological treatment failure, provided for an adequate duration (at least 8 weeks) with anxiety severity remaining above a specified threshold. This definition could contribute to improving course prediction and identifying more targeted treatment options for the highly burdened subgroup of TR-AD patients.
焦虑障碍即使经过各种有效治疗之一的治疗,也常常表现为慢性病程。治疗无效可能是由于治疗抵抗 (TR)。由于目前正在使用许多不同的操作定义,因此非常需要对 TR 焦虑障碍 (TR-AD) 达成共识。目前,TR-AD 研究中的可推广性欠佳,阻碍了临床护理的改善。本综述的目的是通过对现有文献进行系统评价,评估目前用于 TR-AD 的定义。在总共 n = 13042 中,纳入了 62 项操作化 TR-AD 的研究。目前的综述证实,TR-AD 标准缺乏共识。在 62.9%的定义中,首次治疗失败后被认为存在 TR。大多数研究(93.0%)需要药物治疗失败,而很少(29.0%)需要心理治疗失败。然而,大多数研究(58.1%)没有提供“治疗失败”的标准。治疗持续时间的最低标准范围从至少 4 周到至少 6 个月。近一半的 TR-AD 定义(46.8%)要求 TR-AD 中的焦虑严重程度升高。对结果进行综合后,共识定义认为,在至少一次一线药物和一次心理治疗失败后,在足够的时间(至少 8 周)内,且焦虑严重程度保持在特定阈值以上,即存在 TR-AD。该定义有助于改善病程预测,并为 TR-AD 患者这一负担沉重的亚组确定更有针对性的治疗选择。