Department of Laboratory Medicine, University-Hospital of Padova, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128 Padova, Italy.
Department of Neuroscience DNS, University-Hospital of Padova, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128 Padova, Italy.
Clin Chim Acta. 2019 Sep;496:117-120. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2019.06.016. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
The detection of IgG oligoclonal bands (OCBs) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is, as yet, the recommended biochemical marker for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS). Aim of this study was to investigate the behaviour of free light chains (FLC) in OCBs negative (OCBs-) MS patients compared with that in OCBs positive (OCBs+) MS patients and in a control group (CG) of subjects without cerebrospinal inflammatory disease. At multiple comparisons between the three groups, statistically significant differences (p < .001 for all) were found for κFLC. Conversely, λFLC values evidenced a greater overlapping in the three groups. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves made with κFLC values, evidenced the greater differences of areas under curves (AUCs) between OCBs- and OCBs+ (AUCs: κFLC 0.98, QκFLC 0.98, κFLC index 0.96) with respect to the differences between OCBs- and CG (AUCs: κFLC 0.77, QκFLC 0.86, κFLC index 0.77): indeed >50% of MS OCBs- subjects studied evidenced the same values of κFLC, QκFLC and κFLC index found in CG. Conversely, if the aim is to select MS subjects while avoiding undertaking the more complex isoelectrofocusing test, values with absolute specificity for MS (QκFLC = 15, sensitivity = 0.76 and κFLCindex = 3.09, sensitivity = 0.72) could be used. The values found in this study call for confirmation with data from more subjects, including those with other CSF inflammatory diseases. Anyway, the most important finding was that, for some OCBs- subjects, κFLC are more effective than OCBs in diagnosing MS.
脑脊液(CSF)中 IgG 寡克隆带(OCB)的检测是目前诊断多发性硬化症(MS)的推荐生化标志物。本研究旨在比较 OCB 阴性(OCB-)MS 患者与 OCB 阳性(OCB+)MS 患者及无中枢神经系统炎症疾病对照组(CG)的游离轻链(FLC)的行为。在三组间的多重比较中,κFLC 存在统计学显著差异(p<0.001 所有)。相反,λFLC 值在三组间存在更大的重叠。κFLC 值的 ROC 曲线表明,曲线下面积(AUC)之间的差异在 OCB-和 OCB+之间更大(AUC:κFLC 0.98,QκFLC 0.98,κFLC 指数 0.96),而 OCB-和 CG 之间的差异较小(AUC:κFLC 0.77,QκFLC 0.86,κFLC 指数 0.77):事实上,研究中的 >50%的 OCB- MS 患者表现出与 CG 相同的 κFLC、QκFLC 和 κFLC 指数值。相反,如果目的是选择 MS 患者,同时避免进行更复杂的等电聚焦测试,则可以使用具有 MS 绝对特异性的数值(QκFLC=15,灵敏度=0.76 和 κFLC 指数=3.09,灵敏度=0.72)。本研究中的值需要通过更多患者的数据进行验证,包括那些患有其他 CSF 炎症性疾病的患者。无论如何,最重要的发现是,对于一些 OCB- 患者,κFLC 在诊断 MS 方面比 OCB 更有效。