Dall Bruce E, Eden Sonia V, Cho Woojin, Karkenny Alexa, Brooks Daina M, Hayward Gerald M, Moldavsky Mark, Yandamuri Soumya, Bucklen Brandon S
Borgess Brain and Spine Institute, 1521 Gull Road, Kalamazoo, MI 49048, USA.
Borgess Brain and Spine Institute, 1521 Gull Road, Kalamazoo, MI 49048, USA; Western Michigan University University Homer Stryker md School of Medicine, 300 Portage Street, Kalamazoo, MI 49007.
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2019 Aug;68:182-189. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.05.025. Epub 2019 May 25.
Sacroiliac joint hypermobility or aberrant mechanics may be a source of pain. The purpose of this study was to assess sacroiliac joint range of motion after simulated adjacent lumbosacral instrumented fusion, with or without sacroiliac joint fusion, with lateral sacroiliac screws.
In this in vitro biomechanical study, seven cadaveric specimens were tested on a six-degrees-of-freedom machine under load control. Left posterior sacroiliac joint ligaments were severed to maximize joint range of motion. Influence of lumbosacral instrumentation on sacroiliac joint motion, with or without fixation, was studied.
During flexion-extension in the setting of posterior sacroiliac joint injury and L5-S1 fixation, sacroiliac joint range of motion increased to 195% of intact. After fixation with lateral sacroiliac screws, average range of motion reduced to 144% of intact motion. Sacroiliac joint screws thus partially stabilized the joint and reduced motion. Use of 6 bilateral sacroiliac joint screws with L5-S1 screw and rod fixation in lateral bending and axial rotation yielded the greatest reduction in range of motion. Without lumbosacral fixation, baseline motion of the sacroiliac joint was reduced, and sacroiliac joint screw alone, using either 2, 3, or 6 screws, was able to restore motion at or below the level of an intact joint.
Sacroiliac joint ligament injury with existing lumbosacral fixation doubled sacroiliac joint range of motion, but thereafter, fixation with lateral sacroiliac screws decreased range of motion of the injured sacroiliac joint. Screw configuration played a minor role, but generally, 6 sacroiliac joint screws had the greatest motion reduction.
骶髂关节活动过度或力学异常可能是疼痛的一个来源。本研究的目的是评估在模拟相邻腰骶部器械融合术(无论有无骶髂关节融合)并使用骶髂关节外侧螺钉的情况下,骶髂关节的活动范围。
在这项体外生物力学研究中,对7个尸体标本在负载控制下的六自由度机器上进行测试。切断左侧骶髂关节后韧带以最大化关节活动范围。研究了腰骶部器械固定对骶髂关节活动的影响,无论有无固定。
在骶髂关节后部损伤和L5-S1固定的情况下,屈伸过程中骶髂关节活动范围增加至完整状态的195%。使用骶髂关节外侧螺钉固定后,平均活动范围降至完整活动的144%。因此,骶髂关节螺钉部分稳定了关节并减少了活动。在侧弯和轴向旋转中,使用6枚双侧骶髂关节螺钉与L5-S1螺钉和棒固定,活动范围减少最大。在没有腰骶部固定的情况下,骶髂关节的基线活动减少,单独使用2枚、3枚或6枚螺钉的骶髂关节螺钉能够将活动恢复到完整关节水平或以下。
在已有腰骶部固定的情况下,骶髂关节韧带损伤使骶髂关节活动范围增加了一倍,但此后,使用骶髂关节外侧螺钉固定会减少受伤骶髂关节的活动范围。螺钉配置起的作用较小,但一般来说,6枚骶髂关节螺钉减少的活动最大。