Suppr超能文献

骶髂关节融合:对侧融合的发生率、时机及危险因素。

Sacroiliac joint fusion: incidence, timing, and risk factors for contralateral fusion.

作者信息

Waters Jefferson, Khoylyan Ara, Maniscalco Kaitlyn, Adams William, Pheasant Michael, Tang Alex, Chen Tan

机构信息

Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Scranton, PA, United States.

Geisinger Northeast Orthopaedic Surgery Residency, Wilkes-Barre/Scranton, PA, United States.

出版信息

N Am Spine Soc J. 2025 Apr 30;22:100614. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2025.100614. eCollection 2025 Jun.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction is implicated in 15% to 25% of cases of chronic lower back pain, a leading cause of disability globally. Sacroiliac joint fusion (SIJF) has become an increasingly utilized treatment for refractory SIJ pain, with its adoption projected to rise significantly. While SIJF can alleviate symptoms, many patients develop contralateral SIJ pathology requiring subsequent surgery. Understanding the incidence, timing, and risk factors for bilateral SIJF is critical for improving patient outcomes, managing expectation, and guiding surgical decision-making.This study aimed to (1) determine the incidence of bilateral SIJF, (2) assess the timing between initial ipsilateral and subsequent contralateral SIJF, (3) identify risk factors associated with progression to contralateral SIJF, and (4) compare the timing to contralateral SIJF between patients presenting with unilateral versus bilateral SIJ dysfunction.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted identifying 323 consecutive SIJFs performed between 2011 and 2024 at an integrated healthcare system. Three clinical cohorts were identified based on progression to SIJF. Cohort 1 included patients who underwent unilateral SIJF only. Cohort 2 patients developed contralateral SIJ pain following initial SIJF, while Cohort 3 patients had bilateral SIJ pain prior to initial SIJF. Demographics and prior spine surgical details were collected and included in multivariate analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to evaluate the timing between SIJFs. Comparisons between groups were established with student's -test and chi-square analysis. Statistical significance was defined as p < .05.

RESULTS

A total of 57 (21%) patients underwent bilateral SIJF. Prior L5-S1 fusion was associated with a higher likelihood of bilateral surgery (OR = 2.55, p = .042), while prior lumbar fusion not involving L5-S1 was protective (OR = 0.20, p = .036). Over 90% of contralateral SIJF cases occurred within 18 months of the initial ipsilateral SIJF procedure. Patients in Cohort 3 progressed more rapidly to contralateral surgery than those in Cohort 2 (6.2 months vs. 12.7 months, p = .004). Average body mass index (BMI) was higher in Cohort 3 patients (31.9 kg/m vs. 28.2 kg/m, p = .038). Cohort 3 also showed a significantly higher incidence of prior single-level L5-S1 fusion (50% vs. 13%, p = .008). Age, sex, and multilevel lumbar fusions were not significantly associated with bilateral SIJF.

CONCLUSIONS

Contralateral SIJF occurs in 21% of patients who have undergone initial unilateral SIJF, with over 90% of cases occurring within 18 months of the initial ipsilateral fusion procedure. Bilateral SIJ pain prior to initial SIJF and prior L5-S1 fusion are key predictors of contralateral surgery. Patients with bilateral SIJ pain had elevated BMI. These findings highlight the importance of early identification of high-risk patients to inform treatment decisions and potentially improve outcomes.

摘要

背景

骶髂关节(SIJ)功能障碍在全球慢性下腰痛病例中占15%至25%,慢性下腰痛是导致残疾的主要原因。骶髂关节融合术(SIJF)已成为治疗难治性骶髂关节疼痛越来越常用的方法,预计其应用将显著增加。虽然骶髂关节融合术可以缓解症状,但许多患者会出现对侧骶髂关节病变,需要后续手术。了解双侧骶髂关节融合术的发生率、时间以及危险因素对于改善患者预后、管理预期和指导手术决策至关重要。本研究旨在:(1)确定双侧骶髂关节融合术的发生率;(2)评估初次同侧与后续对侧骶髂关节融合术之间的时间间隔;(3)确定与进展为对侧骶髂关节融合术相关的危险因素;(4)比较单侧与双侧骶髂关节功能障碍患者进展为对侧骶髂关节融合术的时间。

方法

对2011年至2024年在一个综合医疗系统中连续进行的323例骶髂关节融合术进行回顾性研究。根据骶髂关节融合术的进展情况确定了三个临床队列。队列1包括仅接受单侧骶髂关节融合术的患者。队列2的患者在初次骶髂关节融合术后出现对侧骶髂关节疼痛,而队列3的患者在初次骶髂关节融合术前有双侧骶髂关节疼痛。收集人口统计学和既往脊柱手术细节并纳入多变量分析。采用Kaplan-Meier生存曲线评估骶髂关节融合术之间的时间间隔。通过学生t检验和卡方分析进行组间比较。统计学显著性定义为p < 0.05。

结果

共有57例(21%)患者接受了双侧骶髂关节融合术。既往L5-S1融合术与双侧手术的可能性较高相关(OR = 2.55,p = 0.042),而既往不涉及L5-S1的腰椎融合术具有保护作用(OR = 0.20,p = 0.036)。超过90%的对侧骶髂关节融合术病例发生在初次同侧骶髂关节融合术的18个月内。队列3的患者比对列2的患者进展为对侧手术的速度更快(6.2个月对12.7个月,p = 0.004)。队列3患者的平均体重指数(BMI)更高(31.9kg/m²对28.2kg/m²,p = 0.038)。队列3既往单节段L5-S1融合术的发生率也显著更高(50%对13%,p = 0.008)。年龄、性别和多节段腰椎融合术与双侧骶髂关节融合术无显著相关性。

结论

在接受初次单侧骶髂关节融合术的患者中。21%发生了对侧骶髂关节融合术超过90%的病例发生在初次同侧融合术的18个月内。初次骶髂关节融合术前的双侧骶髂关节疼痛和既往L5-S1融合术是对侧手术的关键预测因素。有双侧骶髂关节疼痛的患者BMI升高。这些发现凸显了早期识别高危患者以指导治疗决策并可能改善预后的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6eef/12167112/b08630e4089a/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Sacroiliac joint fusion: incidence, timing, and risk factors for contralateral fusion.
N Am Spine Soc J. 2025 Apr 30;22:100614. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2025.100614. eCollection 2025 Jun.
6
Effects of BMI on SI joint fusion outcomes: examining the evidence to improve insurance guidelines.
Spine J. 2024 May;24(5):783-790. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.11.015. Epub 2023 Dec 9.
8
Cost-Utility Analysis of Sacroiliac Joint Fusion in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Multi-Level Lumbar Fusion to the Sacrum.
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2022 Aug 8;14:523-535. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S377132. eCollection 2022.
10
The Assessment of Fusion Following Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Surgery.
Cureus. 2017 Oct 20;9(10):e1787. doi: 10.7759/cureus.1787.

本文引用的文献

2
Nationwide Analysis of Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Trends: Regional Variations in Utilization and Population Characteristics.
Global Spine J. 2025 Mar;15(2):518-525. doi: 10.1177/21925682231196448. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
4
Projections and Epidemiology of Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in Medicare Patients to 2040-2060.
JB JS Open Access. 2023 Feb 28;8(1). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.22.00112. eCollection 2023 Jan-Mar.
6
Cost-Utility Analysis of Sacroiliac Joint Fusion in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Multi-Level Lumbar Fusion to the Sacrum.
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2022 Aug 8;14:523-535. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S377132. eCollection 2022.
7
Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction: Diagnosis and Treatment.
Am Fam Physician. 2022 Mar 1;105(3):239-245.
8
Surgical risk factors associated with the development of adjacent segment pathology in the lumbar spine.
EFORT Open Rev. 2021 Oct 19;6(10):966-972. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210050. eCollection 2021 Oct.
9
Use of Diagnostic Injections to Evaluate Sacroiliac Joint Pain.
Int J Spine Surg. 2020 Feb 10;14(Suppl 1):30-34. doi: 10.14444/6081. eCollection 2020 Feb.
10
Biomechanics of the Sacroiliac Joint: Anatomy, Function, Biomechanics, Sexual Dimorphism, and Causes of Pain.
Int J Spine Surg. 2020 Feb 10;14(Suppl 1):3-13. doi: 10.14444/6077. eCollection 2020 Feb.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验