Department of Sociology, New York University, New York, NY 10012
Department of Sociology, New York University, New York, NY 10012.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Jul 9;116(28):13909-13914. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1814688116. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
Recent research suggests that intergenerational income mobility has remained low and stable in America, but popular discourse routinely assumes that Americans are optimistic about mobility prospects in society. Examining these 2 seemingly contradictory observations requires a careful measurement of the public's perceptions of mobility. Unlike most previous work that measures perceptions about mobility outcomes for the overall population or certain subgroups, we propose a survey instrument that emphasizes the variation in perceived mobility prospects for hypothetical children across parent income ranks. Based on this survey instrument, we derive the perceived relationship between the income ranks of parents and children, which can then be compared against the actual rank-rank relationship reported by empirical work based on tax data. We fielded this instrument in a general population survey experiment ( = 3,077). Our results suggest that Americans overestimate the intergenerational persistence in income ranks. They overestimate economic prospects for children from rich families and underestimate economic prospects for those from poor families.
最近的研究表明,美国代际收入流动性一直保持在较低且稳定的水平,但大众话语通常假定美国人对社会的流动性前景持乐观态度。要检验这两个看似矛盾的观察结果,需要仔细衡量公众对流动性的看法。与大多数之前衡量整个人口或某些特定群体对流动性结果的看法的工作不同,我们提出了一种调查工具,强调了对不同收入阶层的假设孩子的感知流动性前景的变化。基于这个调查工具,我们得出了父母和孩子的收入阶层之间的感知关系,然后可以将其与基于税收数据的实证工作报告的实际阶层-阶层关系进行比较。我们在一项总体人口调查实验中(n=3077)使用了这种工具。我们的结果表明,美国人高估了收入阶层的代际持续性。他们高估了富裕家庭孩子的经济前景,而低估了贫困家庭孩子的经济前景。