Suppr超能文献

美国人对社会流动性的看法因意识形态的不同而存在分歧(且被扭曲)。

Perceptions of U.S. social mobility are divided (and distorted) along ideological lines.

作者信息

Chambers John R, Swan Lawton K, Heesacker Martin

机构信息

Saint Louis University

University of Florida.

出版信息

Psychol Sci. 2015 Apr;26(4):413-23. doi: 10.1177/0956797614566657. Epub 2015 Feb 13.

Abstract

The ability to move upward in social class or economic position (i.e., social mobility) is a defining feature of the American Dream, yet recent public-opinion polls indicate that many Americans are losing confidence in the essential fairness of the system and their opportunities for financial advancement. In two studies, we examined Americans' perceptions of both current levels of mobility in the United States and temporal trends in mobility, and we compared these perceptions with objective indicators to determine perceptual accuracy. Overall, participants underestimated current mobility and erroneously concluded that mobility has declined over the past four decades. These misperceptions were more pronounced among politically liberal participants than among politically moderate or conservative ones. These perception differences were accounted for by liberals' relative dissatisfaction with the current social system, social hierarchies, and economic inequality. These findings have important implications for theories of political ideology.

摘要

在社会阶层或经济地位上向上流动的能力(即社会流动)是美国梦的一个决定性特征,然而最近的民意调查显示,许多美国人对该体系的基本公平性以及他们实现经济进步的机会正逐渐失去信心。在两项研究中,我们考察了美国人对美国当前流动水平以及流动随时间变化趋势的看法,并将这些看法与客观指标进行比较,以确定认知的准确性。总体而言,参与者低估了当前的流动性,并错误地得出结论,认为流动性在过去四十年中有所下降。这些错误认知在政治上持自由主义观点的参与者中比在政治上持温和或保守观点的参与者中更为明显。这些认知差异是由自由主义者对当前社会体系、社会等级制度和经济不平等相对不满所致。这些发现对政治意识形态理论具有重要意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验