Department of Economic History & Centre for Economic Demography, Lund University, Scheelevägen 15B, 223 63, Lund, Sweden.
Demography. 2018 Aug;55(4):1547-1565. doi: 10.1007/s13524-018-0693-4.
Intergenerational mobility has remained stable over recent decades in the United States but varies sharply across the country. In this article, I document that areas with more prevalent slavery by the outbreak of the Civil War exhibit substantially less upward mobility today. I find a negative link between prior slavery and contemporary mobility within states, when controlling for a wide range of historical and contemporary factors including income and inequality, focusing on the historical slave states, using a variety of mobility measures, and when exploiting geographical differences in the suitability for cultivating cotton as an instrument for the prevalence of slavery. As a first step to disentangle the underlying channels of persistence, I examine whether any of the five broad factors highlighted by Chetty et al. (2014a) as the most important correlates of upward mobility-family structure, income inequality, school quality, segregation, and social capital-can account for the link between earlier slavery and current mobility. More fragile family structures in areas where slavery was more prevalent, as reflected in lower marriage rates and a larger share of children living in single-parent households, is seemingly the most relevant to understand why it still shapes the geography of opportunity in the United States.
近几十年来,美国代际流动性一直保持稳定,但在全国范围内差异很大。本文记录了内战爆发前奴隶制更为普遍的地区,如今向上流动性显著降低。在控制了包括收入和不平等在内的广泛历史和当代因素后,我发现内战前奴隶制与当前各州内部的流动性之间存在负相关关系,重点关注历史上的奴隶州,使用各种流动性衡量标准,并利用棉花种植适宜性的地理差异作为奴隶制流行的工具。作为厘清持久性背后潜在渠道的第一步,我考察了切蒂等人(2014a)强调的五个影响向上流动的最重要因素——家庭结构、收入不平等、学校质量、隔离和社会资本——是否可以解释早期奴隶制与当前流动性之间的联系。在奴隶制更为普遍的地区,家庭结构更为脆弱,这反映在较低的结婚率和更多的单亲家庭,这似乎是理解为什么奴隶制仍然塑造着美国机会的地理分布的关键因素。