Wang Jun-Jie, Gao Xin-Yi, Li Hong-Zhuo, Du Shan-Shuang
Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi 046000, Shanxi Province, China.
Shaanxi Ophthalmic Medical Center, Xi'an No.4 Hospital, Affiliated Guangren Hospital, School of Medicine, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710004, Shaanxi Province, China.
Int J Ophthalmol. 2019 Jun 18;12(6):1027-1036. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2019.06.24. eCollection 2019.
To evaluate the relative efficacy and safety of besifloxacin for treatment of acute bacterial conjunctivitis.
A comprehensive search in PubMed, EMBASE Web of Science, Cochrane Central Database and CNKI was undertaken for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing besifloxacin with other treatments or placebo. The primary outcome measures were clinical resolution, rates of bacterial eradication, individual clinical outcomes, cure rates, and bacterial eradication rates of different kinds of pathogens. Safety outcomes were the number of adverse effects (AEs). The final search was performed on August 2018.
Eight RCTs were included. Five studies compared the efficacy and safety of besifloxacin with placebo, 2 studies compared besifloxacin with moxifloxacin, and 1 study compared besifloxacin with gatifloxacin. A total of 3105 patients met the inclusion criteria. Besifloxacin presented higher efficacy and safety than did placebo in clinical resolution, rates of bacterial eradication, individual clinical outcomes, cure rates, bacterial eradication rates of different kinds of pathogens and the number of AEs. There was no significant difference between besifloxacin and moxifloxacin or gatifloxacin in the comparison items mentioned above.
Besifloxacin is highly effective and safe for treatment of acute bacterial conjunctivitis. Further comparative trials regarding the effect of besifloxacin for treatment of acute bacterial conjunctivitis will aid in treatment decisions.
评估贝西沙星治疗急性细菌性结膜炎的相对疗效和安全性。
全面检索PubMed、EMBASE、科学网、Cochrane中心数据库和中国知网,查找比较贝西沙星与其他治疗方法或安慰剂的随机对照试验(RCT)。主要结局指标为临床缓解情况、细菌清除率、个体临床结局、治愈率以及不同病原体的细菌清除率。安全性结局为不良反应(AE)的数量。最终检索于2018年8月进行。
纳入8项RCT。5项研究比较了贝西沙星与安慰剂的疗效和安全性,2项研究比较了贝西沙星与莫西沙星,1项研究比较了贝西沙星与加替沙星。共有3105例患者符合纳入标准。在临床缓解情况、细菌清除率、个体临床结局、治愈率、不同病原体的细菌清除率以及AE数量方面,贝西沙星的疗效和安全性均高于安慰剂。在上述比较项目中,贝西沙星与莫西沙星或加替沙星之间无显著差异。
贝西沙星治疗急性细菌性结膜炎高效且安全。关于贝西沙星治疗急性细菌性结膜炎效果的进一步比较试验将有助于治疗决策。