School of Biomedical Engineering, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Department of Rehabilitation Science and Technology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Biomed Res Int. 2019 May 20;2019:9252368. doi: 10.1155/2019/9252368. eCollection 2019.
A variety of prescribed accommodation periods have been used in published prosthesis intervention studies that have examined biomechanical outcomes. Few investigators included repeated measurements in their study design, leaving questions as to how measured outcomes change as amputees acclimate to a new prosthesis. This paper is the product of our investigation as to whether measured gait variables were affected by the duration of accommodation period, and to assess the relationship between measured outcomes and the subjective perception of the participants. A sample of transtibial amputees were recruited for this study. Gait data was collected by wearable sensor repeatedly, starting immediately after fitting the interventional foot and extending over a subsequent four days. Participants indicated their perceived accommodation quality on a visual analog scale (VAS). A total of twelve commonly used spatiotemporal gait parameters were analyzed. Friedman tests were used to determine overall differences across time points in both early (one hour) and late (day two through five) accommodation phases, for each gait variable. Statistically significant changes across the early phase were found for variables gait speed (2)=8.000, =0.018, cadence (2)=7.185, =0.028, and double support time on the sound side (2)=8.615, =0.013. Across days two through five, no gait variable significantly changed. VAS scores correlated strongly with step count (r=1.000, <0.001) and cadence (r=0.857, =0.014). Longer accommodation periods resulted in less deviations of gait variables for the clinical assessment in the process of prosthetic rehabilitation. Trying out prosthetic interventions for less than one hour has yielded unreliable outcomes.
在研究生物力学结果的已发表假肢干预研究中,使用了各种规定的适应期。很少有研究人员在他们的研究设计中包含重复测量,这使得人们对随着截肢者适应新假肢,测量结果如何变化存在疑问。本文是我们研究的产物,旨在探讨测量的步态变量是否受适应期持续时间的影响,并评估测量结果与参与者主观感知之间的关系。 为此项研究招募了一批小腿截肢者。使用可穿戴传感器反复收集步态数据,从假肢装配后立即开始,并在随后的四天内进行。参与者使用视觉模拟量表 (VAS) 对他们的适应质量进行了评估。总共分析了十二个常用的时空步态参数。对于每个步态变量,弗里德曼检验用于确定早期(一小时)和晚期(第 2 天至第 5 天)适应期各个时间点的总体差异。在早期阶段,变量步速(2)=8.000,=0.018,步频(2)=7.185,=0.028,和健全侧的双支撑时间(2)=8.615,=0.013 出现了统计学上显著的变化。在第 2 天至第 5 天期间,没有步态变量发生显著变化。VAS 评分与步频(r=1.000,<0.001)和步频(r=0.857,=0.014)呈强相关。适应期较长可使假肢康复过程中的临床评估中步态变量的偏差更小。尝试假肢干预不到一个小时会产生不可靠的结果。