Suppr超能文献

糖尿病足手术清创术:运用交通信号灯原则改善培训与实践

Surgical Diabetic Foot Debridement: Improving Training and Practice Utilizing the Traffic Light Principle.

作者信息

Ahluwalia Raju, Vainieri Erika, Tam Joseph, Sait Saif, Sinha Aaditya, Manu Chris Adusei, Reichert Ines, Kavarthapu Venu, Edmonds Michael, Vas Prashant

机构信息

King's College Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2019 Sep;18(3):279-286. doi: 10.1177/1534734619853657. Epub 2019 Jun 25.

Abstract

Comprehensive management of a severe diabetic foot infection focus on clear treatment pathways. Including rapid, radical debridement of all infection in addition to intravenous antibiotics and supportive measures. However, inexperienced surgeons can often underestimate the extent of infection, risking inadequate debridement, repeated theatre episodes, higher hospital morbidity, and hospital length of stay (LOS). This study aims to assess protocolized diabetic-foot-debridement: Red-Amber-Green (RAG) model as part of a value-based driven intervention. The model highlights necrotic/infected tissue (red-zone, nonviable), followed by areas of moderate damage (amber-zone), healthy tissue (green-zone, viable). Sequential training of orthopedic surgeons supporting our emergency service was undertaken prior to introduction. We compared outcomes before/after RAG introduction (pre-RAG, n = 48; post- RAG, n = 35). Outcomes measured included: impact on number of debridement/individual admission, percentage of individuals requiring multiple debridement, and length-of-hospital-stay as a function-of-cost. All-patients fulfilled grade 2/3, stage-B, of the Texas-Wound-Classification. Those with evidence of ischemia were excluded. The pre-RAG-group were younger (53.8 ± 11.0 years vs 60.3 ± 9.2 years, = .01); otherwise the 2-groups were matched: HbA1c, white blood cell count, and C-reactive protein. The post-RAG-group underwent significantly lower numbers of debridement's (1.1 ± 0.3 vs 1.5 ± 0.6/individual admission, = .003); equired fewer visits to theatre (8.6% vs 38%, = .003), their LOS was reduced (median LOS pre-RAG 36.0 vs post-RAG 21.5 days, = .02). RAG facilitates infection clearance, fewer theatre-episodes, and shorter LOS. This protocolized-management-tools in acute severely infected diabetic foot infection offers benefits to patients and health-care-gain.

摘要

重度糖尿病足感染的综合管理侧重于明确的治疗路径。包括对所有感染进行快速、彻底的清创,同时使用静脉抗生素和支持措施。然而,经验不足的外科医生常常会低估感染的程度,存在清创不充分、多次手术、医院发病率较高以及住院时间延长的风险。本研究旨在评估作为基于价值驱动干预措施一部分的标准化糖尿病足清创:红-黄-绿(RAG)模型。该模型突出坏死/感染组织(红色区域,无活力),其次是中度损伤区域(黄色区域)、健康组织(绿色区域,有活力)。在引入该模型之前,对支持我们急诊服务的骨科医生进行了系列培训。我们比较了引入RAG之前/之后的结果(RAG之前,n = 48;RAG之后,n = 35)。测量的结果包括:对每次住院清创次数的影响、需要多次清创的患者百分比以及作为成本函数的住院时间。所有患者均符合德州伤口分类的2/3级、B期。有缺血证据的患者被排除。RAG之前的组更年轻(53.8±11.0岁对60.3±9.2岁,P = 0.01);除此之外,两组在糖化血红蛋白、白细胞计数和C反应蛋白方面相匹配。RAG之后的组清创次数显著减少(每次住院1.1±0.3次对1.5±0.6次,P = 0.003);需要去手术室的次数更少(8.6%对38%,P = 0.003),住院时间缩短(RAG之前的中位住院时间为36.0天,RAG之后为21.5天,P = 0.02)。RAG有助于感染清除、减少手术次数并缩短住院时间。这种用于急性重度感染糖尿病足感染的标准化管理工具对患者有益并有利于医疗保健。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验