Gloucestershire Royal Hospital, Gloucester, UK.
School of Nursing, Institute of Clinical Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK.
J Clin Nurs. 2019 Dec;28(23-24):4155-4165. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14984. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
If studies are to be valid, recruitment of representative samples is essential. In 2012, 28% of UK emergency departments met the 80% standard for recruitment to trials set by the National Institute for Health Research. Research nurses play a vital role in the conduct of high-quality research, and it has been argued that dedicated research nurses are needed if clinical trials are to recruit successfully to target.
What are research nurses' experiences of obtaining consent from or for patients participating in emergency care research? A qualitative evidence review.
A qualitative integrative literature review with a narrative synthesis of the evidence. PRISMA guidelines for reporting systematic qualitative reviews (Appendix S1) were followed. A search of five electronic databases was performed in December 2018 along with a hand search which yielded 125 citations: 10 papers and one PhD thesis met the review eligibility criteria. Methodological quality of the selected studies was evaluated, and data were extracted and synthesised.
Three themes were identified: Access, Organisation and Timing. Research nurses encountered both general and specific barriers when seeking to obtain consent for participation in research. In particular, it was found there was lack of experience among staff of working in emergency research and with securing deferred consent. The distinction between nurse researchers with a clinical role and those dedicated to solely to research only is often not clear and warrants further investigation.
Nurse researchers with and without a clinical role can make a positive difference in recruitment to trials in emergency care. The involvement of dedicated research nurses in the consent process can increase recruitment to emergency care research. Experience of recruiting to clinical trials in nonemergency settings does not seem to help when recruiting for trials in emergency care.
There is a need for greater understanding of the experiences of dedicated research nurses in emergency care settings and in particular with regard to deferred consent.
如果研究要具有有效性,那么招募有代表性的样本是至关重要的。2012 年,英国 28%的急症科达到了国家卫生研究院(National Institute for Health Research)设定的试验招募 80%标准。研究护士在高质量研究的开展中起着至关重要的作用,有人认为,如果临床试验要成功招募到目标人群,就需要专门的研究护士。
参与急症护理研究的患者或其代表同意参与研究的过程中,研究护士的经历是什么?一项定性证据综述。
采用定性综合文献综述,对证据进行叙述性综合。按照系统定性综述的 PRISMA 指南(附录 S1)进行报告。2018 年 12 月对五个电子数据库进行了搜索,并进行了手工搜索,共获得 125 条引文:10 篇论文和一篇博士论文符合综述的入选标准。对入选研究的方法学质量进行了评估,并提取和综合了数据。
确定了三个主题:获取途径、组织和时间安排。研究护士在寻求同意参与研究时遇到了一般的和特定的障碍。特别是,研究发现工作人员缺乏在急症研究方面的经验,并且在争取延期同意方面也存在困难。具有临床角色和专门从事研究的护士研究者之间的区别往往不明确,值得进一步调查。
具有和不具有临床角色的护士研究者都可以在临床试验的急症护理招募中发挥积极作用。在同意过程中专门的研究护士的参与可以增加急症护理研究的招募。在非急症环境中招募临床试验的经验似乎并不能帮助在急症护理中招募试验。
需要更好地了解急症护理环境中专门研究护士的经验,特别是在延期同意方面。