Suppr超能文献

任务复杂性是否会对男性和女性的神经血管耦合反应产生相似的影响?

Does task complexity impact the neurovascular coupling response similarly between males and females?

机构信息

Cerebrovascular Concussion Lab, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Sport Injury Prevention Research Centre, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Physiol Rep. 2021 Sep;9(17):e15020. doi: 10.14814/phy2.15020.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

While previous studies have demonstrated a complex visual scene search elicits a robust neurovascular coupling (NVC) response, it is unknown how the duration of visual stimuli presentation influences NVC metrics. This study examined how stimuli duration, in addition to biological sex and self-reported engagement impact NVC responses.

METHODS

Participants (n = 20, female = 10) completed four visual paradigms. Three involved simple visual shapes presented at 0.5-, 2-, and 4-s intervals in randomized orders. The fourth paradigm was a complex visual scene search ("Where's Waldo?"). Participants completed eight cycles of 20-s eyes-closed followed by 40-s eyes-open. Transcranial Doppler ultrasound indexed posterior and middle cerebral artery velocities (PCA and MCA). Participants self-reported their engagement following each task (1 [minimal] to 10 [maximal]).

RESULTS

The "Where's Waldo?" task evoked greater PCA percent increase (all p < 0.001) and area under the curve during the first 30-s of the task (all p < 0.001) compared to simple shapes. Females displayed greater absolute baseline and peak PCA and MCA velocities across all tasks (all p < 0.002). Subjective engagement displayed moderate correlation levels with PCA percent increase (Spearman ρ = 0.58) and area under the curve (Spearman ρ = 0.60) metrics in males, whereas these were weak for females (Spearman ρ = 0.43 and ρ = 0.38, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The complex visual paradigm "Where's Waldo?" greatly augmented the signal-to-noise ratio within the PCA aspects of the NVC response compared to simple shapes. While both sexes had similar NVC responses, task engagement was more related to NVC metrics in males compared to females. Therefore, future NVC investigations should consider task engagement when designing studies.

摘要

背景

虽然先前的研究已经证明复杂的视觉场景搜索会引发强烈的神经血管耦合(NVC)反应,但目前尚不清楚视觉刺激呈现的持续时间如何影响 NVC 指标。本研究检查了刺激持续时间,以及生物性别和自我报告的参与度如何影响 NVC 反应。

方法

参与者(n=20,女性=10)完成了四个视觉范式。其中三个涉及以随机顺序呈现的 0.5、2 和 4 秒间隔的简单视觉形状。第四个范式是复杂的视觉场景搜索(“Where's Waldo?”)。参与者完成了 8 个 20 秒闭眼和 40 秒睁眼周期。经颅多普勒超声索引大脑后动脉和大脑中动脉速度(PCA 和 MCA)。参与者在完成每个任务后自我报告参与度(1[最小]至 10[最大])。

结果

与简单形状相比,“Where's Waldo?”任务在任务的前 30 秒内引起更大的 PCA 百分比增加(均 p<0.001)和曲线下面积(均 p<0.001)。女性在所有任务中都显示出更大的绝对基线和峰值 PCA 和 MCA 速度(均 p<0.002)。在男性中,主观参与度与 PCA 百分比增加(Spearman ρ=0.58)和曲线下面积(Spearman ρ=0.60)指标呈中度相关水平,而女性的相关性较弱(Spearman ρ=0.43 和 ρ=0.38)。

结论

与简单形状相比,复杂的视觉范式“Where's Waldo?”极大地提高了 PCA 方面的 NVC 反应的信号噪声比。虽然男女的 NVC 反应相似,但与女性相比,男性的任务参与度与 NVC 指标的相关性更高。因此,未来的 NVC 研究在设计研究时应考虑任务参与度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d820/8436054/b4efd5e8e8f5/PHY2-9-e15020-g006.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验