Department of Physics and Astronomy "Ettore Majorana", University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
INFN Sezione di Catania, Catania, Italy.
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 26;14(6):e0218793. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218793. eCollection 2019.
Although interdisciplinarity is often touted as a necessity for modern research, the evidence on the relative impact of sectorial versus to interdisciplinary science is qualitative at best. In this paper we leverage the bibliographic data set of the American Physical Society to quantify the role of interdisciplinarity in physics, and that of talent and luck in achieving success in scientific careers. We analyze a period of 30 years (1980-2009) tagging papers and their authors by means of the Physics and Astronomy Classification Scheme (PACS), to show that some degree of interdisciplinarity is quite helpful to reach success, measured as a proxy of either the number of articles or the citations score. We also propose an agent-based model of the publication-reputation-citation dynamics which reproduces the trends observed in the APS data set. On the one hand, the results highlight the crucial role of randomness and serendipity in real scientific research; on the other, they shed light on a counterintuitive effect indicating that the most talented authors are not necessarily the most successful ones.
虽然跨学科通常被吹捧为现代研究的必要条件,但关于部门科学与跨学科科学相对影响的证据充其量是定性的。在本文中,我们利用美国物理学会的书目数据集来量化跨学科在物理学中的作用,以及人才和运气在科学职业成功中的作用。我们通过物理和天文学分类方案(PACS)分析了 30 年(1980-2009 年)的时间段,以展示一定程度的跨学科性对于取得成功非常有帮助,这可以通过文章数量或引用得分来衡量。我们还提出了一个基于代理的出版-声誉-引用动态模型,该模型再现了在 APS 数据集观察到的趋势。一方面,结果强调了随机性和偶然机会在实际科学研究中的关键作用;另一方面,它们揭示了一种反直觉的效应,表明最有才华的作者不一定是最成功的作者。