• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

MELD 作为移植优先级可靠工具的批判性评价。

A Critical Review of MELD as a Reliable Tool for Transplant Prioritization.

机构信息

Liver Intensive Care Unit, Centre Hépatobiliaire, Paul Brousse Hospital, University of South Paris, Villejuif, Paris, France.

Centre Hépatobiliaire, Paul Brousse Hospital, Inserm-Paris Sud research Unit 1193, University Paris Sud, Villejuif, Paris, France.

出版信息

Semin Liver Dis. 2019 Nov;39(4):403-413. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1688750. Epub 2019 Jun 26.

DOI:10.1055/s-0039-1688750
PMID:31242526
Abstract

In a context of global organ shortage, the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score seems to be a fair prioritization tool, with a paradigm: "sickest first." Since its introduction in the United States in 2002, it has been rapidly adopted by transplant centers and organ sharing agencies around the world. The MELD score showed its effectiveness with a 12% reduction in waiting list mortality in the United States. Its success is linked to its simplicity, the use of basic variables (serum creatinine, serum bilirubin, and international normalized ratio [INR]), and its ability to predict short-term mortality, particularly on the transplant waiting list. However, this score is not perfect: its variables may have disadvantages for some patients, especially women, with serum creatinine and interlaboratory variability of the INR. The MELD score does not take into account some variables associated with poor short-term prognosis in cirrhotic patients. In addition, it is currently capped at 40, which results in the exclusion of sicker patients who could greatly benefit from transplantation. Finally, the MELD score does not accurately reflect the prognosis of several conditions, requiring a MELD exception system. Some solutions have been suggested such as MELD-Na or MELD uncapping, but it has not yet been fully accepted by all transplant centers.

摘要

在全球器官短缺的背景下,终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分似乎是一种公平的优先排序工具,其理念是“先救最危重的病人”。自 2002 年在美国推出以来,它已迅速被全球各地的移植中心和器官共享机构采用。MELD 评分显示了其有效性,使美国等待名单上的死亡率降低了 12%。它的成功与其简单性、使用基本变量(血清肌酐、血清胆红素和国际标准化比值[INR])以及预测短期死亡率的能力有关,尤其是在移植等待名单上。然而,这个评分并不完美:其变量可能对一些患者,特别是女性患者,存在不利影响,因为血清肌酐和 INR 的实验室间变异性较大。MELD 评分没有考虑到一些与肝硬化患者短期预后不良相关的变量。此外,它目前的最高分值为 40,这导致一些病情更严重的患者被排除在外,而这些患者可能会从移植中大大受益。最后,MELD 评分不能准确反映某些情况下的预后,需要建立 MELD 例外系统。已经提出了一些解决方案,如 MELD-Na 或 MELD 无上限,但尚未被所有移植中心完全接受。

相似文献

1
A Critical Review of MELD as a Reliable Tool for Transplant Prioritization.MELD 作为移植优先级可靠工具的批判性评价。
Semin Liver Dis. 2019 Nov;39(4):403-413. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1688750. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
2
The MELD score in patients awaiting liver transplant: strengths and weaknesses.等待肝移植患者的 MELD 评分:优势和劣势。
J Hepatol. 2011 Jun;54(6):1297-306. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2010.11.008. Epub 2010 Nov 20.
3
A method for establishing allocation equity among patients with and without hepatocellular carcinoma on a common liver transplant waiting list.一种在共同的肝移植等待名单上为肝癌患者和非肝癌患者分配公平性的方法。
J Hepatol. 2014 Feb;60(2):290-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.10.010. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
4
MELD 3.0: The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Updated for the Modern Era.MELD 3.0:适应新时代的终末期肝病模型。
Gastroenterology. 2021 Dec;161(6):1887-1895.e4. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.08.050. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
5
Region 11 MELD Na exception prospective study.11 区 MELD Na 例外前瞻性研究。
Ann Hepatol. 2012 Jan-Feb;11(1):62-7.
6
The impact of the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) on liver transplantation in one center in Brazil.终末期肝病模型(MELD)对巴西某一中心肝移植的影响。
Arq Gastroenterol. 2010 Jul-Sep;47(3):233-7. doi: 10.1590/s0004-28032010000300004.
7
Model for End stage Liver Disease (MELD) and Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) scores: Ability to predict mortality and removal from liver transplantation waiting list due to poor medical conditions.终末期肝病模型(MELD)和 Child-Turcotte-Pugh(CTP)评分:预测死亡率和因医疗状况不佳而从肝移植等待名单中移除的能力。
Arch Iran Med. 2014 Feb;17(2):118-21.
8
A model including sarcopenia surpasses the MELD score in predicting waiting list mortality in cirrhotic liver transplant candidates: A competing risk analysis in a national cohort.一个包含肌肉减少症的模型在预测肝硬化肝移植候选者等待名单死亡率方面优于 MELD 评分:一项全国队列的竞争风险分析。
J Hepatol. 2018 Apr;68(4):707-714. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.11.030. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
9
Does model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) require modification?终末期肝病模型(MELD)是否需要修改?
J Assoc Physicians India. 2011 Jun;59:372-3.
10
A revised model for end-stage liver disease optimizes prediction of mortality among patients awaiting liver transplantation.终末期肝病模型修订版优化了肝移植等待患者死亡率的预测。
Gastroenterology. 2011 Jun;140(7):1952-60. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.02.017. Epub 2011 Feb 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of gender-equity model for liver allocation (GEMA) and its sodium variant (GEMA-Na) in candidates for liver transplantation.肝移植候选者中肝脏分配性别平等模型(GEMA)及其钠变体(GEMA-Na)的验证。
Ann Gastroenterol. 2025 Jan-Feb;38(1):93-99. doi: 10.20524/aog.2024.0933. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
2
Non-Invasive Biomarkers and Breath Tests for Diagnosis and Monitoring of Chronic Liver Diseases.用于慢性肝病诊断和监测的非侵入性生物标志物及呼气试验
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Dec 30;15(1):68. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15010068.
3
Association between serum endocan levels and organ failure in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis.
肝硬化住院患者血清内脂素水平与器官衰竭之间的关联
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 26;19(12):e0315619. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315619. eCollection 2024.
4
Clinical characteristics and risk factor analysis of recipients with multidrug-resistant bacterial bloodstream infections after liver transplantation: a single-centre retrospective study.肝移植术后耐多药菌血流感染受者的临床特征及危险因素分析:一项单中心回顾性研究
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2024 Aug 20;17(1):2390072. doi: 10.1080/20523211.2024.2390072. eCollection 2024.
5
MELD-Na score may underestimate disease severity and risk of death in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD).MELD-Na 评分可能低估了代谢相关脂肪性肝病(MASLD)患者的疾病严重程度和死亡风险。
Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 13;13(1):22113. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-48819-6.
6
Evaluation of the Easy Albumin-Bilirubin Score as a Prognostic Tool for Mortality in Adult Trauma Patients in the Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Study.评估简易白蛋白-胆红素评分作为重症监护病房成年创伤患者死亡率的预后工具:一项回顾性研究。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Nov 15;13(22):3450. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13223450.
7
Evaluating the Effect of Artificial Liver Support on Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure Using the Quantitative Difference Algorithm: Retrospective Study.使用定量差异算法评估人工肝支持对慢加急性肝衰竭的疗效:回顾性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Oct 24;7:e45395. doi: 10.2196/45395.
8
Demystifying Prognosis : Understanding the Science and Art of Prognostication.揭开预后的神秘面纱:理解预后预测的科学与艺术。
Cancer Treat Res. 2023;187:53-71. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-29923-0_5.
9
Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Correlates with Disease Relapse and Death of Patients with Merkel Cell Carcinoma.终末期肝病模型与默克尔细胞癌患者的疾病复发和死亡相关。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jun 15;15(12):3195. doi: 10.3390/cancers15123195.
10
National Liver Allocation Policy-Consensus Document by the Liver Transplantation Society of India for a Nationally Uniform System of Allocation of Deceased Donor Liver Grafts.印度肝脏移植协会关于全国统一的已故捐赠者肝脏移植分配系统的国家肝脏分配政策共识文件。
J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2023 Mar-Apr;13(2):303-318. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2022.12.001. Epub 2022 Dec 8.