• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

髋臼杯位置的单平面术中及双平面术后放射影像学测量是否相同?

Are single plane intraoperative and biplanar postoperative radiographic measurements of acetabular cup position the same?

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Hip Int. 2020 Sep;30(5):530-535. doi: 10.1177/1120700019859902. Epub 2019 Jun 27.

DOI:10.1177/1120700019859902
PMID:31242760
Abstract

PURPOSE

Supine positioning and the use of fluoroscopy during direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty (DAA THA) have been reported to improve acetabular component positioning. This study aims to compare 2-dimensional intraoperative radiographic RadLink measurements of acetabular component position with 3-dimensional postoperative 3D SterEOS measurements.

METHODS

Intraoperative fluoroscopy and RadLink (El Segundo, CA, USA) were used to measure acetabular cup position intraoperatively in 48 consecutive patients undergoing DAA THA. Cup position was measured on 6-week postoperative standing EOS images using 3D SterEOS software (EOS Imaging, SA, Paris, France) and compared to RadLink findings using Student's t-test. Safe-zone outliers were identified. We evaluated for measurement difference of > +/- 5°.

RESULTS

RadLink acetabular cup abduction measurement (mean 43.0°) was not significantly different than 3D SterEOS in the anatomic plane (mean 42.6°, = 0.50) or in the functional plane (mean 42.7°, = 0.61). RadLink acetabular cup anteversion measurement (mean 17.9°) was significantly different than 3D SterEOS in both the anatomic plane (mean 20.6°, = 0.022) and the functional plane (mean 21.2°, = 0.002). RadLink identified 2 cups outside of the safe-zone. However, SterEOS identified 12 (anatomic plane) and 10 (functional plane) outside of the safe-zone. In the functional plane, 58% of anteversion and 92% of abduction RadLink measurements were within +/- 5° of 3D SterEOS.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative fluoroscopic RadLink acetabular anteversion measurements are significantly different than 3D SterEOS measurements, while abduction measurements are similar. Significantly more acetabular cups were noted to be outside of the safe-zone when evaluated with 3D SterEOS versus RadLink.

摘要

目的

仰卧位和在直接前入路全髋关节置换术(DAA-THA)中使用透视术已被报道可改善髋臼部件的定位。本研究旨在比较二维术中放射学 RadLink 测量与三维术后 3D SterEOS 测量的髋臼部件位置。

方法

在 48 例连续接受 DAA-THA 的患者中,术中使用透视术和 RadLink(El Segundo,CA,美国)在术中测量髋臼杯的位置。在术后 6 周的站立 EOS 图像上使用 3D SterEOS 软件(EOS Imaging,SA,巴黎,法国)测量髋臼杯的位置,并使用学生 t 检验将测量结果与 RadLink 结果进行比较。确定安全区外的结果。我们评估了> +/- 5°的测量差异。

结果

RadLink 髋臼杯外展测量(平均 43.0°)在解剖平面上与 3D SterEOS(平均 42.6°, = 0.50)或功能平面上(平均 42.7°, = 0.61)无显著差异。RadLink 髋臼杯前倾角测量(平均 17.9°)在解剖平面(平均 20.6°, = 0.022)和功能平面(平均 21.2°, = 0.002)上均明显大于 3D SterEOS。RadLink 确定了 2 个杯在安全区外。然而,SterEOS 在解剖平面上确定了 12 个(解剖平面)和 10 个(功能平面)杯在安全区外。在功能平面上,58%的前倾角和 92%的外展角 RadLink 测量值与 3D SterEOS 的测量值相差 +/- 5°以内。

结论

术中透视 RadLink 髋臼前倾角测量值明显不同于 3D SterEOS 测量值,而外展角测量值相似。使用 3D SterEOS 评估时,与 RadLink 相比,明显有更多的髋臼杯被认为超出了安全区。

相似文献

1
Are single plane intraoperative and biplanar postoperative radiographic measurements of acetabular cup position the same?髋臼杯位置的单平面术中及双平面术后放射影像学测量是否相同?
Hip Int. 2020 Sep;30(5):530-535. doi: 10.1177/1120700019859902. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
2
Intraoperative evaluation of acetabular cup position during anterior approach total hip arthroplasty: are we accurately interpreting?前路全髋关节置换术中髋臼杯位置的术中评估:我们的解读准确吗?
Hip Int. 2020 Jan;30(1):40-47. doi: 10.1177/1120700019868665. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
3
Functional Acetabular Component Positioning During Direct Anterior Approach Hip Arthroplasty Using a Novel Three-Dimensional Virtual Mesh Imaging System With Fluoroscopy.在直接前入路髋关节置换术中使用新型三维虚拟网格成像系统和透视技术进行功能性髋臼部件定位。
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Sep;39(9S1):S88-S96. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.03.042. Epub 2024 Mar 24.
4
[Conventional cup navigation with 2D fluoroscopy in THA: accurate cup positioning respecting pelvic tilt].[全髋关节置换术中二维透视引导下传统髋臼杯置入:基于骨盆倾斜实现髋臼杯精准定位]
Z Orthop Unfall. 2011 Oct;149(5):510-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1270973. Epub 2011 Apr 8.
5
Does Intraoperative Fluoroscopy Improve Limb-Length Discrepancy and Acetabular Component Positioning During Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty?术中透视是否能改善直接前路全髋关节置换术中肢体长度差异和髋臼组件位置?
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Sep;33(9):2927-2931. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.05.004. Epub 2018 May 28.
6
Does fluoroscopy improve acetabular component placement in total hip arthroplasty?在全髋关节置换术中,透视检查能否改善髋臼假体的放置?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Dec;472(12):3953-62. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3944-8. Epub 2014 Sep 20.
7
Intraoperative fluoroscopy with a direct anterior approach reduces variation in acetabular cup abduction angle.采用直接前路入路的术中透视可减少髋臼杯外展角度的变化。
Hip Int. 2017 Nov 21;27(6):573-577. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000507. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
8
The Safe Zone Range for Cup Anteversion Is Narrower Than for Inclination in THA.全髋关节置换术中髋臼前倾角的安全区范围比倾斜角的安全区范围更窄。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Feb;476(2):325-335. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000051.
9
Supine versus lateral position for accurate positioning of acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty using the modified Watson-Jones approach: A randomized single-blind controlled trial.改良 Watson-Jones 入路全髋关节置换术中仰卧位与侧卧位对髋臼杯准确定位的比较:一项随机单盲对照试验。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019 Sep;105(5):915-922. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.05.004. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
10
Digital Radiography in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Technique and Radiographic Results.数字 X 射线摄影在全髋关节置换术中的应用:技术与影像学结果。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Feb 7;100(3):226-235. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01501.

引用本文的文献

1
Improved accuracy and fewer outliers with a novel CT-free robotic THA system in matched-pair analysis with manual THA.新型 CT 免扫机器人辅助全髋关节置换术系统在配对分析中与传统手动全髋关节置换术比较,准确性提高,离群值减少。
J Robot Surg. 2022 Aug;16(4):905-913. doi: 10.1007/s11701-021-01315-3. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
2
Lewinnek Safe Zone References are Frequently Misquoted.勒温内克安全区参考值经常被错误引用。
Arthroplast Today. 2020 Nov 26;6(4):945-953. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2020.09.011. eCollection 2020 Dec.
3
Radiographic assessment of the cup orientation after total hip arthroplasty: a literature review.
全髋关节置换术后髋臼假体位置的影像学评估:文献综述
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Feb;8(4):130. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.12.150.