Pichl J, Kremer M, Hoffmann R
Unfallchirurgie und Orthopädische Chirurgie, Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Frankfurt.
Z Orthop Unfall. 2011 Oct;149(5):510-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1270973. Epub 2011 Apr 8.
The objective of this study was to asses the accuracy of conventional cup navigation with 2D-fluoroscopy compared to free-hand positioning in total hip arthroplasty.
A test of the procedure in a plastic bone model of the pelvis was undertaken: the implantation of 28 cups respecting the individual pelvic tilt was evaluated. The intraoperative determination of a reference plane for navigation by fluoroscopic matching of the anterior pelvic ring with the pre-operative X-ray of the pelvis was performed. The target zone was a radiological inclination 40 ± 10° and a radiological anteversion 15 ± 10°. Measurement of cup position was done with 3D-CT respecting the pelvic tilt and additionally with conventional X-ray images. CLINICAL APPLICATION IN PATIENTS: A comparison was made of 80 consecutive, in 2008 operated patients (navigation group) with 80 consecutive in 2006 operated patients (free-hand group). Measurement of cup position in both groups was made with conventional X-ray of the pelvis (mean value and standard deviation of radiological inclination and anteversion, the number of outliers of the target zone in navigation group and free-hand group).
In plastic bone models all cups were positioned in the target zone. Measurement of radiological inclination and anteversion with 3D-CT and X-ray demonstrated a good concordance (mean difference CT versus X-ray for inclination 0.625°, max. 2°, for anteversion 0.75°, max. 3°). In patients, conventional cup navigation was significantly superior to free-hand positioning in anteversion (SD 2.9° nav, SD 8.1° free, outliers of target zone: n = 2 nav, n = 18 free). No significant differences were detected in inclination.
The coronal plane of the patient was found to be a valid plane for cup navigation that can be determined by intraoperative fluoroscopy. The method allows for a safe positioning of the cup in the target zone for inclination and anteversion. Conventional cup navigation with 2D-fluoroscopy is simple and safe with limited investment in time, manpower and material.
本研究的目的是评估在全髋关节置换术中,与徒手定位相比,二维透视下传统髋臼杯导航的准确性。
在骨盆塑料骨模型上对该手术进行测试:评估28个髋臼杯在考虑个体骨盆倾斜情况下的植入情况。通过透视将骨盆前环与术前骨盆X线片进行匹配,术中确定导航的参考平面。目标区域为放射学倾斜度40±10°和放射学前倾角15±10°。使用考虑骨盆倾斜的三维CT以及传统X线图像测量髋臼杯位置。
对2008年连续手术的80例患者(导航组)与2006年连续手术的80例患者(徒手组)进行比较。两组均使用骨盆传统X线测量髋臼杯位置(放射学倾斜度和前倾角的平均值及标准差,导航组和徒手组目标区域的异常值数量)。
在塑料骨模型中,所有髋臼杯均定位在目标区域。三维CT和X线测量放射学倾斜度和前倾角显示出良好的一致性(倾斜度CT与X线的平均差值为0.625°,最大2°;前倾角为0.75°,最大3°)。在患者中,传统髋臼杯导航在前倾角方面明显优于徒手定位(导航组标准差2.9°,徒手组标准差8.1°,目标区域异常值:导航组n = 2,徒手组n = 18)。在倾斜度方面未检测到显著差异。
发现患者的冠状面是髋臼杯导航的有效平面,可通过术中透视确定。该方法可将髋臼杯安全定位在倾斜度和前倾角的目标区域。二维透视下的传统髋臼杯导航简单安全,在时间、人力和物力方面投入有限。