Suppr超能文献

限制青少年获取和接触烟草的政策:政策过程初期的科学忽视。

Policies that limit youth access and exposure to tobacco: a scientific neglect of the first stages of the policy process.

机构信息

Department of Health Promotion, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, P. Debyeplein 1, 6229, HA, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Trimbos Institute, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2019 Jun 26;19(1):825. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7073-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Policymakers can adopt and implement various supply-side policies to limit youth access and exposure to tobacco, such as increasing the minimum age of sale, limiting the number or type of tobacco outlets, or banning the display of tobacco products. Many studies have assessed the impact of these policies, while less is known about the preceding policy process. The aim of our review was to assess the available evidence on the preceding process of agenda setting, policy formulation, and policy legitimation.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted using the PubMed and the Social Sciences Citation Index databases. After selection, 200 international peer-reviewed articles were identified and analyzed. Through a process of close reading, evidence based on scientific enquiry and anecdotal evidence on agenda setting, policy formulation and policy legitimation was abstracted from each article.

RESULTS

Scientific evidence on the policy process is scarce for these policies, as most of the evidence found was anecdotal. Only one study provided evidence based on a scientific analysis of data on the agenda setting and legitimation phases of policy processes that led to the adoption of display bans in two Australian jurisdictions.

CONCLUSION

The processes influencing the adoption of youth access and exposure policies have been grossly understudied. A better understanding of the policy process is essential to understand country variations in tobacco control policy.

摘要

背景

政策制定者可以采取并实施各种供应方政策,以限制青少年接触和暴露于烟草,例如提高销售最低年龄、限制烟草销售点的数量或类型,或禁止展示烟草产品。许多研究评估了这些政策的影响,而对于之前的政策过程知之甚少。我们的综述旨在评估关于议程设置、政策制定和政策合法化的前期过程的现有证据。

方法

使用 PubMed 和社会科学引文索引数据库进行了系统的文献搜索。经过选择,确定了 200 篇国际同行评议文章并进行了分析。通过仔细阅读,从每篇文章中提取了基于科学探究的证据以及关于议程设置、政策制定和政策合法化的轶事证据。

结果

这些政策的政策过程的科学证据很少,因为大多数证据都是轶事证据。只有一项研究提供了基于对导致澳大利亚两个司法管辖区采用展示禁令的政策过程的议程设置和合法化阶段的数据分析的科学分析的证据。

结论

影响青少年接触和暴露政策采用的过程受到严重低估。更好地了解政策过程对于理解烟草控制政策在各国的差异至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f94a/6595563/c9d6f9d14122/12889_2019_7073_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验