• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Impact of a multifaceted and multidisciplinary intervention on pain, agitation and delirium management in a Canadian community intensive care unit: a quality improvement study protocol.多方面多学科干预对加拿大社区重症监护病房疼痛、躁动和谵妄管理的影响:一项质量改进研究方案
CMAJ Open. 2019 Jun 26;7(2):E430-E434. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20190015. Print 2019 Apr-Jun.
2
Impact of a multifaceted and multidisciplinary intervention on pain, agitation and delirium management in an intensive care unit: an experience of a Canadian community hospital in conducting a quality improvement project.多方面多学科干预对重症监护病房疼痛、躁动和谵妄管理的影响:加拿大社区医院开展质量改进项目的经验。
BMJ Open Qual. 2021 Dec;10(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001305.
3
Qualitative descriptive study to explore nurses' perceptions and experience on pain, agitation and delirium management in a community intensive care unit.一项探索社区重症监护病房护士对疼痛、躁动和谵妄管理的看法和经验的定性描述性研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 4;9(4):e024328. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024328.
4
Impact of a nurse engagement intervention on pain, agitation and delirium assessment in a community intensive care unit.护士参与干预对社区重症监护病房疼痛、躁动和谵妄评估的影响。
BMJ Open Qual. 2019 Aug 5;8(3):e000421. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000421. eCollection 2019.
5
Multifaceted intervention including Facebook-groups to improve guideline-adherence in ICU: A quasi-experimental interrupted time series study.多方面干预措施,包括 Facebook 群组,以提高 ICU 中的指南依从性:一项准实验性中断时间序列研究。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2021 Nov;65(10):1466-1474. doi: 10.1111/aas.13969. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
6
Management of pain, agitation, and delirium in critically ill patients.危重症患者疼痛、躁动及谵妄的管理
Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2014;124(3):114-23. doi: 10.20452/pamw.2136. Epub 2014 Dec 10.
7
Implementation of a protocol for integrated management of pain, agitation, and delirium can improve clinical outcomes in the intensive care unit: a randomized clinical trial.实施疼痛、躁动和谵妄的综合管理方案可改善重症监护病房的临床转归:一项随机临床试验。
J Crit Care. 2013 Dec;28(6):918-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.06.019. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
8
Pain, agitation and delirium assessment and management in a community medical-surgical ICU: results from a prospective observational study and nurse survey.社区内科-外科重症监护病房中疼痛、躁动及谵妄的评估与管理:一项前瞻性观察研究及护士调查的结果
BMJ Open Qual. 2018 Oct 15;7(4):e000413. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000413. eCollection 2018.
9
A Quality Improvement Project to Increase Adherence to a Pain, Agitation, and Delirium Protocol in the Intensive Care Unit.一项旨在提高重症监护病房疼痛、躁动和谵妄治疗方案依从性的质量改进项目。
Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2019 May/Jun;38(3):174-181. doi: 10.1097/DCC.0000000000000353.
10
Gaps in pain, agitation and delirium management in intensive care: Outputs from a nurse workshop.重症监护病房疼痛、躁动和谵妄管理中的差距:护士工作坊的产出。
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2018 Oct;48:52-60. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2018.01.008.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of a multifaceted and multidisciplinary intervention on pain, agitation and delirium management in an intensive care unit: an experience of a Canadian community hospital in conducting a quality improvement project.多方面多学科干预对重症监护病房疼痛、躁动和谵妄管理的影响:加拿大社区医院开展质量改进项目的经验。
BMJ Open Qual. 2021 Dec;10(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001305.

本文引用的文献

1
Applying the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) approach to a large pragmatic study involving safety net clinics.将计划-执行-研究-行动(PDSA)方法应用于一项涉及安全网诊所的大型实用性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jun 19;17(1):411. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2364-3.
2
Improving Hospital Survival and Reducing Brain Dysfunction at Seven California Community Hospitals: Implementing PAD Guidelines Via the ABCDEF Bundle in 6,064 Patients.改善加利福尼亚州 7 家社区医院的住院患者存活率和降低其脑功能障碍发生率:通过 ABCDEF 集束干预在 6064 例患者中实施 PAD 指南。
Crit Care Med. 2017 Feb;45(2):171-178. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002149.
3
Staff education, regular sedation and analgesia quality feedback, and a sedation monitoring technology for improving sedation and analgesia quality for critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients: a cluster randomised trial.医护人员教育、常规镇静和镇痛质量反馈以及镇静监测技术可提高重症机械通气患者的镇静和镇痛质量:一项整群随机试验。
Lancet Respir Med. 2016 Oct;4(10):807-817. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(16)30178-3. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
4
Barriers and facilitators of nurses' use of clinical practice guidelines: An integrative review.护士使用临床实践指南的障碍与促进因素:一项综合综述。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2016 Aug;60:54-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.03.006. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
5
How do doctors and nurses manage delirium in intensive care units? A qualitative study using focus groups.医生和护士如何在重症监护病房中管理谵妄?一项使用焦点小组的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 29;6(1):e009678. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009678.
6
Validity and sensitivity of 6 pain scales in critically ill, intubated adults.6种疼痛量表在重症插管成年患者中的有效性和敏感性
Am J Crit Care. 2015 Nov;24(6):514-23. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2015832.
7
Delirium in critical care: a study of incidence, prevalence, and associated factors in the tertiary care hospital of older Thai adults.重症监护中的谵妄:泰国老年成年人三级医院的发病率、患病率及相关因素研究
Aging Ment Health. 2016;20(1):74-80. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2015.1035695. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
8
Speech pathologists' experiences with stroke clinical practice guidelines and the barriers and facilitators influencing their use: a national descriptive study.言语病理学家在中风临床实践指南方面的经验以及影响其使用的障碍和促进因素:一项全国性描述性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Mar 6;14:110. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-110.
9
Barriers to prevention of cardiovascular disease in primary care settings in Argentina.阿根廷初级保健环境中心血管疾病预防的障碍。
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2013 Apr;33(4):259-66. doi: 10.1590/s1020-49892013000400004.
10
Decreasing severe pain and serious adverse events while moving intensive care unit patients: a prospective interventional study (the NURSE-DO project).在转运重症监护病房患者时减轻剧痛和严重不良事件:一项前瞻性干预研究(护士-医生项目)
Crit Care. 2013 Apr 18;17(2):R74. doi: 10.1186/cc12683.

多方面多学科干预对加拿大社区重症监护病房疼痛、躁动和谵妄管理的影响:一项质量改进研究方案

Impact of a multifaceted and multidisciplinary intervention on pain, agitation and delirium management in a Canadian community intensive care unit: a quality improvement study protocol.

作者信息

Penuela Mercedes Camargo, Law Madelyn, Chung Han-Oh, Faught Brent E, Tsang Jennifer L Y

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences (Camargo Penuela, Law, Faught), Brock University; Niagara Health (Camargo Penuela, Chung, Tsang), St. Catharines, Ont.; Department of Medicine (Chung, Tsang), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Niagara Regional Campus (Chung, Tsang), Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, St. Catharines, Ont.

出版信息

CMAJ Open. 2019 Jun 26;7(2):E430-E434. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20190015. Print 2019 Apr-Jun.

DOI:10.9778/cmajo.20190015
PMID:31243059
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6597341/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pain and agitation are closely linked to the development of delirium, which affects 60%-87% of critically ill patients. Delirium is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. Clinical guidelines that suggest routine assessment, treatment and prevention of pain, agitation and delirium (PAD) is crucial to improving patient outcomes. However, the adoption of and adherence to PAD guidelines remain suboptimal, especially in community hospitals. The aim of this quality improvement study is to evaluate the impact of a multifaceted and multidisciplinary intervention on PAD management in a Canadian community intensive care unit (ICU).

METHODS

This is a quality improvement, uncontrolled, before-and-after study of a multifaceted and multidisciplinary intervention targeting nurses (educational modules, visual reminders), family members (interviews, educational pamphlets and an educational video), physicians (multidisciplinary round script) and the multidisciplinary team as a whole (delirium poster). We will collect data every day for 6 weeks before implementing the intervention. Data collection will include clinical information and information on process of care. We will then implement the intervention. Four weeks after, we will collect data daily for 6 weeks to evaluate the effect of the intervention. On the basis of the volume of the ICU, we expect to enroll approximately 280 patients. We have obtained local ethics approval from the Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board (HiREB 18-040-C).

INTERPRETATION

The results of this quality improvement study will provide information on adherence to PAD guidelines in a Canadian community ICU setting. They will also supply information on the feasibility of implementing multifaceted and multidisciplinary PAD interventions in community ICUs.

摘要

背景

疼痛和躁动与谵妄的发生密切相关,谵妄影响60%-87%的重症患者。谵妄与死亡率和发病率的增加有关。临床指南建议对疼痛、躁动和谵妄(PAD)进行常规评估、治疗和预防,这对改善患者预后至关重要。然而,PAD指南的采用和遵循情况仍不理想,尤其是在社区医院。这项质量改进研究的目的是评估多方面、多学科干预对加拿大社区重症监护病房(ICU)中PAD管理的影响。

方法

这是一项针对护士(教育模块、视觉提示)、家庭成员(访谈、教育手册和教育视频)、医生(多学科查房脚本)以及整个多学科团队(谵妄海报)的多方面、多学科干预的质量改进、非对照前后研究。在实施干预前,我们将连续6周每天收集数据。数据收集将包括临床信息和护理过程信息。然后我们将实施干预。四周后,我们将连续6周每天收集数据以评估干预效果。根据ICU的规模,我们预计纳入约280名患者。我们已获得汉密尔顿综合研究伦理委员会(HiREB 18-040-C)的当地伦理批准。

解读

这项质量改进研究的结果将提供有关加拿大社区ICU环境中遵循PAD指南的信息。它们还将提供有关在社区ICU中实施多方面、多学科PAD干预措施的可行性的信息。