From the Department of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Neurology. 2019 Jul 30;93(5):e518-e521. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000007857. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
To determine whether high placebo effects observed in recently published clinical noninvasive vagal nerve stimulation (nVNS) trials can be attributed to an active modulation of the trigeminal-autonomic reflex by the sham device.
Twenty-eight healthy participants were investigated in a randomized, controlled, single-blind, within-participant design. The 4 different conditions of no stimulation, regular nVNS of the left cervical vagal nerve, stimulation of the posterior neck with the same device (sham I), and stimulation of the left cervical vagal nerve with a sham device (sham II) were applied in randomized order. Parasympathetic output (lacrimation) was provoked with kinetic oscillation stimulation (KOS) of the nasal mucosa. Lacrimation was quantified with the Schirmer II test, an objective measure of lacrimal secretion after local anesthesia, and the difference between baseline and KOS-induced lacrimation served as a measure of autonomic output.
nVNS treatment resulted in a significant reduction of ipsilateral KOS-induced lacrimation compared to no stimulation ( = 0.003) and sham I ( = 0.02). A similar effect was observed for sham II ( = 0.003, = 0.001). There was no significant difference between nVNS and sham II.
These results suggest that both the regular nVNS and the sham device used in some of the clinical nVNS trials modulate the trigeminal-autonomic reflex. This could explain the high sham effect in these trials and suggests that stimulation of the posterior neck may be considered as a real sham condition.
确定最近发表的临床非侵入性迷走神经刺激(nVNS)试验中观察到的高安慰剂效应是否归因于假设备对三叉自主反射的主动调节。
28 名健康参与者按照随机、对照、单盲、自身参与者设计进行研究。以随机顺序应用 4 种不同的刺激条件:无刺激、左侧颈迷走神经的常规 nVNS、同器械刺激后颈部(假刺激 I)和假器械刺激左侧颈迷走神经(假刺激 II)。使用鼻黏膜动力振荡刺激(KOS)诱发副交感神经输出(流泪)。用 Schirmer II 试验(局部麻醉后泪液分泌的客观测量)定量测量流泪,基线和 KOS 诱发流泪之间的差异作为自主神经输出的测量。
与无刺激( = 0.003)和假刺激 I( = 0.02)相比,nVNS 治疗导致同侧 KOS 诱发的流泪明显减少。假刺激 II 也观察到类似的效果( = 0.003, = 0.001)。nVNS 和假刺激 II 之间没有显著差异。
这些结果表明,常规 nVNS 和一些临床 nVNS 试验中使用的假设备均调节三叉自主反射。这可以解释这些试验中高假效应,并表明刺激后颈部可被视为真正的假条件。