Suppr超能文献

无药非侵入性热神经阻滞:假装置的验证

Drug-Free Noninvasive Thermal Nerve Block: Validation of Sham Devices.

作者信息

Fishman Michael A, Chitneni Ahish, Abd-Elsayed Alaa, Grodofsky Samuel, Scherer Ashley M, Schetzner Brendan, Klusek Malvina, Popielarski Stephen R, Meloni Stephen, Falowski Steven, Kim Philip, Slavin Konstantin V, Silberstein Stephen D

机构信息

Center for Pain Control PC, Lancaster, PA 19610, USA.

Department of Rehabilitation and Regenerative Medicine, New York-Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia and Cornell, New York, NY 10065, USA.

出版信息

Brain Sci. 2023 Dec 15;13(12):1718. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13121718.

Abstract

Headache is a leading cause of disability and suffering. One major challenge in developing device treatments is demonstrating their efficacy given devices' often-high placebo rate. This paper reviews the importance of validating sham devices as part of finalizing the design for larger-scale prospective randomized controlled trials in patients with chronic headache as well as the results of a prospective, single-blind trial to validate two potential sham noninvasive thermal nerve block devices. Study participants were trained to self-administer thermal nerve block treatment using sham devices in an office visit. Two different sham systems with different temperature profiles were assessed. Devices were offered for patients to use daily at-home for one week to assess the durability of sham placebo effects before participants were given active treatment in a second office visit followed by another optional week of self-administered active treatment at-home use. Sham treatments reduced pain scores by an average of 31% from 6.0 ± 2.3 to 4.3 ± 3.3, including two participants who fell asleep during the in-office treatment and woke up with no pain, but whose pain recurred after returning home during at-home use of the sham system. In-office active treatments reduced pain scores by 52% from 6.7 ± 2.1 to 3.3 ± 2.9 with sustained pain relief during optional at-home use. Successful blinding for the study was confirmed with an ideal Bang's Blinding Index of 0 and an ideal James' Blinding Index of 1. Both the sham and active treatments were viewed by participants as highly credible, and credibility increased from the beginning to end of sham treatments on average.

摘要

头痛是导致残疾和痛苦的主要原因。在开发器械治疗方法时,一个主要挑战是鉴于器械通常较高的安慰剂率,证明其疗效。本文回顾了在确定针对慢性头痛患者的大规模前瞻性随机对照试验设计时,验证假器械的重要性,以及一项前瞻性单盲试验的结果,该试验旨在验证两种潜在的假无创热神经阻滞器械。研究参与者在一次门诊就诊时接受培训,使用假器械自行进行热神经阻滞治疗。评估了两种具有不同温度曲线的不同假系统。在参与者于第二次门诊就诊接受积极治疗之前,提供器械供患者在家中每天使用一周,以评估假安慰剂效应的持续性,随后还有另一周的在家自行进行积极治疗的可选时间。假治疗使疼痛评分平均从6.0±2.3降低到4.3±3.3,降幅为31%,其中包括两名参与者,他们在门诊治疗期间入睡,醒来时疼痛消失,但在回家使用假系统期间疼痛复发。门诊积极治疗使疼痛评分从6.7±2.1降低到3.3±2.9,降幅为52%,在可选的在家使用期间疼痛持续缓解。该研究的成功设盲通过理想的班氏设盲指数为0和理想的詹姆斯设盲指数为1得到证实。参与者认为假治疗和积极治疗都非常可信,并且平均而言,从假治疗开始到结束,可信度有所提高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9718/10741966/9cd2fe7e0f4b/brainsci-13-01718-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验