Division of Virology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Christian Doppler Laboratory for Viral Immunotherapy of Cancer, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
J Virol. 2019 Aug 28;93(18). doi: 10.1128/JVI.00567-19. Print 2019 Sep 15.
Neutralization by antibodies and complement limits the effective dose and thus the therapeutic efficacy of oncolytic viruses after systemic application. We and others previously showed that pseudotyping of oncolytic rhabdoviruses such as maraba virus and vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) with the lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus glycoprotein (LCMV-GP) results in only a weak induction of neutralizing antibodies. Moreover, LCMV-GP-pseudotyped VSV (VSV-GP) was significantly more stable in normal human serum (NHS) than VSV. Here, we demonstrate that depending on the cell line used for virus production, VSV-GP showed different complement sensitivities in nonimmune NHS. The NHS-mediated titer reduction of VSV-GP was dependent on activation of the classical complement pathway, mainly by natural IgM antibodies against xenoantigens such as galactose-α-(1,3)-galactose (α-Gal) or -glycolylneuraminic acid (Neu5Gc) expressed on nonhuman production cell lines. VSV-GP produced on human cell lines was stable in NHS. However, VSV-GP generated in transduced human cells expressing α-Gal became sensitive to NHS. Furthermore, GP-specific antibodies induced complement-mediated neutralization of VSV-GP independently of the producer cell line, suggesting that complement regulatory proteins potentially acquired by the virus during the budding process are not sufficient to rescue the virus from antibody-dependent complement-mediated lysis. Thus, our study points to the importance of a careful selection of cell lines for viral vector production for clinical use. Systemic application aims to deliver oncolytic viruses to tumors as well as to metastatic lesions. However, we found that xenoantigens incorporated onto the viral surface from nonhuman production cell lines are recognized by natural antibodies in human serum and that the virus is thereby inactivated by complement lysis. Hence, to maximize the effective dose, careful selection of cell lines for virus production is crucial.
抗体和补体的中和作用限制了有效剂量,从而降低了全身性应用后的溶瘤病毒的治疗效果。我们和其他人之前曾表明,用淋巴细胞性脉络丛脑膜炎病毒糖蛋白(LCMV-GP)对溶瘤弹状病毒(如马拉开波病毒和水疱性口炎病毒(VSV))进行假型化只会导致弱中和抗体的诱导。此外,与 VSV 相比,LCMV-GP 假型化的 VSV(VSV-GP)在正常人体血清(NHS)中更为稳定。在这里,我们证明了,根据用于生产病毒的细胞系,VSV-GP 在非免疫 NHS 中的补体敏感性不同。NHS 介导的 VSV-GP 滴度降低依赖于经典补体途径的激活,主要是通过针对非人生产细胞系上表达的异种抗原(如半乳糖-α-(1,3)-半乳糖(α-Gal)或-神经氨酸苷酸(Neu5Gc)的天然 IgM 抗体。在 NHS 中,在人细胞系上生产的 VSV-GP 是稳定的。然而,在转导表达α-Gal 的人细胞中产生的 VSV-GP 对 NHS 变得敏感。此外,GP 特异性抗体独立于产生细胞系诱导补体介导的 VSV-GP 中和,表明病毒在出芽过程中获得的补体调节蛋白不足以使其免受抗体依赖性补体介导的裂解。因此,我们的研究表明,在临床应用中,仔细选择用于病毒载体生产的细胞系非常重要。全身应用旨在将溶瘤病毒递送到肿瘤以及转移病灶。然而,我们发现,从非人类生产细胞系掺入病毒表面的异种抗原被人血清中的天然抗体识别,并且病毒因此被补体溶解失活。因此,为了最大限度地提高有效剂量,仔细选择用于病毒生产的细胞系至关重要。