Xiao Jinnan, Chow Ka Ming, Liu Yunhong, Chan Carmen W H
The Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Psychooncology. 2019 Sep;28(9):1791-1802. doi: 10.1002/pon.5162. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
The review aims to identify available evidence related to the effects of dignity therapy on dignity, psychological well-being, and quality of life (QoL) among patients with cancer under palliative care.
Thirteen electronic databases were searched for published articles in English or Chinese from inception to May 2018. Methodological rigour was assessed through the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist for randomised controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies. Sufficient data from four trials were statistically pooled with Review Manager; otherwise, a narrative summary was used.
Ten articles describing eight studies met the selection criteria and were included in the review. None of the studies met all JBI checklist criteria. Meta-analysis results revealed that dignity therapy significantly improved dignity-related distress in existential distress domain (mean differences [MD]: -0.26, 95% CI, -0.50 to -0.02, .03) and social support domain (MD: -0.23, 95% CI, -0.39 to -0.07, .004), but nonsignificant improved depression and anxiety. Narrative summaries indicated that dignity therapy exerted positive effects on patients' dignity, psychological well-being, and QoL.
Dignity therapy is a promising approach to improve psychological well-being among patients with cancer under palliative care. However, the effects of dignity therapy on dignity and QoL are inconsistent. Further extensive studies should measure the impact of dignity therapy through qualitative and quantitative approaches to establish outcomes in psychological well-being. Studies with sensitivity to the cultural context within which dignity therapy applied should be conducted to explore its effects on patients with cancer at the early stages of illness trajectory.
本综述旨在识别与尊严疗法对姑息治疗下癌症患者的尊严、心理健康及生活质量(QoL)的影响相关的现有证据。
检索了13个电子数据库,查找自数据库建立至2018年5月发表的英文或中文文章。通过乔安娜·布里格斯研究所(JBI)的随机对照试验和准实验研究清单评估方法的严谨性。使用Review Manager对来自四项试验的充分数据进行统计合并;否则,采用叙述性总结。
十篇描述八项研究的文章符合入选标准并纳入本综述。没有一项研究符合JBI清单的所有标准。荟萃分析结果显示,尊严疗法显著改善了存在性痛苦领域(平均差[MD]:-0.26,95%CI,-0.50至-0.02,P = 0.03)和社会支持领域(MD:-0.23,95%CI,-0.39至-0.07,P = 0.004)中与尊严相关的痛苦,但对抑郁和焦虑的改善不显著。叙述性总结表明,尊严疗法对患者的尊严、心理健康和生活质量产生了积极影响。
尊严疗法是改善姑息治疗下癌症患者心理健康的一种有前景的方法。然而,尊严疗法对尊严和生活质量的影响并不一致。应通过定性和定量方法进一步开展广泛研究,以衡量尊严疗法对心理健康结果的影响。应开展对尊严疗法应用的文化背景具有敏感性的研究,以探索其在疾病轨迹早期阶段对癌症患者的影响。