• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中文阅读中的词跳:高频预视和句法恰当性的作用。

Word skipping in Chinese reading: The role of high-frequency preview and syntactic felicity.

机构信息

Academy of Psychology and Behavior.

School of Psychology.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020 Apr;46(4):603-620. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000738. Epub 2019 Jun 27.

DOI:10.1037/xlm0000738
PMID:31246059
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7115127/
Abstract

Two experiments are reported to investigate whether Chinese readers skip a high-frequency preview word without taking the syntax of the sentence context into account. In Experiment 1, we manipulated target word syntactic category, frequency, and preview using the boundary paradigm (Rayner, 1975). For high-frequency verb targets, there were identity and pseudocharacter previews alongside a low-frequency noun preview. For low-frequency verb targets, there were identity and pseudocharacter previews alongside a high-frequency noun preview. Results showed that for high-frequency targets, skipping rates were higher for identical previews compared with the syntactically infelicitous alternative low-frequency preview and pseudocharacter previews, however for low-frequency targets, skipping rates were higher for high-frequency previews (even when they were syntactically infelicitous) compared with the other 2 previews. Furthermore, readers were more likely to skip the target when they had a high-frequency, syntactically felicitous preview compared to a high-frequency, syntactically infelicitous preview. The pattern of felicity effects was statistically robust when readers launched saccades from near the target. In Experiment 2, we assessed whether display change awareness influenced the patterns of results in Experiment 1. Results showed that the overall patterns held in Experiment 2 regardless of some readers being more likely to be aware of the display change than others. These results suggest that decisions to skip a word in Chinese reading are primarily based on parafoveal word familiarity, though the syntactic felicity of a parafoveal word also exerts a robust influence for high-frequency previews. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

两项实验旨在探讨中文读者是否会在不考虑句子语境语法的情况下跳过高频预读词。在实验 1 中,我们使用边界范式(Rayner, 1975)操纵目标词的句法类别、频率和预读。对于高频动词目标词,除了低频名词预读之外,还有身份和伪字符预读。对于低频动词目标词,除了身份和伪字符预读之外,还有高频名词预读。结果表明,对于高频目标词,与语法不当的低频预读和伪字符预读相比,相同预读的跳过率更高;然而,对于低频目标词,高频预读(即使语法不当)的跳过率也高于其他 2 种预读。此外,与高频语法不当的预读相比,读者更有可能在目标词具有高频、语法恰当的预读时跳过目标词。当读者从目标词附近开始扫视时,这种恰当性效应的模式在统计上是稳健的。在实验 2 中,我们评估了显示变化意识是否会影响实验 1 的结果模式。结果表明,无论一些读者是否比其他读者更有可能意识到显示变化,实验 2 的总体模式都保持不变。这些结果表明,在中文阅读中决定跳过一个词主要基于视距外单词的熟悉度,但视距外单词的语法恰当性对高频预读也有很强的影响。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0091/7115127/2c476e8b0617/xlm_46_4_603_fig2a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0091/7115127/30f09406fb9a/xlm_46_4_603_fig1a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0091/7115127/2c476e8b0617/xlm_46_4_603_fig2a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0091/7115127/30f09406fb9a/xlm_46_4_603_fig1a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0091/7115127/2c476e8b0617/xlm_46_4_603_fig2a.jpg

相似文献

1
Word skipping in Chinese reading: The role of high-frequency preview and syntactic felicity.中文阅读中的词跳:高频预视和句法恰当性的作用。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020 Apr;46(4):603-620. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000738. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
2
The influence of foveal lexical processing load on parafoveal preview and saccadic targeting during Chinese reading.中文阅读中中央凹词汇加工负荷对周边预视和眼跳目标的影响。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 Jun;45(6):812-825. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000644.
3
Skipping of the very-high-frequency structural particle de () in Chinese reading.汉语阅读中超高频率结构助词“的”的省略。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Jan 16:1-10. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1272617.
4
The influence of parafoveal preview, character transposition, and word frequency on saccadic targeting in Chinese reading.旁中央凹预视、字符转置和词频对中文阅读中眼跳目标选择的影响。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 Apr;45(4):537-552. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000630.
5
Anticipating syntax during reading: Evidence from the boundary change paradigm.阅读过程中对句法的预期:来自边界变化范式的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Dec;42(12):1894-1906. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000257. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
6
Reversed preview benefit effects: Forced fixations emphasize the importance of parafoveal vision for efficient reading.反向预览效益效应:强制注视强调了副中央凹视觉对高效阅读的重要性。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Dec;42(12):2039-2067. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000270. Epub 2016 Oct 10.
7
Capitalization interacts with syntactic complexity.大写字母与句法复杂度相互作用。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020 Jun;46(6):1146-1164. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000780. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
8
Skipping syntactically illegal the previews: The role of predictability.跳过语法上非法的预览:可预测性的作用。 (不过原英文表述似乎不太准确和完整)
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 Nov;41(6):1703-14. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000142. Epub 2015 Jun 15.
9
Skipping the structural particle de () in reading Chinese: The role of word frequency and sentential fit.跳过中文阅读中的结构助词“的”:词频和句子搭配的作用。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Mar;76(3):528-537. doi: 10.1177/17470218221094315. Epub 2022 May 18.
10
Is semantic preview benefit due to relatedness or plausibility?语义预览的好处是源于相关性还是合理性?
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Jul;42(7):939-52. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000200. Epub 2016 Jan 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Syntactic Information Extraction in the Parafovea: Evidence from Two-Character Phrases in Chinese.副中央凹的句法信息提取:来自中文双字短语的证据。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jul 10;15(7):935. doi: 10.3390/bs15070935.

本文引用的文献

1
Investigating word length effects in Chinese reading.探究中文阅读中的词长效应。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Dec;44(12):1831-1841. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000589.
2
What are the costs of degraded parafoveal previews during silent reading?默读过程中副中央凹预视信息退化的代价是什么?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Mar;44(3):371-386. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000433. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
3
Evidence for simultaneous syntactic processing of multiple words during reading.阅读过程中对多个单词进行同步句法处理的证据。
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 9;12(3):e0173720. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173720. eCollection 2017.
4
Skipping of the very-high-frequency structural particle de () in Chinese reading.汉语阅读中超高频率结构助词“的”的省略。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Jan 16:1-10. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1272617.
5
Parafoveal preview effects depend on both preview plausibility and target predictability.中央凹旁预视效应取决于预视的合理性和目标的可预测性。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016 Oct 28:1-12. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1247894.
6
Parafoveal preview effects from word N + 1 and word N + 2 during reading: A critical review and Bayesian meta-analysis.阅读过程中来自单词N + 1和单词N + 2的中央凹旁预视效应:一项批判性综述与贝叶斯元分析
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Jun;24(3):666-689. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1147-x.
7
Parafoveal preview benefit in sentence reading: Independent effects of plausibility and orthographic relatedness.句子阅读中的中央凹旁预视效应:合理性与正字法相关性的独立作用
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Apr;24(2):519-528. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1120-8.
8
Anticipating syntax during reading: Evidence from the boundary change paradigm.阅读过程中对句法的预期:来自边界变化范式的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Dec;42(12):1894-1906. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000257. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
9
Two stages of parafoveal processing during reading: Evidence from a display change detection task.阅读过程中副中央凹加工的两个阶段:来自显示变化检测任务的证据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Aug;23(4):1241-9. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0995-0.
10
Universality in eye movements and reading: A trilingual investigation.眼球运动与阅读的普遍性:一项三语研究。
Cognition. 2016 Feb;147:1-20. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.10.013. Epub 2015 Nov 19.