Suppr超能文献

衡量道德政治:严格和培养型家庭价值观如何解释保守主义、自由主义和政治中间派个体差异。

Measuring moral politics: How strict and nurturant family values explain individual differences in conservatism, liberalism, and the political middle.

机构信息

Rotman School of Management.

Department of Linguistics.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 Apr;118(4):777-804. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000255. Epub 2019 Jun 27.

Abstract

Individuals' political stances tend to place them into the conservative "right," the liberal "left," or the moderate "middle." What might explain this pattern of division? Moral Politics Theory (Lakoff, 1996) holds that political attitudes arise from moral worldviews that are conceptually anchored in contrasting family models-the strict-father and nurturant-parent models-while the political middle is morally "biconceptual," endorsing both models simultaneously. The present research examined these postulations empirically. Studies 1 and 2 tested the conceptual and predictive validity of the theorized models by developing an instrument assessing strict and nurturant parenting beliefs (the Moral Politics Scale [MPT]), and examining its power to predict political stances on issues seemingly unrelated to parenting attitudes (e.g., abortion, taxes, and same-sex marriage). Studies 3a and 3b explored construct validity while testing whether the family models translate into more general moral worldviews, which then serve as a foundation of political attitudes. Studies 4a through 4c tested generalizability, examining the relationship between the family models and political stances across different countries, data-collection modalities, and a representative American sample. Finally, Studies 5-7 explored biconceptualism and the tendency for these individuals to shift political attitudes as a consequence of situational factors, particularly moral framing, such that strict-father frames lead to increased support for conservative stances while nurturant-parent frames lead to increased support for liberal stances. Overall, we found support for each of MPT's assertions, suggesting that an important aspect of the conceptual and experiential basis of people's political attitudes lies in the strict-father and nurturant-parent family models. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

个体的政治立场倾向于将他们归入保守的“右翼”、自由的“左翼”或温和的“中间派”。是什么导致了这种分裂模式?道德政治理论(Lakoff,1996)认为,政治态度源于道德世界观,这些世界观在概念上以对比鲜明的家庭模式为基础——严格的父亲模式和养育的母亲模式,而政治中间派在道德上是“双概念的”,同时支持这两种模式。本研究从实证角度检验了这些假设。研究 1 和 2 通过开发一种评估严格和养育的父母信念的工具(道德政治量表[MPT]),检验了其预测与父母态度看似无关的问题上的政治立场的能力,检验了理论模型的概念和预测有效性。研究 3a 和 3b 探讨了结构效度,同时检验了家庭模式是否转化为更普遍的道德世界观,然后作为政治态度的基础。研究 4a 至 4c 检验了普遍性,考察了不同国家、数据收集方式和代表性美国样本中家庭模式与政治立场之间的关系。最后,研究 5-7 探讨了双概念主义以及这些个体由于情境因素,特别是道德框架,改变政治态度的倾向,即严格的父亲框架导致对保守立场的支持增加,而养育的母亲框架导致对自由立场的支持增加。总的来说,我们发现 MPT 的每一个主张都得到了支持,这表明人们政治态度的概念和经验基础的一个重要方面在于严格的父亲和养育的母亲家庭模式。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验