• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会认同与动物:剖析我们与其他动物的心理联系。

Social identification with animals: Unpacking our psychological connection with other animals.

机构信息

Departement de psychologie.

Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 May;118(5):991-1017. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000199. Epub 2019 Jun 27.

DOI:10.1037/pspi0000199
PMID:31246065
Abstract

Our relations with other animals are ubiquitous in human life, yet the psychological structure of our connection with animals is just beginning to receive empirical attention. Drawing on theories of social identification and intergroup relations, we investigate the various ways that people identify with animals. Across 7 studies, we introduce the Identification with Animals Measure (IWAM) and uncover 3 dimensions by which humans identify with animals as a group: solidarity with animals, animal pride, and human-animal similarity. First, we establish the reliability, factorial structure, and predictive validity of the 3-factor IWAM. Next, we find that these factors predict a distinct set of attitudes and behaviors toward animals. Solidarity with animals is defined by feeling connected to other animals and is associated with more contact with animals (i.e., pets) and a greater desire to help animals and to engage in collective actions on their behalf, even if this implies withdrawing privileges to humans. Human-animal similarity is defined by the perception that animals share similarities with humans; this dimension is associated with increased moral concern for their welfare and a greater attribution of typically human traits to other animals. Finally, animal pride is defined by a direct recognition and positive endorsement of the social category that includes all animals, and is associated with viewing humans as more animal-like, and with more competitive and instrumental intergroup relations. The findings confirm that identification with animals is a multidimensional construct that is colored by the unique and complex nature of our relations with nonhuman animals. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

人类与其他动物的关系在生活中无处不在,然而,人类与动物关系的心理结构才刚刚开始受到实证关注。本研究借鉴社会认同和群体关系理论,考察了人们认同动物的各种方式。通过 7 项研究,我们引入了动物认同量表(IWAM),并揭示了人类作为一个群体认同动物的 3 个维度:与动物的团结、动物自豪感和人与动物的相似性。首先,我们确定了 3 因素 IWAM 的可靠性、因素结构和预测有效性。其次,我们发现这些因素预测了对动物的一系列独特态度和行为。与动物的团结是指与其他动物建立联系的感觉,与更多地接触动物(即宠物)以及更强烈地帮助动物和代表它们采取集体行动有关,即使这意味着剥夺人类的特权。人与动物的相似性是指动物与人类有相似之处的认知;这一维度与对动物福利的更大道德关注以及更倾向于将典型的人类特征归因于其他动物有关。最后,动物自豪感是指对包括所有动物的社会范畴的直接认可和积极认可,与将人类视为更像动物、具有更多竞争和工具性的群体关系有关。研究结果证实,动物认同是一个多维度的结构,其特点是人类与非人类动物的独特而复杂的关系。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Social identification with animals: Unpacking our psychological connection with other animals.社会认同与动物:剖析我们与其他动物的心理联系。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 May;118(5):991-1017. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000199. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
2
Solidarity with Animals: Assessing a Relevant Dimension of Social Identification with Animals.对动物的同情:评估与动物社会认同的一个相关维度。
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 3;12(1):e0168184. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168184. eCollection 2017.
3
Moral expansiveness: Examining variability in the extension of the moral world.道德扩展性:审视道德世界外延的变异性。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016 Oct;111(4):636-53. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000086. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
4
Generalized exchange orientation: Conceptualization and scale development.广义交换取向:概念化与量表编制。
J Appl Psychol. 2020 Mar;105(3):294-311. doi: 10.1037/apl0000438. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
5
The malleable morality of conspicuous consumption.炫耀性消费的可塑道德观。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 Mar;118(3):562-583. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000237. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
6
The moral standing of animals: Towards a psychology of speciesism.动物的道德地位:走向物种主义心理学。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019 Jun;116(6):1011-1029. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000182. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
7
Intergroup contact, social dominance, and environmental concern: A test of the cognitive-liberalization hypothesis.群体间接触、社会支配和环境关注:对认知解放假说的检验。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 Jun;118(6):1146-1164. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000196. Epub 2019 May 23.
8
Multiple categorization and intergroup bias: Examining the generalizability of three theories of intergroup relations.多重分类与群体间偏见:检验三种群体关系理论的普遍性。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2022 Jan;122(1):34-52. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000342. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
9
The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO₇ scale.社会支配取向的本质:使用新的SDO₇量表对群体间不平等偏好进行理论化和测量。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015 Dec;109(6):1003-28. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000033. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
10
Intergroup Leadership Across Distinct Subgroups and Identities.跨不同亚群体和身份的群体领导。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2018 Jul;44(7):1090-1103. doi: 10.1177/0146167218757466. Epub 2018 Mar 11.

引用本文的文献

1
An experimental study focusing on mindfulness to capture how our contacts with dogs can promote human well-being.一项聚焦于正念的实验研究,旨在探究我们与狗的接触如何促进人类福祉。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):23202. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-00872-z.
2
People and Pets in the COVID-19 Pandemic and the Cost-of-Living Crisis: Identifying Trends in the Intake, Adoption and Return of Companion Animals During Times of Uncertainty.新冠疫情与生活成本危机下的人与宠物:确定不确定性时期伴侣动物收容、领养及归还的趋势
Animals (Basel). 2025 May 29;15(11):1584. doi: 10.3390/ani15111584.
3
Exploring the role of our contacts with pets in broadening concerns for animals, nature, and fellow humans: a representative study.
探讨与宠物的接触在拓宽对动物、自然和人类同胞的关注方面的作用:一项具有代表性的研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 10;13(1):17079. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43680-z.
4
Ideological resistance to veg*n advocacy: An identity-based motivational account.对纯素倡导的意识形态抵制:基于身份认同的动机解释。
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 30;13:996250. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.996250. eCollection 2022.
5
Man's best friend(s): Effects of a brief befriending meditation on human-animal relations.人类最好的朋友:一次简短的交友冥想对人与动物关系的影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 16;17(12):e0278704. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278704. eCollection 2022.
6
Toward more equal and mutual human-pet relations: Insights and possible solutions based on social psychological theories.迈向更平等和相互的人宠关系:基于社会心理学理论的见解与可能的解决方案。
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Nov 9;9:1009267. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.1009267. eCollection 2022.
7
Classic Psychedelics and Human-Animal Relations.经典迷幻药与人类-动物关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 1;19(13):8114. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19138114.
8
Exploring the need for external input through the prism of social, material and sensation seeking input.通过社会、物质和寻求刺激的输入这一视角来探究对外部输入的需求。
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 May 24;9(5):211373. doi: 10.1098/rsos.211373. eCollection 2022 May.
9
Meating Conflict: Toward a Model of Ambivalence-Motivated Reduction of Meat Consumption.应对冲突:迈向由矛盾心理驱动的减少肉类消费模式
Foods. 2022 Mar 23;11(7):921. doi: 10.3390/foods11070921.
10
Intransigent compassion: Human and non-human animal self-similarity and meat avoidance intent dataset.顽固的同情心:人类与非人类动物的自我相似性及避免食用肉类意图数据集。
Data Brief. 2021 Aug 21;38:107318. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2021.107318. eCollection 2021 Oct.