School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, El Paso, Texas.
Center for Research on Lifelong STEM Learning, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2019 Sep;13(3):225-237. doi: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000442.
This review covers articles in 2018 and early 2019 that employed the concept of networks and social interactions in research on how patients with cancer cope, receive and respond to medical treatment and allied support. The use of social aspects, and more formally the method of social network analysis for research on social aspects of cancer is quite new. Although we paid special attention to articles that used formal social network analysis, we noted that those articles cover just over a quarter of the material we reviewed. Most articles that incorporated social aspects of cancer did not intend to formalize those aspects but treated the network concept as a way to characterize social support, social influence, or social responsibilities.
We identified 74 recent articles that mentioned the network concept for research about cancer, excluding gene interaction networks. Of those 74 articles, 21 measured specific relationships between individuals or organizations and/or attributes of those individuals or organizations connected to participants or to others. Primary foci of the network analysis and nonnetwork analysis studies were breast cancer, social support for patients, and they usually at least considered sex and age of the cancer patients/survivors. Social media received some attention, and there were some studies considering quality of life and mental health. Among network analysis studies, size of network and number of people providing emotional/informational/instrumental support occurred in more than a couple studies but not the majority. There was little similarity among studies - whether using network analysis or not - suggesting that theory building and methodological development are in early stages.
Implications of the review include opportunities for more systematic research using the network concept to understand people's experience of cancer as well as research on cancer. Researchers can make considerable contributions at this stage in the field's development, and practitioners can help develop interventions that make fuller use of the insights of social network analysis.
本综述涵盖了 2018 年和 2019 年初的文章,这些文章在研究癌症患者如何应对、接受和回应医疗和相关支持方面运用了网络和社交互动的概念。利用社会方面,更正式地说,利用社会网络分析方法研究癌症的社会方面是相当新的。虽然我们特别关注使用正式社会网络分析的文章,但我们注意到这些文章仅涵盖了我们所综述材料的四分之一以上。大多数纳入癌症社会方面的文章并没有打算将这些方面形式化,而是将网络概念作为一种描述社会支持、社会影响或社会责任的方式。
我们确定了 74 篇最近提到网络概念的研究癌症的文章,不包括基因相互作用网络。在这 74 篇文章中,有 21 篇测量了个体或组织之间的特定关系,以及/或者与参与者或其他人相关的个体或组织的属性。网络分析和非网络分析研究的主要焦点是乳腺癌、患者的社会支持,并且它们通常至少考虑了癌症患者/幸存者的性别和年龄。社交媒体受到了一些关注,也有一些研究考虑了生活质量和心理健康。在网络分析研究中,网络的规模和提供情感/信息/工具支持的人数在超过几项研究中出现,但不是大多数。无论是使用网络分析还是不使用网络分析的研究都没有太多相似之处,这表明理论构建和方法发展仍处于早期阶段。
本综述的意义包括有机会使用网络概念更系统地研究人们对癌症的体验,以及对癌症的研究。研究人员可以在该领域发展的这个阶段做出相当大的贡献,而从业者可以帮助开发更充分利用社会网络分析见解的干预措施。