• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在疾病初期为 2 型糖尿病患者提供自我管理支持方案的效果:一项随机对照试验的结果。

Effectiveness of a self-management support program for type 2 diabetes patients in the first years of illness: Results from a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

NIVEL (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Department of General Practice & Elderly Care Medicine, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Jun 27;14(6):e0218242. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218242. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0218242
PMID:31247039
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6597059/
Abstract

AIMS

To evaluate the immediate and six-month effectiveness of a group-based self-management support program for people diagnosed with type 2 diabetes (1-3 years post diagnosis) on diabetes self-care, distress and cognitions.

METHODS

People with type 2 diabetes were randomized into the intervention (four group-based interactive sessions) or the control group (a single educational lecture) with their partners. Outcomes were measured at baseline, immediately after the third course session and six months later using validated questionnaires on diabetes self-care, distress, illness perceptions, diabetes-related attitudes, empowerment and partner support. Multilevel analyses were conducted according to the intention-to-treat principle using the data from 82 intervention and 86 control group participants, to test for differences in changes over time between the two groups.

RESULTS

The intervention group showed a significantly higher increase in physical activity and fruit and vegetable intake immediately after the program, whereas the low baseline levels of diabetes distress remained unaffected. Furthermore, the intervention group believed their illness to be more likely to be caused by chance/bad luck, but also felt more empowered to handle their condition and its treatment immediately after the program compared with the control group. Six months later, only the differences in empowerment had persisted.

CONCLUSIONS

Group-based self-management support results in favorable short-term behavioral changes and more persistent alterations in (perceived) empowerment in people living in the first years of type 2 diabetes. In order to achieve more sustainable behavioral changes, more prolonged support is necessary. This could be achieved by integrating attention to patients' illness perceptions and continuous self-management support in regular diabetes care.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Netherlands Trial Registry NL3158.

摘要

目的

评估基于小组的自我管理支持计划对 1-3 年内被诊断为 2 型糖尿病患者的糖尿病自我护理、痛苦和认知的即时和六个月效果。

方法

将 2 型糖尿病患者随机分为干预组(四次小组互动课程)或对照组(一次教育讲座),并与他们的伴侣一起参与。使用经过验证的糖尿病自我护理、痛苦、疾病认知、糖尿病相关态度、授权和伴侣支持问卷,在基线、第三次课程结束后立即和六个月后进行评估。根据意向治疗原则,使用 82 名干预组和 86 名对照组参与者的数据进行多层次分析,以检验两组之间随时间变化的差异。

结果

干预组在项目结束后立即显著增加了体力活动和水果及蔬菜摄入量,而糖尿病痛苦的低基线水平则不受影响。此外,干预组认为他们的疾病更有可能是由偶然/运气不佳引起的,但与对照组相比,他们在项目结束后立即感到更有能力处理自己的病情及其治疗。六个月后,只有授权方面的差异仍然存在。

结论

基于小组的自我管理支持可导致短期行为改变更有利,并且在 2 型糖尿病患者的(感知)授权方面更持久的改变。为了实现更可持续的行为改变,需要更长时间的支持。这可以通过在常规糖尿病护理中关注患者的疾病认知和持续的自我管理支持来实现。

试验注册

荷兰试验注册 NL3158。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2421/6597059/87eceb8952a5/pone.0218242.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2421/6597059/87eceb8952a5/pone.0218242.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2421/6597059/87eceb8952a5/pone.0218242.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of a self-management support program for type 2 diabetes patients in the first years of illness: Results from a randomized controlled trial.在疾病初期为 2 型糖尿病患者提供自我管理支持方案的效果:一项随机对照试验的结果。
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 27;14(6):e0218242. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218242. eCollection 2019.
2
Living with diabetes: a group-based self-management support programme for T2DM patients in the early phases of illness and their partners, study protocol of a randomised controlled trial.与糖尿病共处:一项针对疾病早期2型糖尿病患者及其伴侣的基于小组的自我管理支持项目,一项随机对照试验的研究方案
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Apr 1;14:144. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-144.
3
The effects of an empowerment-based self-management intervention on empowerment level, psychological distress, and quality of life in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled trial.基于赋权的自我管理干预对控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者赋权水平、心理困扰和生活质量的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Apr;116:103407. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103407. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
4
Effectiveness of a Web-based tailored interactive health communication application for patients with type 2 diabetes or chronic low back pain: randomized controlled trial.基于网络的定制交互式健康交流应用程序对2型糖尿病患者或慢性下背痛患者的有效性:随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Mar 3;17(3):e53. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3904.
5
Web-based self-management support for people with type 2 diabetes (HeLP-Diabetes): randomised controlled trial in English primary care.基于网络的 2 型糖尿病患者自我管理支持(HeLP-Diabetes):在英国初级保健中的随机对照试验。
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 27;7(9):e016009. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016009.
6
Improving empowerment, motivation, and medical adherence in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled trial of a patient-centered intervention.提高治疗不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者的授权、动机和医疗依从性:一项以患者为中心的干预的随机对照试验。
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Dec;102(12):2238-2245. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.06.014. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
7
The Mental Health in Diabetes Service (MINDS) to enhance psychosocial health: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.糖尿病心理健康服务(MINDS)以促进心理社会健康:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2016 Sep 9;17(1):444. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1561-4.
8
Effectiveness of text message based, diabetes self management support programme (SMS4BG): two arm, parallel randomised controlled trial.基于短信的糖尿病自我管理支持计划(SMS4BG)的有效性:双臂、平行随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2018 May 17;361:k1959. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k1959.
9
A Web-Based Mental Health Intervention to Improve Social and Occupational Functioning in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes (The Springboard Trial): 12-Month Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Trial.基于网络的心理健康干预对 2 型糖尿病成人社会和职业功能的改善(跳板试验):一项随机对照试验的 12 个月结局。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 1;22(12):e16729. doi: 10.2196/16729.
10
Behavioural interventions for type 2 diabetes: an evidence-based analysis.2型糖尿病的行为干预:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009;9(21):1-45. Epub 2009 Oct 1.

引用本文的文献

1
A phased online support program improves self-efficacy and reduces distress in type 2 diabetes patients using mixed methods design.一项采用混合方法设计的分阶段在线支持项目提高了2型糖尿病患者的自我效能并减轻了他们的痛苦。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 13;15(1):29731. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-15786-z.
2
Factors associated with self-management in older adults with multiple chronic conditions: a qualitative study.与患有多种慢性病的老年人自我管理相关的因素:一项定性研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Sep 13;12:1412832. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1412832. eCollection 2024.
3
Navigating Diabetes: Enhancing Self-Management through Education among Diabetic People at the Early Stages of the Disease-A Systematic Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of group-based self-management education for individuals with Type 2 diabetes: a systematic review with meta-analyses and meta-regression.基于群组的自我管理教育对 2 型糖尿病患者的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析及荟萃回归。
Diabet Med. 2017 Aug;34(8):1027-1039. doi: 10.1111/dme.13340. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
2
Inequalities in health care among patients with type 2 diabetes by individual socio-economic status (SES) and regional deprivation: a systematic literature review.2 型糖尿病患者的个体社会经济地位(SES)和地区贫困程度与医疗保健不平等:系统文献回顾。
Int J Equity Health. 2014 Jun 2;13:43. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-13-43.
3
糖尿病管理:通过教育提高早期糖尿病患者的自我管理能力——系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Apr 23;21(5):522. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21050522.
4
Empowerment interventions designed for persons living with chronic disease - a systematic review and meta-analysis of the components and efficacy of format on patient-reported outcomes.赋能干预措施针对的是患有慢性病的人群 - 对格式对患者报告结局的影响的组成部分和效果进行系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Aug 25;23(1):911. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09895-6.
5
Italian guidelines for the treatment of type 2 diabetes.意大利2型糖尿病治疗指南。
Acta Diabetol. 2022 May;59(5):579-622. doi: 10.1007/s00592-022-01857-4. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
State of the science: diabetes self-management interventions led by nurse principal investigators.
科学现状:由护士主要研究者主导的糖尿病自我管理干预措施
West J Nurs Res. 2014 Oct;36(9):1111-57. doi: 10.1177/0193945914532033. Epub 2014 May 7.
4
Living with diabetes: a group-based self-management support programme for T2DM patients in the early phases of illness and their partners, study protocol of a randomised controlled trial.与糖尿病共处:一项针对疾病早期2型糖尿病患者及其伴侣的基于小组的自我管理支持项目,一项随机对照试验的研究方案
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Apr 1;14:144. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-144.
5
Partnering with diabetes educators to improve patient outcomes.与糖尿病教育工作者合作以改善患者治疗效果。
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2014 Feb 12;7:45-53. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S40036. eCollection 2014.
6
What follow-up care and self-management support do patients with type 2 diabetes want after their first acute coronary event? A qualitative study.2型糖尿病患者首次急性冠状动脉事件后希望得到哪些后续护理和自我管理支持?一项定性研究。
Prim Care Diabetes. 2014 Oct;8(3):195-206. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2013.12.001. Epub 2014 Jan 3.
7
Standards of medical care in diabetes--2014.2014年糖尿病医疗护理标准
Diabetes Care. 2014 Jan;37 Suppl 1:S14-80. doi: 10.2337/dc14-S014.
8
Adherence to therapies in patients with type 2 diabetes.2 型糖尿病患者的治疗依从性。
Diabetes Ther. 2013 Dec;4(2):175-94. doi: 10.1007/s13300-013-0034-y. Epub 2013 Aug 30.
9
Problem solving interventions for diabetes self-management and control: a systematic review of the literature.解决糖尿病自我管理和控制问题的干预措施:文献系统评价。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2013 May;100(2):145-61. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2012.12.016. Epub 2013 Jan 9.
10
Group based diabetes self-management education compared to routine treatment for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. A systematic review with meta-analysis.基于群组的糖尿病自我管理教育与常规治疗相比用于 2 型糖尿病患者。系统评价与荟萃分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Jul 23;12:213. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-213.