Chiou Chun-Chi, Tsai Tzu-Hsien, Lee Chien-Ho, Lin Cheng-Jei, Chung Wen-Jung, Hsuch Shu-Kai, Wu Po-Jui, Cheng Cheng-I
Department of Pharmacy.
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Acta Cardiol Sin. 2019 May;35(3):290-300. doi: 10.6515/ACS.201905_35(3).20181122B.
Controlling modifiable risk factors (MRFs) in patients with cardiovascular diseases has been shown to be effective in reducing re-hospitalization rates. The aim of this study was to investigate the rates of controlled MRFs and clinical outcomes after pharmacist interventions in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) after hospital discharge.
This prospective randomized clinical study was conducted at one medical center in Taiwan, and enrolled patients with MI from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2014. Patients received medication reconciliation and education from a pharmacist before hospital discharge. The intervention group (IG) received continuous consultations from the pharmacist after discharge, whereas the control group (CG) did not. Primary outcomes included achieving blood pressure < 140/70 mmHg, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) < 70 mg/dL, and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) < 7% targets. The secondary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), defined as re-hospitalization due to MI, unstable angina and stroke.
Two hundred and eight patients completed the study protocol (106 in the IG and 102 in the CG). The rate of achieving blood pressure goal was similar between the two groups. More patients in the IG achieved LDL-C and HbA1c goals than those in the CG at 1 year and 2 years post discharge. However, there was no significant difference in the cumulative incidence of MACEs between the two groups (5.7% vs. 9.8%) (p = 0.262). Diabetes was the only independent predictor of re-hospitalization due to a MACE.
Pharmacist interventions led to a higher rate of optimal controlled MRFs but did not significantly reduce the MACE rate in the patients with MI.
已证明控制心血管疾病患者的可改变风险因素(MRF)可有效降低再住院率。本研究的目的是调查药师干预对心肌梗死(MI)患者出院后MRF的控制率及临床结局。
本前瞻性随机临床研究在台湾的一家医疗中心进行,纳入了2012年1月1日至2014年12月31日期间的MI患者。患者在出院前接受了药师的用药核对与教育。干预组(IG)出院后接受药师的持续咨询,而对照组(CG)则未接受。主要结局包括血压<140/70 mmHg、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)<70 mg/dL和糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)<7%目标的达成情况。次要结局是主要不良心脏事件(MACE),定义为因MI、不稳定型心绞痛和中风再次住院。
208例患者完成了研究方案(IG组106例,CG组102例)。两组间血压目标达成率相似。出院后1年和2年时,IG组达到LDL-C和HbA1c目标的患者比CG组更多。然而,两组间MACE的累积发生率无显著差异(5.7%对9.8%)(p = 0.262)。糖尿病是因MACE再次住院的唯一独立预测因素。
药师干预使MI患者的MRF最佳控制率更高,但未显著降低MACE发生率。