• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

群组医疗诊所能否改善糖尿病患者的血脂管理?

Can group medical clinics improve lipid management in diabetes?

机构信息

Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC; Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, Duke University, Durham, NC.

Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC; Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

出版信息

Am J Med. 2014 Feb;127(2):145-51. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.09.027. Epub 2013 Oct 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.09.027
PMID:24462012
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Group medical clinics may improve diabetes and hypertension control, but data about dyslipidemia are limited. We examined the impact of group medical clinics on lipids among patients with uncontrolled diabetes and hypertension.

METHODS

Prespecified secondary analysis of 239 veterans randomized to group medical clinics or usual care. Lipids were assessed at study baseline, midpoint, and end. We used linear mixed models to compare lipid levels between arms and generalized estimating equation models to compare low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal attainment. An additional post hoc analysis examined intensification of cholesterol-lowering medications in both arms.

RESULTS

At baseline, mean total cholesterol was 169.7 mg/dL (SD 47.8), LDL-C 98.2 mg/dL (SD 41.7), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) 39.3 mg/dL (SD 13.0). Median baseline triglycerides were 131 mg/dL (interquartile range 122). By study end, mean total cholesterol and LDL-C in group medical clinics were 14.2 mg/dL (P = .01) and 9.2 mg/dL (P = .02) lower than usual care, respectively; 76% of group medical clinic patients met goals for LDL-C, versus 61% of usual care patients (P = .02). Triglycerides and HDL-C remained similar between study arms. Treatment intensification occurred in 52% of group medical clinic patients, versus 37% of usual care patients between study baseline and end (P = .04). The mean statin dose was higher in group medical clinic patients at study midpoint and end.

CONCLUSIONS

Group medical clinics appear to enhance lipid management among patients with diabetes and hypertension. This may be a result of greater intensification of cholesterol-lowering medications in group medical clinics relative to usual care.

摘要

背景

团体医疗诊所可能会改善糖尿病和高血压的控制情况,但有关血脂异常的数据有限。我们研究了团体医疗诊所对控制不佳的糖尿病和高血压患者血脂的影响。

方法

对 239 名随机分配到团体医疗诊所或常规护理的退伍军人进行了预设的二次分析。在研究的基线、中点和终点评估了血脂。我们使用线性混合模型比较了手臂之间的血脂水平,并使用广义估计方程模型比较了低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)目标的实现情况。另外,在后验分析中,我们还研究了两个手臂中降低胆固醇药物的强化情况。

结果

在基线时,平均总胆固醇为 169.7mg/dL(SD 47.8),LDL-C 为 98.2mg/dL(SD 41.7),高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)为 39.3mg/dL(SD 13.0)。中位数基线甘油三酯为 131mg/dL(四分位距 122)。在研究结束时,团体医疗诊所的平均总胆固醇和 LDL-C 分别比常规护理低 14.2mg/dL(P =.01)和 9.2mg/dL(P =.02);76%的团体医疗诊所患者达到了 LDL-C 的目标,而常规护理患者为 61%(P =.02)。研究组之间的甘油三酯和 HDL-C 仍相似。在研究基线到结束期间,团体医疗诊所患者中有 52%的患者进行了治疗强化,而常规护理患者中有 37%(P =.04)。在研究中点和结束时,团体医疗诊所患者的他汀类药物剂量均值较高。

结论

团体医疗诊所似乎可以改善糖尿病和高血压患者的血脂管理。这可能是由于团体医疗诊所相对于常规护理更加强化了降低胆固醇的药物治疗。

相似文献

1
Can group medical clinics improve lipid management in diabetes?群组医疗诊所能否改善糖尿病患者的血脂管理?
Am J Med. 2014 Feb;127(2):145-51. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.09.027. Epub 2013 Oct 15.
2
Clinical outcomes in managed-care patients with coronary heart disease treated aggressively in lipid-lowering disease management clinics: the alliance study.在降脂疾病管理诊所接受积极治疗的冠心病管理式医疗患者的临床结局:联盟研究
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Nov 2;44(9):1772-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.07.053.
3
Effectiveness of the addition of ezetimibe to ongoing statin therapy in modifying lipid profiles and attaining low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals in older and elderly patients: subanalyses of data from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.在老年患者中,依折麦布联合他汀类药物持续治疗对改善血脂谱及实现低密度脂蛋白胆固醇目标的有效性:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验数据的亚组分析
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2005 Dec;3(4):218-28.
4
Hypertriglyceridemia and residual dyslipidemia in statin-treated, patients with diabetes at the highest risk for cardiovascular disease and achieving very-low low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels.他汀类药物治疗的糖尿病患者存在严重的高三酰甘油血症和残余血脂异常,这些患者心血管疾病风险最高,且达到非常低的 LDL-C 水平。
J Clin Lipidol. 2012 Sep-Oct;6(5):434-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2012.04.002. Epub 2012 Apr 12.
5
Understanding disparities in lipid management among patients with type 2 diabetes: gender differences in medication nonadherence after treatment intensification.了解2型糖尿病患者血脂管理的差异:强化治疗后药物治疗不依从性的性别差异。
Womens Health Issues. 2015 Jan-Feb;25(1):6-12. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.09.004. Epub 2014 Nov 22.
6
[Screening for hyperlipidemia in cardiovascular high-risk patients in austrian diabetes ambulances].[奥地利糖尿病门诊心血管高危患者的高脂血症筛查]
MMW Fortschr Med. 2012 Jun 28;154 Suppl 2:41-7.
7
Age, abdominal obesity, and baseline high-sensitivity C-reactive protein are associated with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B responses to ezetimibe/simvastatin and atorvastatin in patients with metabolic syndrome.年龄、腹型肥胖和基线高敏 C 反应蛋白与代谢综合征患者接受依折麦布/辛伐他汀和阿托伐他汀治疗后低密度脂蛋白胆固醇、非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇和载脂蛋白 B 的反应相关。
J Clin Lipidol. 2013 Jul-Aug;7(4):292-303. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2013.03.007. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
8
Reduction in estimated risk for coronary artery disease after use of ezetimibe with a statin.使用依折麦布与他汀类药物联合治疗后,冠状动脉疾病估计风险降低。
Ann Pharmacother. 2007 Sep;41(9):1345-51. doi: 10.1345/aph.1K140. Epub 2007 Jul 31.
9
Achieving optimal lipid goals in patients with coronary artery disease.实现冠心病患者的最佳血脂目标。
Am J Cardiol. 2011 Mar 15;107(6):886-90. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.11.006. Epub 2011 Jan 19.
10
Attainment of normal lipid levels among patients on lipid-modifying therapy in Hong Kong.香港调脂治疗患者的血脂达标情况。
Adv Ther. 2012 May;29(5):427-41. doi: 10.1007/s12325-012-0017-9. Epub 2012 May 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of shared medical appointments delivered in primary care for improving health outcomes in patients with long-term conditions: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.在初级保健中实施的共同医疗预约对改善长期疾病患者健康结果的有效性:随机对照试验的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 7;14(3):e067252. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067252.
2
Intensifying approaches to address clinical inertia among cardiovascular disease risk factors: A narrative review.强化针对心血管疾病风险因素的临床惯性的方法:叙事性综述。
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Dec;105(12):3381-3388. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.08.005. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
3
Group Medical Care: A Systematic Review of Health Service Performance.
团体医疗保健:对卫生服务绩效的系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 2;18(23):12726. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312726.
4
Impact of a Multidisciplinary, Endocrinologist-Led Shared Medical Appointment Model on Diabetes-Related Outcomes in an Underserved Population.多学科、由内分泌科医生主导的共享医疗预约模式对服务不足人群糖尿病相关结局的影响。
Diabetes Spectr. 2020 Feb;33(1):74-81. doi: 10.2337/ds19-0026.
5
Impact of Pharmacist Interventions on the Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Myocardial Infarction.药师干预对心肌梗死患者长期临床结局的影响
Acta Cardiol Sin. 2019 May;35(3):290-300. doi: 10.6515/ACS.201905_35(3).20181122B.
6
To condition or not condition? Analysing 'change' in longitudinal randomised controlled trials.是否进行条件设定?分析纵向随机对照试验中的“变化”
BMJ Open. 2016 Dec 30;6(12):e013096. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013096.
7
Using Group Medical Visits With Those Who Have Diabetes: Examining the Evidence.针对糖尿病患者开展小组医疗问诊:审视相关证据。
Curr Diab Rep. 2016 Dec;16(12):134. doi: 10.1007/s11892-016-0817-4.