• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜治疗腹前壁和切口疝指南更新(国际腹内疝学会(IEHS))-A 部分。

Update of Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society (IEHS))-Part A.

机构信息

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), Trubetskaya str., 8, b. 2, 119992, Moscow, Russia.

Emeritus Director Marienhospital Stuttgart, Supperstr. 19, 70565, Stuttgart, Germany.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2019 Oct;33(10):3069-3139. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06907-7. Epub 2019 Jun 27.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-019-06907-7
PMID:31250243
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6722153/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

In 2014, the International Endohernia Society (IEHS) published the first international "Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias." Guidelines reflect the currently best available evidence in diagnostics and therapy and give recommendations to help surgeons to standardize their techniques and to improve their results. However, science is a dynamic field which is continuously developing. Therefore, guidelines require regular updates to keep pace with the evolving literature.

METHODS

For the development of the original guidelines, all relevant literature published up to year 2012 was analyzed using the ranking of the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. For the present update, all of the previous authors were asked to evaluate the literature published during the recent years from 2012 to 2017 and revise their statements and recommendations given in the initial guidelines accordingly. In two Consensus Conferences (October 2017 Beijing, March 2018 Cologne), the updates were presented, discussed, and confirmed. To avoid redundancy, only new statements or recommendations are included in this paper. Therefore, for full understanding both of the guidelines, the original and the current, must be read. In addition, the new developments in repair of abdominal wall hernias like surgical techniques within the abdominal wall, release operations (transversus muscle release, component separation), Botox application, and robot-assisted repair methods were included.

RESULTS

Due to an increase of the number of patients and further development of surgical techniques, repair of primary and secondary abdominal wall hernias attracts increasing interests of many surgeons. Whereas up to three decades ago hernia-related publications did not exceed 20 per year, currently this number is about 10-fold higher. Recent years are characterized by the advent of new techniques-minimal invasive techniques using robotics and laparoscopy, totally extraperitoneal repairs, novel myofascial release techniques for optimal closure of large defects, and Botox for relaxing the abdominal wall. Furthermore, a concomitant rectus diastasis was recognized as a significant risk factor for recurrence. Despite insufficient evidence with respect to these new techniques, it seemed to us necessary to include them in the update to stimulate surgeons to do research in these fields.

CONCLUSION

Guidelines are recommendations based on best available evidence intended to help the surgeon to improve the quality of his daily work. However, science is a continuously evolving process, and as such guidelines should be updated about every 3 years. For a comprehensive reference, however, it is suggested to read both the initial guidelines published in 2014 together with the update. Moreover, the presented update includes also techniques which were not known 3 years before.

摘要

目的

国际疝学会(IEHS)于 2014 年发布了首份腹腔镜治疗腹壁前侧和切口疝的国际“指南”。指南反映了目前在诊断和治疗方面最佳的现有证据,并提供了有助于外科医生规范技术和提高治疗效果的建议。然而,科学是一个不断发展的领域。因此,指南需要定期更新,以跟上不断发展的文献。

方法

为制定原始指南,使用牛津循证医学中心的分级方法对截至 2012 年发表的所有相关文献进行了分析。为本次更新,要求所有原作者评估 2012 年至 2017 年期间发表的文献,并相应地修改他们在初始指南中的陈述和建议。在两次共识会议(2017 年 10 月北京,2018 年 3 月科隆)上,对更新内容进行了陈述、讨论和确认。为避免重复,本文仅包括新的陈述或建议。因此,为了全面理解指南,必须同时阅读原始指南和现行指南。此外,还包括腹壁疝修复方面的新进展,如腹壁内的手术技术、松解手术(腹直肌松解、腹直肌前鞘分离)、肉毒杆菌毒素的应用以及机器人辅助修复方法。

结果

由于患者数量的增加和手术技术的进一步发展,原发性和继发性腹壁疝的修复引起了越来越多外科医生的兴趣。而在 30 年前,疝相关出版物每年不超过 20 篇,而现在则增加了近 10 倍。近年来的特点是新技术的出现,如机器人辅助腹腔镜微创手术、完全腹膜外修补术、新型肌筋膜松解技术以优化大缺损的闭合以及用于放松腹壁的肉毒杆菌毒素。此外,还认识到同时存在腹直肌分离是复发的重要危险因素。尽管这些新技术的证据不足,但我们认为有必要在更新中纳入这些技术,以鼓励外科医生在这些领域开展研究。

结论

指南是基于最佳现有证据的建议,旨在帮助外科医生提高日常工作质量。然而,科学是一个不断发展的过程,因此指南应每 3 年更新一次。然而,为了全面参考,建议同时阅读 2014 年发布的原始指南和更新内容。此外,本次更新还包括了 3 年前未知的技术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92d3/6722153/6cced6c8ccf6/464_2019_6907_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92d3/6722153/8f7f450b7987/464_2019_6907_Figa_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92d3/6722153/2cdc63f71079/464_2019_6907_Figb_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92d3/6722153/0d0998393e9c/464_2019_6907_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92d3/6722153/9366bb8c7109/464_2019_6907_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92d3/6722153/4784bcd76948/464_2019_6907_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92d3/6722153/6cced6c8ccf6/464_2019_6907_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92d3/6722153/8f7f450b7987/464_2019_6907_Figa_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92d3/6722153/2cdc63f71079/464_2019_6907_Figb_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92d3/6722153/0d0998393e9c/464_2019_6907_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92d3/6722153/9366bb8c7109/464_2019_6907_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92d3/6722153/4784bcd76948/464_2019_6907_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92d3/6722153/6cced6c8ccf6/464_2019_6907_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Update of Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society (IEHS))-Part A.腹腔镜治疗腹前壁和切口疝指南更新(国际腹内疝学会(IEHS))-A 部分。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Oct;33(10):3069-3139. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06907-7. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
2
Update of Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society (IEHS)): Part B.腹腔镜治疗腹侧和切口腹壁疝指南更新(国际腹内疝学会 (IEHS)):B 部分。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Nov;33(11):3511-3549. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06908-6. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
3
[Abdominal wall hernias part 2 : Operative treatment techniques].[腹壁疝 第2部分:手术治疗技术]
Chirurg. 2021 Aug;92(8):755-768. doi: 10.1007/s00104-021-01383-z. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
4
Mini- or less-open sublay (E/MILOS) operation vs open sublay and laparoscopic IPOM repair for the treatment of incisional hernias: a registry-based propensity score matched analysis of the 5-year results.微型或小切口下(sublay)修补术(E/MILOS)与开放式下(sublay)修补术和腹腔镜 IPOM 修复术治疗切口疝的 5 年疗效比较:基于注册的倾向评分匹配分析。
Hernia. 2024 Feb;28(1):179-190. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02847-3. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
5
Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society (IEHS)-part 1.腹腔镜治疗腹壁下和切口疝的指南(国际腹内疝学会 (IEHS)-第 1 部分。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Jan;28(1):2-29. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3170-6. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
6
Robotic-assisted repair of incisional hernia-early experiences of a university robotic hernia program and comparison with open and minimally invasive sublay technique (eMILOS).机器人辅助切口疝修补术-大学机器人疝项目的早期经验及与开放和微创经腹腔入路腹膜前修补术(eMILOS)的比较。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Oct 12;408(1):396. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-03129-3.
7
Laparoscopic Stapled Sublay Repair With Self-Gripping Mesh: A Simplified Technique for Minimally Invasive Extraperitoneal Ventral Hernia Repair.使用自固定补片的腹腔镜钉合肌后间隙修补术:一种用于微创腹膜外腹疝修补的简化技术
Surg Technol Int. 2016 Oct 26;29:131-139.
8
Early operative outcomes of endoscopic (eTEP access) robotic-assisted retromuscular abdominal wall hernia repair.内镜(经脐单孔腹腔镜入路)机器人辅助肌后腹壁疝修补术的早期手术结果
Hernia. 2018 Oct;22(5):837-847. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1795-z. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
9
Interposition of the omentum and/or the peritoneum in the emergency repair of large ventral hernias with polypropylene mesh.网膜和/或腹膜在聚丙烯网片急诊修补大型腹壁疝中的应用。
Int J Surg. 2014;12(6):578-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.04.009. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
10
New techniques in ventral hernia surgery - an evolution of minimally-invasivehernia repairs.腹外疝手术新技术——微创疝修补术的发展。
Pol Przegl Chir. 2020 Jan 30;92(3):48-56. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0013.7857.

引用本文的文献

1
What is the preferred mesh placement in primary ventral hernia repair? An international survey of 442 surgeons.在原发性腹疝修补术中,哪种补片放置方式更可取?一项针对442名外科医生的国际调查。
Hernia. 2025 Sep 9;29(1):273. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03429-1.
2
Laparoscopic Extraperitoneal Repair with Upfront Coring out of Hernia Defect for Ventral Hernia.腹腔镜腹膜外修补术联合疝缺损先行环切术治疗腹疝
JSLS. 2025 Jul-Sep;29(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2025.00037. Epub 2025 Sep 3.
3
Recurrence rate and mesh bulging are reduced with primary fascial closure in ventral hernia repair: the PROSECO randomized clinical trial.
在腹疝修补术中,采用一期筋膜缝合可降低复发率和补片膨出:PROSECO随机临床试验
Br J Surg. 2025 Sep 2;112(9). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znaf169.
4
Short-term outcomes after robot-assisted retromuscular versus laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair of small-to-medium ventral hernias: a prospective, multicenter, propensity score-matched analysis.机器人辅助肌后修补与腹腔镜腹膜内补片修补中、小型腹疝的短期疗效:一项前瞻性、多中心、倾向评分匹配分析
Hernia. 2025 Aug 23;29(1):257. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03431-7.
5
Evaluating the impact of diastasis recti on ipom plus ventral hernia repair.评估腹直肌分离对IPOM加腹疝修补术的影响。
Hernia. 2025 Aug 14;29(1):253. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03451-3.
6
Why should there be an update of the guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias by the International Endohernia Society?为什么国际内镜疝学会要更新腹腔镜治疗腹前壁和切口疝的指南?
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025 Jul 16;87(8):5333-5334. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000003132. eCollection 2025 Aug.
7
Abandoning mesh "overlap" in favor of "width" and its importance in open retromuscular midline incisional hernia repair: a nationwide database study.放弃网片“重叠”而采用“宽度”及其在开放的肌后中线切口疝修补术中的重要性:一项全国性数据库研究
Hernia. 2025 Jul 29;29(1):237. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03423-7.
8
Diastasis plication during robotic transabdominal preperitoneal repair (rTAPP): a case series of outcomes at a tertiary care center.机器人经腹腹膜前修补术(rTAPP)中的腹直肌分离折叠术:三级医疗中心的一系列病例结果
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jul 18. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11989-7.
9
Rectus diastasis is a risk factor for incisional hernia after robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.腹直肌分离是机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术后切口疝的一个危险因素。
Hernia. 2025 Jul 16;29(1):233. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03419-3.
10
Transabdominal pre-peritoneal hernia repair: risk of operation for recurrence depends on choice of both mesh and fixation device. A study from the Danish Hernia Database.经腹腹膜前疝修补术:复发的手术风险取决于补片和固定装置的选择。来自丹麦疝数据库的一项研究。
Hernia. 2025 Jul 11;29(1):229. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03344-5.