Department of Anthropology, Northwestern University, 1810 Hinman Ave., Evanston, IL, 60208, USA.
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Rd., Evanston, IL, 60208, USA.
J Environ Manage. 2019 Sep 15;246:868-880. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.028. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
The increase in frequency and intensity of urban flooding is a global challenge. Flooding directly impacts residents of industrialized cities with aging combined sewer systems, as well as cities with less centralized infrastructure to manage stormwater, fecal sludge, and wastewater. Green infrastructure is growing in popularity as a sustainable strategy to mimic nature-based flood management. Although its technical performance has been extensively studied, little is known about the effects of green stormwater infrastructure on human health and social well-being.
We conducted a multidisciplinary systematic review of peer-reviewed and gray literature on the effects of green infrastructure for stormwater and flood management on individuals', households', and communities' a) physical health; b) mental health; c) economic well-being; and d) flood resilience and social acceptance of green infrastructure. We systematically searched databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus; the first 300 results in Google Scholar; and websites of key organizations including the United States Environmental Protection Agency. Study quality and strength of evidence was assessed for included studies, and descriptive data were extracted for a narrative summary.
Out of 21,213 initial results, only 18 studies reported health or social well-being outcomes. Seven of these studies used primary data, and none allowed for causal inference. No studies connected green infrastructure for stormwater and flood management to mental or physical health outcomes. Thirteen studies were identified on economic outcomes, largely reporting a positive association between green infrastructure and property values. Five studies assessed changes in perceptions about green infrastructure, but with mixed results. Nearly half of all included studies were from Portland, Oregon.
This global systematic review highlights the minimal evidence on human health and social well-being relating to green infrastructure for stormwater and flood management. To enable scale-up of this type of infrastructure to reduce flooding and improve ecological and human well-being, widespread acceptance of green infrastructure will be essential. Policymakers and planners need evidence on the full range of benefits from different contexts to enable financing and implementation of instfrastructure options, especially in highly urbanized, flood-prone settings around the world. Therefore, experts in social science, public health, and program evaluation must be integrated into interdisciplinary green infrastructure research to better relate infrastructure design to tangible human outcomes.
城市洪灾的频率和强度不断增加,这是一个全球性的挑战。洪灾直接影响到那些拥有老化合流制下水道系统的工业化城市的居民,以及那些基础设施较不集中、难以管理雨水、粪便污泥和废水的城市。绿色基础设施作为一种模仿基于自然的洪水管理的可持续策略,越来越受到欢迎。尽管其技术性能已经得到了广泛的研究,但对于绿色雨水基础设施对人类健康和社会福祉的影响却知之甚少。
我们对有关绿色基础设施在雨水和洪水管理方面对个人、家庭和社区的影响进行了多学科系统的综述,这些影响包括:a)身体健康;b)心理健康;c)经济福祉;以及 d)洪水韧性和对绿色基础设施的社会接受度。我们系统地搜索了 PubMed、Web of Science 和 Scopus 等数据库;Google Scholar 前 300 个结果;以及包括美国环境保护署在内的关键组织的网站。我们对纳入研究的质量和证据强度进行了评估,并对叙述性摘要进行了描述性数据提取。
在 21213 项初始结果中,只有 18 项研究报告了健康或社会福利方面的结果。其中 7 项研究使用了原始数据,但没有一项允许进行因果推断。没有研究将雨水和洪水管理的绿色基础设施与心理健康或身体健康结果联系起来。有 13 项研究涉及经济成果,这些研究大多报告了绿色基础设施与房地产价值之间的正相关关系。有 5 项研究评估了对绿色基础设施的看法变化,但结果不一。几乎一半的纳入研究来自俄勒冈州波特兰市。
这项全球性的系统综述强调了与雨水和洪水管理的绿色基础设施有关的人类健康和社会福利方面的证据有限。为了能够扩大这种类型的基础设施的规模,以减少洪水并改善生态和人类福祉,广泛接受绿色基础设施将是至关重要的。政策制定者和规划者需要从不同背景下获得全方位的利益证据,以能够为基础设施选项提供资金并付诸实施,特别是在世界范围内那些高度城市化、易受洪水影响的地区。因此,社会科学、公共卫生和项目评估方面的专家必须融入跨学科的绿色基础设施研究,以便更好地将基础设施设计与有形的人类成果联系起来。