VA HSR&D Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota; Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Department of Medicine, VA New York Harbor Healthcare System, New York, New York; Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York.
Womens Health Issues. 2019 Jun 25;29 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S15-S23. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2019.04.001.
Female veterans smoke cigarettes at high rates compared with both male veterans and nonveteran women. Proactive outreach to smokers may reduce gender disparities in cessation care. The objectives of this study were to compare baseline experiences with VA smoking cessation care for men and women and to assess for gender differences in response to a proactive outreach intervention.
We conducted a post hoc subgroup analysis of a pragmatic, multisite randomized, controlled trial comparing proactive outreach with usual care (UC). Baseline experiences included physician advice to quit, satisfaction with care, and past-year treatment use. At the 1-year follow-up, treatment use, quit attempts, and 6-month prolonged abstinence for women and men randomized to proactive outreach versus UC were compared using logistic regression.
Baseline and follow-up surveys were returned by 138 women and 2,516 men. At baseline, women were less likely than men to report being very or somewhat satisfied with the process of obtaining smoking cessation medications in the VA (47% of women vs. 62% of men), but no less likely to report having used cessation medications from the VA in the past year (39% of women vs. 34% of men). After the intervention, phone counseling and combined therapy increased among both women and men in proactive outreach as compared with UC. At the 1-year follow-up, men in proactive outreach were significantly more likely to report prolonged abstinence than those in UC (odds ratio, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.28-2.14); results for women were in the same direction but not statistically significant (odds ratio, 1.39; 95% CI, 0.48-3.99).
Satisfaction with cessation care in VA remains low. Proactive outreach to smokers was associated with an increased use of cessation therapies, and increased odds of achieving prolonged abstinence. A subgroup analysis by gender did not reveal significant differences in the treatment effect.
与男性退伍军人和非退伍军人女性相比,女性退伍军人吸烟率较高。积极主动地与吸烟者接触可能会减少戒烟护理方面的性别差距。本研究的目的是比较男性和女性退伍军人在 VA 戒烟护理方面的基线经验,并评估积极主动的外展干预对退伍军人的反应是否存在性别差异。
我们对一项实用、多地点随机、对照试验进行了事后亚组分析,该试验比较了积极主动的外展与常规护理 (UC)。基线经验包括医生戒烟建议、对护理的满意度和过去一年的治疗使用情况。在 1 年随访时,使用逻辑回归比较了随机分配到积极外展组和 UC 组的女性和男性的治疗使用、戒烟尝试和 6 个月的长期戒烟率。
基线和随访调查分别由 138 名女性和 2516 名男性回复。在基线时,与男性相比,女性更不可能报告在 VA 获得戒烟药物的过程中非常或有些满意(47%的女性对 62%的男性),但过去一年在 VA 使用戒烟药物的可能性并不低(39%的女性对 34%的男性)。干预后,与 UC 相比,积极外展组的女性和男性都增加了电话咨询和联合治疗。在 1 年随访时,与 UC 相比,积极外展组的男性报告长期戒烟的可能性显著更高(比值比,1.65;95%置信区间,1.28-2.14);女性的结果方向相同,但无统计学意义(比值比,1.39;95%置信区间,0.48-3.99)。
退伍军人事务部戒烟护理的满意度仍然较低。积极主动地接触吸烟者与增加使用戒烟疗法和增加长期戒烟的几率有关。按性别进行的亚组分析并未显示治疗效果存在显著差异。