A volume-pressure tail cuff method for hemodynamic parameters: Comparison of restraint and light isoflurane anesthesia in normotensive male Lewis rats.

INTRODUCTION

A volume-pressure sensor and tail-cuff method for monitoring blood pressure is non-invasive and inexpensive. This method requires animals to be restrained or subjected to anesthesia, but comparative effects of these manipulations on hemodynamic parameters have not been documented.

METHODS

Using a volume-pressure sensor and tail-cuff, we serially measured blood pressure and heart rate in normotensive adult male Lewis rats after light isoflurane-induced anesthesia (5% induction, 1% maintenance) and, following untrained restraint. Blood pressure was recorded until the acquisition of three complete measurements without the range of replicate mean arterial pressures exceeding 15 mmHg (steady-state).

RESULTS

Averages for the entire series of consecutive measurements indicated that restraint yielded significantly higher systolic and diastolic blood pressure than anesthesia (P < .05), but heart rate was not affected. Following stabilization at steady-state, there were no significant differences in intra- or inter-day hemodynamic values between the restraint and isoflurane groups. The inter-day coefficient of variation for systolic pressure was 13-23% for isoflurane and 9-14% for restraint. Bland-Altman analysis showed wide limits of agreement (±59 mmHg systolic; ±49 mmHg diastolic pressure) between restraint and isoflurane measurements.

DISCUSSION

Isoflurane caused more variability but there was agreement in BP evaluation by the isoflurane and restraint methods. Using the VPR system, light isoflurane-induced anesthesia and restraint could effectively be used to screen and quantify overt changes in hemodynamic parameters for cardiovascular research utilizing laboratory rodents.