Suppr超能文献

工具和物体可供性:一项生态眼动追踪研究。

Tool and object affordances: An ecological eye-tracking study.

机构信息

Laboratory of Experimental Psychology, Suor Orsola Benincasa University, Naples, Italy.

Laboratory of Experimental Psychology, Suor Orsola Benincasa University, Naples, Italy.

出版信息

Brain Cogn. 2019 Oct;135:103582. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2019.103582. Epub 2019 Jun 27.

Abstract

In the present eye-tracking study, we analysed the visuo-spatial attentional patterns of participants looking at 3D images depicting single tools and object-tool pairs. The object-tool pairs could be thematically consistent, thematically inconsistent or spatially inconsistent. During the first 500 ms of visual exploration, tools were fixated longer on their functional area in all experimental conditions. However, extending the time-window of analysis to 1750 ms, the visual scene was encoded in a faster and more suited-for-action way in the thematically consistent condition (e.g., hammer-nail). Most important, the visual exploration of the thematically consistent pairs focused on the manipulation area of the tool (e.g., the handle of the hammer) more than on its functional area (e.g., the head of the hammer). Finally, when single tools were shown and the entire time-window of analysis was considered (1750 ms), fixation focused on the tool's manipulation area. These results are discussed within the reasoning-based framework of tool use. They highlight the relative role of the visuo-perceptual context in affordance perception and suggest a novel interpretation of the cognitive mechanisms underlying the processing of tools and object-tool pairs in terms of action reappraisal (i.e., a re-functionalization process when the action possibility is mined by the visuo-perceptual context).

摘要

在本项眼动研究中,我们分析了参与者观看三维图像时的视空间注意模式,这些图像描绘了单一工具和工具-物体对。这些工具-物体对可以在主题上一致、不一致或空间上不一致。在视觉探索的前 500 毫秒内,所有实验条件下,工具在其功能区域的注视时间都更长。然而,将分析时间窗口扩展到 1750 毫秒时,在主题一致的条件下(例如,锤子-钉子),视觉场景以更快且更适合行动的方式被编码。最重要的是,主题一致的工具对的视觉探索更关注工具的操作区域(例如,锤子的把手),而不是其功能区域(例如,锤子的头部)。最后,当只展示单一工具且考虑整个分析时间窗口(1750 毫秒)时,注视点集中在工具的操作区域。这些结果在基于推理的工具使用框架内进行了讨论。它们突出了视知觉上下文在感知功能方面的相对作用,并根据动作再评价(即,当动作可能性被视知觉上下文挖掘时的重新功能化过程)提出了一种新的解释,用于解释工具和工具-物体对处理背后的认知机制。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验